Preventing ceramic liner fracture after Delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty.
Ceramic fracture
Delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty
Noise
Taper angle
Zimmer biomet
Journal
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
ISSN: 1434-3916
Titre abrégé: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9011043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
29
01
2020
pubmed:
13
6
2020
medline:
10
7
2021
entrez:
13
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with use of Delta ceramic articulation were successful at medium term follow-up. The use of this newest ceramic has markedly reduced the incidence of ceramic head fractures, but not the incidence of ceramic liner fractures. We tested a hypothesis that the ceramic fractures are prevented by use of a metal shell with 18° inner taper angle and a stem design with a reduced neck geometry. We conducted a prospective multicenter study of cementless THA with use of 32/36-mm Delta ceramic bearing, Exceed ABT metal shell and Taperloc stem. We evaluated ceramic fracture, noise, clinical results, radiological changes and survival rate at a minimum of 5-year follow-up. From April 2010 to February 2012, 246 patients (274 THAs) were enrolled. Among them, 224 patients (130 men and 94 women, 250 hips) were followed-up for 5-8 years (mean 6.0 years). Ceramic malseating or fracture did not occur in any patient. Eight patients (8 hips, 3.2%) reported noise. Mean Harris hip score was 84 points at the latest follow-up. All acetabular and femoral components had bone-ingrown stability. Two hips were revised due to recurrent dislocation and periprosthetic fracture. The survival rate was 99.6% at 8 years postoperatively. Ceramic fractures can be prevented by a use of (1) 32/36-mm Delta ceramic bearing, (2) metal shell with 18° taper angle, and (2) stem with a reduced neck geometry. However, noise remains a concern of the Delta ceramic bearing. Therapeutic level II.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with use of Delta ceramic articulation were successful at medium term follow-up. The use of this newest ceramic has markedly reduced the incidence of ceramic head fractures, but not the incidence of ceramic liner fractures. We tested a hypothesis that the ceramic fractures are prevented by use of a metal shell with 18° inner taper angle and a stem design with a reduced neck geometry.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a prospective multicenter study of cementless THA with use of 32/36-mm Delta ceramic bearing, Exceed ABT metal shell and Taperloc stem. We evaluated ceramic fracture, noise, clinical results, radiological changes and survival rate at a minimum of 5-year follow-up.
RESULTS
RESULTS
From April 2010 to February 2012, 246 patients (274 THAs) were enrolled. Among them, 224 patients (130 men and 94 women, 250 hips) were followed-up for 5-8 years (mean 6.0 years). Ceramic malseating or fracture did not occur in any patient. Eight patients (8 hips, 3.2%) reported noise. Mean Harris hip score was 84 points at the latest follow-up. All acetabular and femoral components had bone-ingrown stability. Two hips were revised due to recurrent dislocation and periprosthetic fracture. The survival rate was 99.6% at 8 years postoperatively.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Ceramic fractures can be prevented by a use of (1) 32/36-mm Delta ceramic bearing, (2) metal shell with 18° taper angle, and (2) stem with a reduced neck geometry. However, noise remains a concern of the Delta ceramic bearing.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
METHODS
Therapeutic level II.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32529389
doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03515-2
pii: 10.1007/s00402-020-03515-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1155-1162Références
Amstutz HC, Thomas BJ, Jinnah R, Kim W, Grogan T, Yale C (1984) Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 66(2):228–241
Anderson IA, Bowden M, Wyatt TP (2005) Stress analysis of hemispherical ceramic hip prosthesis bearings. Med Eng Phys 27(2):115–122
pubmed: 15642507
Aoude AA, Antoniou J, Epure LM, Huk OL, Zukor DJ, Tanzer M (2015) Midterm outcomes of the recently FDA approved ceramic on ceramic bearing in total hip arthroplasty patients under 65 years of age. J Arthroplasty 30(8):1388–1392
pubmed: 25869588
Baek SH, Kim WK, Kim JY, Kim SY (2015) Do alumina matrix composite bearings decrease hip noises and bearing fractures at a minimum of 5 years after THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(12):3796–3802
pubmed: 26126991
pmcid: 4626509
Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15(12):1833–1840
pubmed: 3068365
Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Jt Surg Am 55(8):1629–1632
Carvajal Alba JA, Schiffman ED, Scully SP, Parvataneni HK (2010) Incomplete seating of a metal-backed alumina liner in ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 33(1):15
pubmed: 20055343
DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121:20–32
Dorr LD, Malik A, Dastane M, Wan Z (2009) Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(1):119–127
pubmed: 18979146
Drouin JM, Cales B, Chevalier J, Fantozzi G (1997) Fatigue behavior of zirconia hip joint heads: experimental results and finite element analysis. J Biomed Mater Res 34(2):149–155
pubmed: 9029293
Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH (1987) Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Jt Surg Br 69(1):45–55
Engh CA, Hooten JP Jr, Zettl-Schaffer KF et al (1994) Porous-coated total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 298:89–96
Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE (1990) Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 257:107–128
Fukui K, Kaneuji A, Matsumoto T, Shintani K (2016) Squeaking and microcracks in a delta-delta ceramic coupling: pin-on-disc study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26(3):299–304
pubmed: 26971327
Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:17–27
Ha YC, Koo KH, Jeong ST, Joon Yoo J, Kim YM, Joong Kim H (2007) Cementless alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years: a 5-year minimum follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 22(2):184–188
pubmed: 17275631
Ha YC, Yoo JJ, Lee YK, Kim JY, Koo KH (2012) Acetabular component positioning using anatomic landmarks of the acetabulum. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(12):3515–3523
pubmed: 22777589
pmcid: 3492628
Hamilton WG, McAuley JP, Dennis DA, Murphy JA, Blumenfeld TJ, Politi J (2010) THA with Delta ceramic on ceramic: results of a multicenter investigational device exemption trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(2):358–366
pubmed: 19768515
Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 51(4):737–755
Jarrett CA, Ranawat AS, Bruzzone M, Blum YC, Rodriguez JA, Ranawat CS (2009) The squeaking hip: a phenomenon of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91(6):1344–1349
Ji HM, Kim KC, Lee YK, Ha YC, Koo KH (2012) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial of a posterior approach and a modified lateral approach. J Arthroplasty 27(3):378–385
pubmed: 21802253
Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53(282):457–481
Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS (2016) Alumina Delta-on-alumina delta bearing in cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients aged <50 years. J Arthroplasty 31(10):2209–2214
pubmed: 27067468
Konan S, Alazzawi S, Yoon BH, Cha YH, Koo KH (2019) A focused update on preventing ceramic fractures in hip arthroplasty: is the 'cup' half full? Bone Jt J 101-B(8):897–901
Koo KH, Ha YC, Jung WH, Kim SR, Yoo JJ, Kim HJ (2008) Isolated fracture of the ceramic head after third-generation alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90(2):329–336
Latimer HA, Lachiewicz PF (1996) Porous-coated acetabular components with screw fixation. Five to 10-year results. J Bone Jt Surg Am 78(7):975–981
Lee YK, Ha YC, Jo WL, Kim TY, Jung WH, Koo KH (2016) Could larger diameter of 4th generation ceramic bearing decrease the rate of dislocation after THA? J Orthop Sci 21(3):327–331
pubmed: 26876620
Lee YK, Ha YC, Yoo JI, Jo WL, Kim KC, Koo KH (2017) Mid-term results of the BIOLOX delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 99-B(6):741–748
Lee YK, Ha YC, Yoo JJ, Koo KH, Yoon KS, Kim HJ (2010) Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of ten years, of a previous report. J Bone Jt Surg (American Volume) 92(8):1715–1719
Lee YK, Kim KC, Jo WL, Ha YC, Parvizi J, Koo KH (2017) Effect of inner taper angle of acetabular metal shell on the malseating and dissociation force of ceramic liner. J Arthroplasty 32(4):1360–1362
pubmed: 28007373
Lee YK, Yoon BH, Choi YS, Jo WL, Ha YC, Koo KH (2016) Metal on metal or ceramic on ceramic for cementless total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 31(11):2637–2645 (e2631)
pubmed: 27215192
Lim SJ, Ryu HG, Eun HJ, Park CW, Kwon KB, Park YS (2018) Clinical outcomes and bearing-specific complications following fourth-generation alumina ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: a single-surgeon series of 749 hips at a minimum of 5-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 33(7):2182–2186 (e2181)
pubmed: 29599034
Livermore J, Ilstrup D, Morrey B (1990) Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J Bone Jt Surg Am 72(4):518–528
McAuley JP, Dennis DA, Grostefon J, Hamilton WG (2012) Factors affecting modular acetabular ceramic liner insertion: a biomechanical analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(2):402–409
pubmed: 22125246
Miller AN, Su EP, Bostrom MP, Nestor BJ, Padgett DE (2009) Incidence of ceramic liner malseating in Trident acetabular shell. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(6):1552–1556
pubmed: 19280269
pmcid: 2674179
Rambani R, Kepecs DM, Makinen TJ, Safir OA, Gross AE, Kuzyk PR (2017) Revision total hip arthroplasty for fractured ceramic bearings: a review of best practices for revision cases. J Arthroplasty 32(6):1959–1964
pubmed: 28189439
Salo PP, Honkanen PB, Ivanova I, Reito A, Pajamaki J, Eskelinen A (2017) High prevalence of noise following Delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 99-B(1):44–50
Squire M, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Peindl RD, Odum S (2006) Acetabular component deformation with press-fit fixation. J Arthroplasty 21(6 Suppl 2):72–77
pubmed: 16950065
Traina F, De Fine M, Di Martino A, Faldini C (2013) Fracture of ceramic bearing surfaces following total hip replacement: a systematic review. Biomed Res Int 2013:157247
pubmed: 23844356
pmcid: 3697280
Walter WL, Kurtz SM, Esposito C et al (2011) Retrieval analysis of squeaking alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. J Bone Jt Surg Br 93(12):1597–1601
Woo RY, Morrey BF (1982) Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 64(9):1295–1306
Zhao CC, Qu GX, Yan SG, Cai XZ (2018) Squeaking in fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement and the relationship with prosthesis brands: meta-analysis and systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res 13(1):133
pubmed: 29859126
pmcid: 5984797