Long-term clinical outcomes of losartan in patients with Marfan syndrome: follow-up of the multicentre randomized controlled COMPARE trial.
Angiotensin-II receptor blocker
Losartan
Marfan syndrome
β-blocker
Journal
European heart journal
ISSN: 1522-9645
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8006263
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 11 2020
14 11 2020
Historique:
received:
04
12
2019
accepted:
24
04
2020
revised:
07
02
2020
pubmed:
18
6
2020
medline:
11
5
2021
entrez:
18
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The COMPARE trial showed a small but significant beneficial effect of 3-year losartan treatment on aortic root dilatation rate in adults with Marfan syndrome (MFS). However, no significant effect was found on clinical endpoints, possibly due to a short follow-up period. The aim of the current study was therefore to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes after losartan treatment. In the original COMPARE study (inclusion 2008-2009), adult patients with MFS (n = 233) were randomly allocated to either the angiotensin-II receptor blocker losartan® on top of regular treatment (β-blockers in 71% of the patients) or no additional medication. After the COMPARE trial period of 3 years, study subjects chose to continue their losartan medication or not. In a median follow-up period of 8 years, 75 patients continued losartan medication, whereas 78 patients, originally allocated to the control group, never used losartan after inclusion. No differences existed between baseline characteristics of the two groups except for age at inclusion [losartan 34 (interquartile range, IQR 26-43) years, control 41 (IQR 30-52) years; P = 0.031], and β-blocker use (losartan 81%, control 64%; P = 0.022). A pathological FBN1 mutation was present in 76% of patients and 58% of the patients were male. Clinical endpoints, defined as all-cause mortality, aortic dissection/rupture, elective aortic root replacement, reoperation, and vascular graft implantation beyond the aortic root, were compared between the two groups. A per-patient composite endpoint was also analysed. Five deaths, 14 aortic dissections, 23 aortic root replacements, 3 reoperations, and 3 vascular graft implantations beyond the aortic root occurred during follow-up. Except for aortic root replacement, all endpoints occurred in patients with an operated aortic root. Patients who used losartan during the entire follow-up period showed a reduced number of events compared to the control group (death: 0 vs. 5, P = 0.014; aortic dissection: 3 vs. 11, P = 0.013; elective aortic root replacement: 10 vs. 13, P = 0.264; reoperation: 1 vs. 2, P = 0.463; vascular graft implantations beyond the aortic root 0 vs. 3, P = 0.071; and composite endpoint: 14 vs. 26, P = 0.019). These results remained similar when corrected for age and β-blocker use in a multivariate analysis. These results suggest a clinical benefit of combined losartan and β-blocker treatment in patients with MFS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32548624
pii: 5858321
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa377
pmc: PMC7711887
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers
0
Losartan
JMS50MPO89
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4181-4187Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Références
J Pediatr. 2007 Jan;150(1):77-82
pubmed: 17188619
Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Mar;88(3):271-6
pubmed: 23321647
Trials. 2010 Jan 12;11:3
pubmed: 20067609
Eur Heart J. 2013 Dec;34(45):3491-500
pubmed: 23999449
N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 27;371(22):2061-71
pubmed: 25405392
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jan 27;65(3):246-54
pubmed: 25614422
Science. 2006 Apr 7;312(5770):117-21
pubmed: 16601194
N Engl J Med. 1994 May 12;330(19):1335-41
pubmed: 8152445
Eur Heart J. 2015 Aug 21;36(32):2160-6
pubmed: 25935877
Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1453-7
pubmed: 18064739
Am J Cardiol. 1995 Jan 15;75(2):157-60
pubmed: 7810492
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Feb 1;99(3):406-9
pubmed: 17261408
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 2;72(14):1613-1618
pubmed: 30261963
N Engl J Med. 1972 Apr 13;286(15):804-8
pubmed: 5011789
Circulation. 1995 Feb 1;91(3):728-33
pubmed: 7828300
Am Heart J. 2015 May;169(5):605-12
pubmed: 25965707
Eur Heart J. 2016 Mar 21;37(12):978-85
pubmed: 26518245
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2009 Apr;10(4):354-62
pubmed: 19430350
Genet Med. 2014 Aug;16(8):576-87
pubmed: 24577266
Lancet. 2020 Dec 21;394(10216):2263-2270
pubmed: 31836196