Research Integrity Among PhD Students at the Faculty of Medicine: A Comparison of Three Scandinavian Universities.
attitudes
doctoral students
integrity
knowledge
misconduct
practice
science ethics
Journal
Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE
ISSN: 1556-2654
Titre abrégé: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101273949
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
14
6
2020
medline:
18
9
2021
entrez:
14
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study investigates research integrity among PhD students in health sciences at three universities in Scandinavia (Stockholm, Oslo, Odense). A questionnaire with questions on knowledge, attitudes, experiences, and behavior was distributed to PhD students and obtained a response rate of 77.7%. About 10% of the respondents agreed that research misconduct strictly defined (such as fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism, FFP) is common in their area of research, while slightly more agreed that other forms of misconduct is common. A nonnegligible segment of the respondents was willing to fabricate, falsify, or omit contradicting data if they believe that they are right in their overall conclusions. Up to one third reported to have added one or more authors unmerited. Results showed a negative correlation between "good attitudes" and self-reported misconduct and a positive correlation between how frequent respondents thought that misconduct occurs and whether they reported misconduct themselves. This reveals that existing educational and research systems partly fail to foster research integrity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32532174
doi: 10.1177/1556264620929230
pmc: PMC7488824
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
320-329Références
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Jan 05;14:3
pubmed: 23289954
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2016 Sep 27;136(17):1442-7
pubmed: 27686203
BMJ. 2001 Feb 3;322(7281):274-5
pubmed: 11157528
J Med Ethics. 2001 Oct;27(5):344-6
pubmed: 11579193
Dan Med J. 2018 Apr;65(4):
pubmed: 29619924
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 29;11(9):e0163251
pubmed: 27684371
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Oct;21(5):1331-52
pubmed: 25352123
Acad Med. 1992 Nov;67(11):769-75
pubmed: 1418260
Account Res. 2018;25(5):290-300
pubmed: 29874932
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 Oct;12(4):199-205
pubmed: 28707501
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Mar 25;15:25
pubmed: 24666413
J Clin Invest. 2006 Jul;116(7):1740-1
pubmed: 16823470
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Oct;21(5):1181-96
pubmed: 25344843
Acta Oncol. 1999;38(1):107-10
pubmed: 10090697
J Med Ethics. 2010 May;36(5):315-8
pubmed: 20439329
Sci Eng Ethics. 2009 Dec;15(4):545-62
pubmed: 19247809
JAMA. 2013 Feb 20;309(7):723-4
pubmed: 23423420
Nature. 2005 Jun 9;435(7043):737-8
pubmed: 15944677
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016 Nov 21;1:17
pubmed: 29451551
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Oct;13(4):402-411
pubmed: 29985088
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):327-355
pubmed: 30810892
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Oct;10(4):380-8
pubmed: 26333685
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51928
pubmed: 23284820
PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5738
pubmed: 19478950
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 17;10(6):e0127556
pubmed: 26083381