Health-Related Quality of Life in MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib plus an Aromatase Inhibitor as Initial Therapy in HR+, HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer.


Journal

The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2020
Historique:
received: 04 02 2020
accepted: 21 05 2020
pubmed: 15 6 2020
medline: 22 6 2021
entrez: 15 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

MONARCH 3, a phase III trial (NCT02246621) of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC), previously demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival in patients receiving abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI). This study evaluated patient-reported outcomes, including global health-related quality of life (HRQoL), functioning, and symptoms. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive abemaciclib (150 mg twice daily; n = 328) or placebo (n = 165), plus 1 mg anastrozole or 2.5 mg letrozole daily. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 and Breast Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire HRQoL instruments were administered at baseline, every two cycles during cycles 2 through 19 (each cycle being 28 days), every three cycles thereafter, and once at a short-term posttherapy follow-up visit (approximately 30 days after discontinuation). Longitudinal mixed regression and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated postbaseline change and time to sustained deterioration (TTSD), respectively. Baseline scores were similar between treatment arms. Although select scores statistically favored the placebo arm, global HRQoL, most symptoms, and functioning scales did not meet the threshold for clinically meaningful differences between treatment arms. Only diarrhea favored the placebo arm with statistically and clinically meaningful differences. There were no TTSD differences between treatment arms for global HRQoL, most symptoms (except diarrhea), or functioning. Over a 2-year period, there were no clinically meaningful differences in global HRQoL, functioning, and most symptoms for patients receiving abemaciclib plus NSAI compared with NSAI alone. Only diarrhea favored the placebo arm, consistent with prior safety data, which has been shown to be manageable and reversible. Combined with clinical efficacy, results support treatment with abemaciclib plus NSAI for postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC. The addition of abemaciclib to a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) was not associated with a clinically meaningful detriment in patient-reported global health-related quality of life, functioning, and most symptoms in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Prior studies have also demonstrated clinical efficacy of abemaciclib plus NSAI compared with NSAI alone, including improved progression-free survival and objective response rate. These results also complement previously reported toxicity data, as measured by investigator-assessed adverse events. Taken together, these results support treatment with abemaciclib plus NSAI for postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
MONARCH 3, a phase III trial (NCT02246621) of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC), previously demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival in patients receiving abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI). This study evaluated patient-reported outcomes, including global health-related quality of life (HRQoL), functioning, and symptoms.
METHODS
Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive abemaciclib (150 mg twice daily; n = 328) or placebo (n = 165), plus 1 mg anastrozole or 2.5 mg letrozole daily. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 and Breast Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire HRQoL instruments were administered at baseline, every two cycles during cycles 2 through 19 (each cycle being 28 days), every three cycles thereafter, and once at a short-term posttherapy follow-up visit (approximately 30 days after discontinuation). Longitudinal mixed regression and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated postbaseline change and time to sustained deterioration (TTSD), respectively.
RESULTS
Baseline scores were similar between treatment arms. Although select scores statistically favored the placebo arm, global HRQoL, most symptoms, and functioning scales did not meet the threshold for clinically meaningful differences between treatment arms. Only diarrhea favored the placebo arm with statistically and clinically meaningful differences. There were no TTSD differences between treatment arms for global HRQoL, most symptoms (except diarrhea), or functioning.
CONCLUSION
Over a 2-year period, there were no clinically meaningful differences in global HRQoL, functioning, and most symptoms for patients receiving abemaciclib plus NSAI compared with NSAI alone. Only diarrhea favored the placebo arm, consistent with prior safety data, which has been shown to be manageable and reversible. Combined with clinical efficacy, results support treatment with abemaciclib plus NSAI for postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
The addition of abemaciclib to a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) was not associated with a clinically meaningful detriment in patient-reported global health-related quality of life, functioning, and most symptoms in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Prior studies have also demonstrated clinical efficacy of abemaciclib plus NSAI compared with NSAI alone, including improved progression-free survival and objective response rate. These results also complement previously reported toxicity data, as measured by investigator-assessed adverse events. Taken together, these results support treatment with abemaciclib plus NSAI for postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32536013
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0084
pmc: PMC7485333
doi:

Substances chimiques

Aminopyridines 0
Aromatase Inhibitors 0
Benzimidazoles 0
Receptors, Estrogen 0
abemaciclib 60UAB198HK
Receptor, ErbB-2 EC 2.7.10.1

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e1346-e1354

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AlphaMed Press.

Références

Ann Oncol. 2017 Jan 1;28(1):16-33
pubmed: 28177437
BMC Cancer. 2016 Dec 6;16(1):937
pubmed: 27923357
Ann Oncol. 2018 Dec 1;29(12):2288-2295
pubmed: 30304498
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jan;107:153-163
pubmed: 30576971
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Aug 20;30(24):3012-9
pubmed: 22802313
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jun;151(3):679-86
pubmed: 25981897
Invest New Drugs. 2014 Oct;32(5):825-37
pubmed: 24919854
Ann Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;29(8):1634-1657
pubmed: 30032243
Ann Oncol. 2018 Dec 1;29(12):2286-2287
pubmed: 30445575
Clin J Pain. 2011 Feb;27(2):116-24
pubmed: 20890182
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;35(25):2875-2884
pubmed: 28580882
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):139-44
pubmed: 9440735
Ann Oncol. 2016 Jun;27(6):1047-1054
pubmed: 27029704
Oncologist. 2020 Feb;25(2):e243-e251
pubmed: 32043763
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 10;35(32):3638-3646
pubmed: 28968163
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Feb;107(6):85-91
pubmed: 20204119
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76
pubmed: 8433390
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 May;14(5 Suppl):641-4
pubmed: 27226503
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 1;23(17):5218-5224
pubmed: 28533223
Cancer Discov. 2016 Jul;6(7):740-53
pubmed: 27217383
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Oct;14(10):2756-68
pubmed: 8874337
Ann Oncol. 2018 Apr 1;29(4):888-894
pubmed: 29360932
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Sep 29;:
pubmed: 31563959
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2019 Jan 17;5:5
pubmed: 30675515
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Apr 28;106(5):
pubmed: 24777111
Qual Life Res. 2015 Jan;24(1):5-18
pubmed: 24277234

Auteurs

Matthew P Goetz (MP)

Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Miguel Martin (M)

Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, Ciberonc, Geicam, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.

Eriko Tokunaga (E)

National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.

In Hae Park (IH)

National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of South Korea.

Jens Huober (J)

Breast Center, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Masakazu Toi (M)

Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Clemens Stoffregen (C)

Eli Lilly & Co., Bad Homburg, Germany.

Sarah Shekarriz (S)

Eli Lilly & Co., Bad Homburg, Germany.

Valerie Andre (V)

Eli Lilly & Co., Paris, France.

M Corona Gainford (MC)

Eli Lilly & Co., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Gregory L Price (GL)

Eli Lilly & Co., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Stephen Johnston (S)

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH