Study protocol of the HYPER-LIV01 trial: a multicenter phase II, prospective and randomized study comparing simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization to portal vein embolization for hypertrophy of the future liver remnant before major hepatectomy for colo-rectal liver metastases.
Adult
Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
Colorectal Neoplasms
/ pathology
Embolization, Therapeutic
/ adverse effects
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hepatectomy
/ adverse effects
Hepatomegaly
/ etiology
Humans
Liver
/ blood supply
Liver Failure
/ etiology
Liver Neoplasms
/ secondary
Liver Regeneration
Male
Middle Aged
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Portal Vein
Postoperative Complications
/ etiology
Preoperative Care
/ methods
Prospective Studies
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Treatment Outcome
Colo-rectal cancer
Liver metastases
Major hepatectomy
Portal vein embolization
Venous deprivation
Journal
BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Jun 2020
19 Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
30
04
2020
accepted:
12
06
2020
entrez:
21
6
2020
pubmed:
21
6
2020
medline:
12
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In patients undergoing major liver resection, portal vein embolization (PVE) has been widely used to induce hypertrophy of the non-embolized liver in order to prevent post-hepatectomy liver failure. PVE is a safe and effective procedure, but does not always lead to sufficient hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR). Hepatic vein(s) embolization has been proposed to improve FLR regeneration when insufficient after PVE. The sequential right hepatic vein embolization (HVE) after right PVE demonstrated an incremental effect on the FLR but it implies two different procedures with no time gain as compared to PVE alone. We have developed the so-called liver venous deprivation (LVD), a combination of PVE and HVE during the same intervention, to optimize the phase of liver preparation before surgery. The main objective of this randomized phase II trial is to compare the percentage of change in FLR volume at 3 weeks after LVD or PVE. Patients eligible to this multicenter prospective randomized phase II study are subjects aged from 18 years old suffering from colo-rectal liver metastases considered as resectable and with non-cirrhotic liver parenchyma. The primary objective is the percentage of change in FLR volume at 3 weeks after LVD or PVE using MRI or CT-Scan. Secondary objectives are assessment of tolerance, post-operative morbidity and mortality, post-hepatectomy liver failure, rate of non-respectability due to insufficient FLR or tumor progression, per-operative difficulties, blood loss, R0 resection rate, post-operative liver volume and overall survival. Objectives of translational research studies are evaluation of pre- and post-operative liver function and determination of biomarkers predictive of liver hypertrophy. Sixty-four patients will be included (randomization ratio 1:1) to detect a difference of 12% at 21 days in FLR volumes between PVE and LVD. Adding HVE to PVE during the same procedure is an innovative and promising approach that may lead to a rapid and major increase in volume and function of the FLR, thereby increasing the rate of resectable patients and limiting the risk of patient's drop-out. This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov on 15th February 2019 (NCT03841305).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In patients undergoing major liver resection, portal vein embolization (PVE) has been widely used to induce hypertrophy of the non-embolized liver in order to prevent post-hepatectomy liver failure. PVE is a safe and effective procedure, but does not always lead to sufficient hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR). Hepatic vein(s) embolization has been proposed to improve FLR regeneration when insufficient after PVE. The sequential right hepatic vein embolization (HVE) after right PVE demonstrated an incremental effect on the FLR but it implies two different procedures with no time gain as compared to PVE alone. We have developed the so-called liver venous deprivation (LVD), a combination of PVE and HVE during the same intervention, to optimize the phase of liver preparation before surgery. The main objective of this randomized phase II trial is to compare the percentage of change in FLR volume at 3 weeks after LVD or PVE.
METHODS
METHODS
Patients eligible to this multicenter prospective randomized phase II study are subjects aged from 18 years old suffering from colo-rectal liver metastases considered as resectable and with non-cirrhotic liver parenchyma. The primary objective is the percentage of change in FLR volume at 3 weeks after LVD or PVE using MRI or CT-Scan. Secondary objectives are assessment of tolerance, post-operative morbidity and mortality, post-hepatectomy liver failure, rate of non-respectability due to insufficient FLR or tumor progression, per-operative difficulties, blood loss, R0 resection rate, post-operative liver volume and overall survival. Objectives of translational research studies are evaluation of pre- and post-operative liver function and determination of biomarkers predictive of liver hypertrophy. Sixty-four patients will be included (randomization ratio 1:1) to detect a difference of 12% at 21 days in FLR volumes between PVE and LVD.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Adding HVE to PVE during the same procedure is an innovative and promising approach that may lead to a rapid and major increase in volume and function of the FLR, thereby increasing the rate of resectable patients and limiting the risk of patient's drop-out.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov on 15th February 2019 (NCT03841305).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32560632
doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07065-z
pii: 10.1186/s12885-020-07065-z
pmc: PMC7304136
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03841305']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
574Subventions
Organisme : Institut National Du Cancer
ID : K17-019
Références
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013 Feb;36(1):25-34
pubmed: 22806245
J Nucl Med. 2010 Feb;51(2):229-36
pubmed: 20080899
World J Surg. 2017 Jul;41(7):1848-1856
pubmed: 28417185
World J Surg. 2007 Feb;31(2):367-74
pubmed: 17219273
Ann Surg. 2009 Apr;249(4):608-16
pubmed: 19300228
Ann Surg. 2012 Mar;255(3):405-14
pubmed: 22330038
Eur Radiol. 2017 Aug;27(8):3343-3352
pubmed: 28101681
Eur Radiol. 2016 Dec;26(12):4259-4267
pubmed: 27090112
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2019 Aug;8(4):329-337
pubmed: 31489302
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 Dec;41(12):1885-1891
pubmed: 30238334
Ann Surg. 2014 Nov;260(5):829-36; discussion 836-8
pubmed: 25379854