On the Cost of Detection Response Task Performance on Cognitive Load.
cognitive cost
cognitive workload
detection response task
pupil diameter
Journal
Human factors
ISSN: 1547-8181
Titre abrégé: Hum Factors
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0374660
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2021
08 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
20
6
2020
medline:
11
3
2022
entrez:
20
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study investigates the cost of detection response task performance on cognitive load. Measuring system operator's cognitive load is a foremost challenge in human factors and ergonomics. The detection response task is a standardized measure of cognitive load. It is hypothesized that, given its simple reaction time structure, it has no cost on cognitive load. We set out to test this hypothesis by utilizing pupil diameter as an alternative metric of cognitive load. Twenty-eight volunteers completed one of four experimental tasks with increasing levels of cognitive demand (control, 0-back, 1-back, and 2-back) with or without concurrent DRT performance. Pupil diameter was selected as nonintrusive metric of cognitive load. Self-reported workload was also recorded. A significant main effect of DRT presence was found for pupil diameter and self-reported workload. Larger pupil diameter was found when the Results indicate that DRT performance produced an added cost on cognitive load. The magnitude of the change in pupil diameter was comparable to that observed when transitioning from a condition of low task load to one where the 2-back was performed. The significant increase in cognitive load accompanying DRT performance was also reflected in higher self-reported workload. DRT is a valuable tool to measure operator's cognitive load. However, these results advise caution when discounting it as cost-free metric with no added burden on operator's cognitive resources.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVE
This study investigates the cost of detection response task performance on cognitive load.
BACKGROUND
Measuring system operator's cognitive load is a foremost challenge in human factors and ergonomics. The detection response task is a standardized measure of cognitive load. It is hypothesized that, given its simple reaction time structure, it has no cost on cognitive load. We set out to test this hypothesis by utilizing pupil diameter as an alternative metric of cognitive load.
METHOD
Twenty-eight volunteers completed one of four experimental tasks with increasing levels of cognitive demand (control, 0-back, 1-back, and 2-back) with or without concurrent DRT performance. Pupil diameter was selected as nonintrusive metric of cognitive load. Self-reported workload was also recorded.
RESULTS
A significant main effect of DRT presence was found for pupil diameter and self-reported workload. Larger pupil diameter was found when the
CONCLUSION
Results indicate that DRT performance produced an added cost on cognitive load. The magnitude of the change in pupil diameter was comparable to that observed when transitioning from a condition of low task load to one where the 2-back was performed. The significant increase in cognitive load accompanying DRT performance was also reflected in higher self-reported workload.
APPLICATION
DRT is a valuable tool to measure operator's cognitive load. However, these results advise caution when discounting it as cost-free metric with no added burden on operator's cognitive resources.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32552116
doi: 10.1177/0018720820931628
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM