Incidence of the diagnosis of factitious disorders - Nationwide comparison study between Germany and Norway.
Epidemiology
Factitious disorders
Illness deception
Incidence
Munchausen syndrome
Journal
Forensic science, medicine, and pathology
ISSN: 1556-2891
Titre abrégé: Forensic Sci Med Pathol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101236111
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
accepted:
26
05
2020
pubmed:
12
6
2020
medline:
7
4
2021
entrez:
12
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Factitious disorders (FD) like Munchausen syndrome are well known to most physicians, yet the corresponding ICD-10 diagnosis F68.1 remains severely under-assigned and often misdiagnosed. To approach this problem, we conducted a nationwide inquiry for Germany and Norway as well as a comparison between these two countries regarding the incidence of diagnosis of FD. The assignment rates of F68.1 in somatic hospitals from 2008 to 2016 were analyzed based on the Diagnosis Related Groups statistic from the German Federal Statistical Office and the data provided from the Norwegian Patient Registry. The Norwegian data also included information on individual patients whereas the German data only contained the total number of F68.1 assignment due to strict medical confidentiality laws. The incidence of the diagnosis of FD in Germany and Norway showed similar assignment rates with 3.71 and 3.18 per 100,000, respectively. The mean age was 39.4 years for German patients and 35.6 years for Norwegian patients. The gender distribution was almost equal for the individual patients' rate (49% female and 51% male). Furthermore, our results indicate that female patients with FD tend to demand healthcare services more frequently than male patients. Smaller studies focusing on the diagnosis of FD have significantly higher assignment rates compared to nationwide inquiries. Our results illustrate substantial differences between estimations of the incidence of FD and the need for further studies. Besides the many obstacles associated with diagnosis of FD, strict medical confidentiality laws prevent reliable and scientific investigations of this matter.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32524413
doi: 10.1007/s12024-020-00272-x
pii: 10.1007/s12024-020-00272-x
pmc: PMC7449943
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
450-456Références
Psychosomatics. 2010 Jan-Feb;51(1):47-54
pubmed: 20118440
Ann Clin Biochem. 2013 May;50(Pt 3):194-203
pubmed: 23592802
Lancet. 1951 Feb 10;1(6650):339-41
pubmed: 14805062
Psychosomatics. 1990 Fall;31(4):392-9
pubmed: 2247566
Int J Psychiatry Med. 1993;23(1):81-94
pubmed: 8514467
Psychosomatics. 2004 Jul-Aug;45(4):350-3
pubmed: 15232050
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1996 May;184(5):281-8
pubmed: 8627273
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2017 May 23;137(10):696-697
pubmed: 28551963
Am J Med. 1978 Nov;65(5):745-55
pubmed: 707533
J Child Health Care. 2013 Dec;17(4):366-74
pubmed: 23411659
Behav Neurol. 2019 Mar 3;2019:3891809
pubmed: 30944662
Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2006 Mar;3(3):46-55
pubmed: 21103164
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2017 Dec 11;10:387-394
pubmed: 29270035
Nervenarzt. 1998 May;69(5):401-9
pubmed: 9629556
Lancet. 2014 Apr 19;383(9926):1422-32
pubmed: 24612861
N Z Med J. 2011 Sep 09;124(1342):66-81
pubmed: 21963927
South Med J. 2000 Jul;93(7):669-72
pubmed: 10923952
Indian J Psychol Med. 2014 Jan;36(1):62-5
pubmed: 24701013
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016 Jul-Aug;41:20-8
pubmed: 27302720
Klin Wochenschr. 1986 Feb 17;64(4):149-64
pubmed: 3959494
Psychosomatics. 2013 Mar-Apr;54(2):142-8
pubmed: 23274011