Is higher psychotropic medication burden associated with involuntary treatment under the Mental Health Act? A four-year Australian cohort study.
Adult
Antipsychotic Agents
/ adverse effects
Australia
Drug Therapy, Combination
Drug Utilization
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Involuntary Treatment
/ methods
Male
Mental Disorders
/ drug therapy
Mental Health
Polypharmacy
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
Prescription Drugs
/ therapeutic use
Psychotropic Drugs
/ adverse effects
Quality of Life
Queensland
Retrospective Studies
Antipsychotic
Involuntary treatment
Medication
Polypharmacy
Psychotropics
Journal
BMC psychiatry
ISSN: 1471-244X
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968559
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 06 2020
11 06 2020
Historique:
received:
21
11
2019
accepted:
11
05
2020
entrez:
13
6
2020
pubmed:
13
6
2020
medline:
27
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Involuntary treatment for individuals who lack sufficient capacity to make informed decisions regarding treatment has been associated with increased rates of injectable antipsychotics, antipsychotic polytherapy, and/or high doses. However, little is known about non-antipsychotic psychotropic prescription, or psychotropic medication burden as a more encompassing approach for people treated involuntarily. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between Mental Health Act (MHA) status and psychotropic polypharmacy and/or high-dose medication prescribing practices in an Australian inpatient mental health unit. A retrospective cohort study of 800 adults discharged from a large metropolitan Queensland mental health unit was undertaken. Data was collected for 200 individuals, discharged on at least one psychotropic medicine, at four time periods; Cohort 1 (on or before 31st January 2014), Cohort 2 (2015), Cohort 3 (2016) and Cohort 4 (2017). The number of prescribed medicines and total daily doses were recorded and reviewed for alignment with current clinical guidelines. Participant demographics and clinical characteristics were compared by individual MHA status using chi-square test for categorical variables and analysis of variance for continuous variables. Associations between MHA status and prescribing practices (psychotropic polypharmacy and/or high-dose prescribing) were assessed using bivariate and multivariate binomial logistic regression models. Age, gender, birth country, year of admission, admissions in previous 12 months, primary diagnosis, ECT/clozapine treatment, and other psychotropic medications were adjusted as covariates. Regression analysis found that compared to their voluntary counterparts, individuals treated involuntarily were 2.7 times more likely to be prescribed an antipsychotic at discharge, 8.8 times more likely to be prescribed more than one antipsychotic at discharge and 1.65 times more likely to be prescribed high-dose antipsychotic treatment at discharge. The adjusted model also found that they were half as likely to be prescribed an antidepressant at discharge. Implicit review of justifications for increased psychotropic medication burden (antipsychotic polypharmacy and high-doses) in those treated involuntarily is required to ensure clinical outcomes and overall quality of life are improved in this vulnerable group. Clearly documented medication histories, reconciliation at discharge and directions for medication management after discharge are necessary to ensure quality use of medicines.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Involuntary treatment for individuals who lack sufficient capacity to make informed decisions regarding treatment has been associated with increased rates of injectable antipsychotics, antipsychotic polytherapy, and/or high doses. However, little is known about non-antipsychotic psychotropic prescription, or psychotropic medication burden as a more encompassing approach for people treated involuntarily. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between Mental Health Act (MHA) status and psychotropic polypharmacy and/or high-dose medication prescribing practices in an Australian inpatient mental health unit.
METHODS
A retrospective cohort study of 800 adults discharged from a large metropolitan Queensland mental health unit was undertaken. Data was collected for 200 individuals, discharged on at least one psychotropic medicine, at four time periods; Cohort 1 (on or before 31st January 2014), Cohort 2 (2015), Cohort 3 (2016) and Cohort 4 (2017). The number of prescribed medicines and total daily doses were recorded and reviewed for alignment with current clinical guidelines. Participant demographics and clinical characteristics were compared by individual MHA status using chi-square test for categorical variables and analysis of variance for continuous variables. Associations between MHA status and prescribing practices (psychotropic polypharmacy and/or high-dose prescribing) were assessed using bivariate and multivariate binomial logistic regression models. Age, gender, birth country, year of admission, admissions in previous 12 months, primary diagnosis, ECT/clozapine treatment, and other psychotropic medications were adjusted as covariates.
RESULTS
Regression analysis found that compared to their voluntary counterparts, individuals treated involuntarily were 2.7 times more likely to be prescribed an antipsychotic at discharge, 8.8 times more likely to be prescribed more than one antipsychotic at discharge and 1.65 times more likely to be prescribed high-dose antipsychotic treatment at discharge. The adjusted model also found that they were half as likely to be prescribed an antidepressant at discharge.
CONCLUSION
Implicit review of justifications for increased psychotropic medication burden (antipsychotic polypharmacy and high-doses) in those treated involuntarily is required to ensure clinical outcomes and overall quality of life are improved in this vulnerable group. Clearly documented medication histories, reconciliation at discharge and directions for medication management after discharge are necessary to ensure quality use of medicines.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32527250
doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02661-6
pii: 10.1186/s12888-020-02661-6
pmc: PMC7291489
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antipsychotic Agents
0
Prescription Drugs
0
Psychotropic Drugs
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
294Références
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;64(10):1123-31
pubmed: 17909124
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2016 May;50(5):410-72
pubmed: 27106681
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2007 Nov;34(6):540-7
pubmed: 17957463
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2002 Oct;36(5):649-56
pubmed: 12225449
Australas Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;24(4):360-4
pubmed: 26819405
Schizophr Res. 2012 Jun;138(1):18-28
pubmed: 22534420
Australas Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;25(4):426
pubmed: 28747119
Int J Clin Pract. 2014 Feb;68(2):236-44
pubmed: 24372715
Schizophr Bull. 1998;24(1):11-20; discussion 20-32
pubmed: 9502543
J Psychopharmacol. 2011 May;25(5):567-620
pubmed: 21292923
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2014 Aug;28(4):272-6
pubmed: 25017561
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Aug;57(8):1094-101
pubmed: 16870959
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Sep;267:541-550
pubmed: 29980135
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2012 Feb;2(1):5-11
pubmed: 23983950
Med J Aust. 2015 Dec 14;203(11):432-4
pubmed: 26654607
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008 Jun;258(4):195-209
pubmed: 18080170
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2012 May;125(5):372-81
pubmed: 22321029
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011 Sep;45(9):705-8
pubmed: 21827343
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016 Jul-Aug;47:53-9
pubmed: 27033975
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2009 Nov;52:S57-62
pubmed: 19880919
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Apr;161(4):700-6
pubmed: 15056517
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Dec 30;246:142-148
pubmed: 27693867
Malays J Med Sci. 2018 Jul;25(4):122-130
pubmed: 30914854
Asian J Psychiatr. 2018 Jun;35:141-145
pubmed: 28259634
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Oct 21;11(10):10967-90
pubmed: 25337943
Lancet. 2017 Jan 28;389(10067):363
pubmed: 28137687
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 13;17(1):139
pubmed: 28407747
Australas Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;22(6):546-50
pubmed: 25147317