Study protocol of the HYPER-LIV01 trial: a multicenter phase II, prospective and randomized study comparing simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization to portal vein embolization for hypertrophy of the future liver remnant before major hepatectomy for colo-rectal liver metastases.


Journal

BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Jun 2020
Historique:
received: 30 04 2020
accepted: 12 06 2020
entrez: 21 6 2020
pubmed: 21 6 2020
medline: 12 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In patients undergoing major liver resection, portal vein embolization (PVE) has been widely used to induce hypertrophy of the non-embolized liver in order to prevent post-hepatectomy liver failure. PVE is a safe and effective procedure, but does not always lead to sufficient hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR). Hepatic vein(s) embolization has been proposed to improve FLR regeneration when insufficient after PVE. The sequential right hepatic vein embolization (HVE) after right PVE demonstrated an incremental effect on the FLR but it implies two different procedures with no time gain as compared to PVE alone. We have developed the so-called liver venous deprivation (LVD), a combination of PVE and HVE during the same intervention, to optimize the phase of liver preparation before surgery. The main objective of this randomized phase II trial is to compare the percentage of change in FLR volume at 3 weeks after LVD or PVE. Patients eligible to this multicenter prospective randomized phase II study are subjects aged from 18 years old suffering from colo-rectal liver metastases considered as resectable and with non-cirrhotic liver parenchyma. The primary objective is the percentage of change in FLR volume at 3 weeks after LVD or PVE using MRI or CT-Scan. Secondary objectives are assessment of tolerance, post-operative morbidity and mortality, post-hepatectomy liver failure, rate of non-respectability due to insufficient FLR or tumor progression, per-operative difficulties, blood loss, R0 resection rate, post-operative liver volume and overall survival. Objectives of translational research studies are evaluation of pre- and post-operative liver function and determination of biomarkers predictive of liver hypertrophy. Sixty-four patients will be included (randomization ratio 1:1) to detect a difference of 12% at 21 days in FLR volumes between PVE and LVD. Adding HVE to PVE during the same procedure is an innovative and promising approach that may lead to a rapid and major increase in volume and function of the FLR, thereby increasing the rate of resectable patients and limiting the risk of patient's drop-out. This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov on 15th February 2019 (NCT03841305).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In patients undergoing major liver resection, portal vein embolization (PVE) has been widely used to induce hypertrophy of the non-embolized liver in order to prevent post-hepatectomy liver failure. PVE is a safe and effective procedure, but does not always lead to sufficient hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR). Hepatic vein(s) embolization has been proposed to improve FLR regeneration when insufficient after PVE. The sequential right hepatic vein embolization (HVE) after right PVE demonstrated an incremental effect on the FLR but it implies two different procedures with no time gain as compared to PVE alone. We have developed the so-called liver venous deprivation (LVD), a combination of PVE and HVE during the same intervention, to optimize the phase of liver preparation before surgery. The main objective of this randomized phase II trial is to compare the percentage of change in FLR volume at 3 weeks after LVD or PVE.
METHODS METHODS
Patients eligible to this multicenter prospective randomized phase II study are subjects aged from 18 years old suffering from colo-rectal liver metastases considered as resectable and with non-cirrhotic liver parenchyma. The primary objective is the percentage of change in FLR volume at 3 weeks after LVD or PVE using MRI or CT-Scan. Secondary objectives are assessment of tolerance, post-operative morbidity and mortality, post-hepatectomy liver failure, rate of non-respectability due to insufficient FLR or tumor progression, per-operative difficulties, blood loss, R0 resection rate, post-operative liver volume and overall survival. Objectives of translational research studies are evaluation of pre- and post-operative liver function and determination of biomarkers predictive of liver hypertrophy. Sixty-four patients will be included (randomization ratio 1:1) to detect a difference of 12% at 21 days in FLR volumes between PVE and LVD.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
Adding HVE to PVE during the same procedure is an innovative and promising approach that may lead to a rapid and major increase in volume and function of the FLR, thereby increasing the rate of resectable patients and limiting the risk of patient's drop-out.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov on 15th February 2019 (NCT03841305).

Identifiants

pubmed: 32560632
doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07065-z
pii: 10.1186/s12885-020-07065-z
pmc: PMC7304136
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03841305']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Protocol Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

574

Subventions

Organisme : Institut National Du Cancer
ID : K17-019

Références

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013 Feb;36(1):25-34
pubmed: 22806245
J Nucl Med. 2010 Feb;51(2):229-36
pubmed: 20080899
World J Surg. 2017 Jul;41(7):1848-1856
pubmed: 28417185
World J Surg. 2007 Feb;31(2):367-74
pubmed: 17219273
Ann Surg. 2009 Apr;249(4):608-16
pubmed: 19300228
Ann Surg. 2012 Mar;255(3):405-14
pubmed: 22330038
Eur Radiol. 2017 Aug;27(8):3343-3352
pubmed: 28101681
Eur Radiol. 2016 Dec;26(12):4259-4267
pubmed: 27090112
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2019 Aug;8(4):329-337
pubmed: 31489302
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 Dec;41(12):1885-1891
pubmed: 30238334
Ann Surg. 2014 Nov;260(5):829-36; discussion 836-8
pubmed: 25379854

Auteurs

Emmanuel Deshayes (E)

Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, University of Montpellier, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Lauranne Piron (L)

Department of Radiology, Saint Eloi University Hospital, 80 avenue Augustin Fliche, F-34295, Montpellier, France.

Antoine Bouvier (A)

Department of Radiology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.

Bruno Lapuyade (B)

Department of Radiology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.

Emilie Lermite (E)

Department of Liver surgery, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.

Laurent Vervueren (L)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.

Christophe Laurent (C)

Department of Liver surgery, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.

Jean-Baptiste Pinaquy (JB)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.

Patrick Chevallier (P)

Department of Radiology, Nice University Hospital, Nice, France.

Anthony Dohan (A)

Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.

Agnès Rode (A)

Department of Radiology, Croix Rousse Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.

Christian Sengel (C)

Department of Radiology, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France.

Chloé Guillot (C)

Department of Radiology, Saint Eloi University Hospital, 80 avenue Augustin Fliche, F-34295, Montpellier, France.

François Quenet (F)

Department of Surgery, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Boris Guiu (B)

Department of Radiology, Saint Eloi University Hospital, 80 avenue Augustin Fliche, F-34295, Montpellier, France. b-guiu@chu-montpellier.fr.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH