What narrative devices do people with systemic sclerosis use to describe the experience of pain from digital ulcers: a multicentre focus group study at UK scleroderma centres.
pain management
qualitative research
rheumatology
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 06 2020
11 06 2020
Historique:
entrez:
14
6
2020
pubmed:
14
6
2020
medline:
16
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Digital ulcers (DUs) are a common complication in systemic sclerosis (SSc). No existing studies have specifically reported on the qualitative patient experience of DU pain, and our current patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) does not capture the multifaceted painful experience of SSc-DU. Our aim was to examine the patient experience of SSc-DU pain. Focus groups with people diagnosed with SSc who had experienced DUs were conducted using a topic guide developed by people with SSc, experts in SSc and experienced qualitative researchers. Focus groups were continued until data saturation had been reached. The focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, anonymised and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Our current study is an integration of the data from these focus groups to specifically examine the patient experience of DU pain. Three specialist scleroderma units across the UK (Bath, Manchester and London). Four focus groups were undertaken; 29 adults (20 women, 9 men) with SSc and a spectrum of historical DUs participated. We included participants with a diverse demographic (including ethnic) background and disease-related characteristics. Five narrative devices were identified, which encompass how people describe the pain from SSc-DUs: 'Words to express DU-associated pain', 'Descriptions of physical and psychological reactions to pain', 'Comparisons with other painful events', 'Descriptions of factors that exacerbate pain' and 'Descriptions of strategies for coping with the pain'. The experience of SSc-DU pain leads to the use of graphic language and rich description by participants in the focus group setting. Existing SSc-DU outcomes do not adequately capture the patient experiences of SSc-DU pain. Our findings further highlight the multifaceted nature of SSc-DUs and will hopefully support the development of a novel PROM to assess the severity and impact of SSc-DUs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32532783
pii: bmjopen-2020-037568
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037568
pmc: PMC7295424
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e037568Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: JP reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Actelion Pharmaceuticals and personal fees from Sojournix Pharma, outside the submitted work. MH has received speaker honoraria (<US$10 000) from Actelion Pharmaceuticals. JJ, RG-H and AJM do not report any competing interests relevant to the content of this work.
Références
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 May;72(5):723-733
pubmed: 31841265
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Sep;70(9):1373-1384
pubmed: 29473715
J Rheumatol. 2009 Jul;36(7):1470-6
pubmed: 19487271
Br J Health Psychol. 2016 Nov;21(4):973-988
pubmed: 27452426
J Adv Nurs. 1999 Feb;29(2):283-9
pubmed: 10197926
Pain. 1975 Sep;1(3):277-99
pubmed: 1235985
Qual Health Res. 2019 Mar;29(4):484-497
pubmed: 29890886
Physiother Theory Pract. 2018 Oct;34(10):765-772
pubmed: 29319390
Image J Nurs Sch. 1997 Spring;29(1):21-6
pubmed: 9127536
Clin J Pain. 2019 Mar;35(3):212-221
pubmed: 30444733
Clin Med (Lond). 2002 Nov-Dec;2(6):570-1
pubmed: 12528973
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jul;101(1):17-24
pubmed: 18487245
Pain Med. 2018 Jun 1;19(6):1147-1155
pubmed: 28549183
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Feb 07;:
pubmed: 32031630
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Feb;63(2):277-85
pubmed: 20824802
BMC Womens Health. 2018 Mar 2;18(1):47
pubmed: 29499683
Int J Rheum Dis. 2018 Apr;21(4):796-803
pubmed: 27125577
J Rheumatol. 2007 Dec;34(12):2423-30
pubmed: 17985402
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Jan;56(1):14-25
pubmed: 27094599
Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Jan;69(1):214-7
pubmed: 19221115
J Rheumatol. 1988 Feb;15(2):202-5
pubmed: 3361530
Patient. 2018 Oct;11(5):527-537
pubmed: 29915990
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Aug 28;18(1):429
pubmed: 30153808
Scand J Caring Sci. 2000;14(1):29-36
pubmed: 12035259
J Foot Ankle Res. 2017 Jan 25;10:4
pubmed: 28138340
Int J Nurs Stud. 2002 Jul;39(5):563-72
pubmed: 11996877
Lancet. 2017 Oct 7;390(10103):1685-1699
pubmed: 28413064
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Oct;215:107-114
pubmed: 30219748
J Rheumatol. 2007 Aug;34(8):1718-26
pubmed: 17611983
Pain. 2004 Apr;108(3):209-12
pubmed: 15030939
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2018 Oct;3(3):249-252
pubmed: 30705970
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 May;27(3):e12838
pubmed: 29600524
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Nov;52(4):351-9; discussion 360-1
pubmed: 16268838
Musculoskeletal Care. 2013 Sep;11(3):168-78
pubmed: 23532980
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jun;70(6):1074-9
pubmed: 21540204
Soc Sci Med. 1999 Dec;49(12):1663-76
pubmed: 10574237
Br J Health Psychol. 2016 Feb;21(1):190-203
pubmed: 26333530
Pain Manag Nurs. 2002 Dec;3(4):154-60
pubmed: 12454807
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Apr;48(5):888-894
pubmed: 30205981
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 Jun;48 Suppl 3:iii19-24
pubmed: 19487218
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2019 Sep 2;80(9):530-536
pubmed: 31498665
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907
pubmed: 29937585
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Jan;63(1):142-9
pubmed: 20740608
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Mar 15;61(3):353-60
pubmed: 19248131
J Rheumatol. 2014 Jul;41(7):1317-23
pubmed: 24931950
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Apr;56:27-36
pubmed: 26772655
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51
pubmed: 24979285