Delivering genome sequencing for rapid genetic diagnosis in critically ill children: parent and professional views, experiences and challenges.
Adolescent
Adult
Child
Child, Preschool
Critical Illness
Early Diagnosis
Female
Genetic Counseling
/ psychology
Genetic Diseases, Inborn
/ diagnosis
Genetic Testing
/ methods
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Personnel
/ psychology
Humans
Infant
Male
Middle Aged
Parents
/ psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Whole Genome Sequencing
/ methods
Journal
European journal of human genetics : EJHG
ISSN: 1476-5438
Titre abrégé: Eur J Hum Genet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9302235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
received:
16
01
2020
accepted:
12
05
2020
revised:
02
04
2020
pubmed:
21
6
2020
medline:
16
6
2021
entrez:
21
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Rapid genomic sequencing (RGS) is increasingly being used in the care of critically ill children. Here we describe a qualitative study exploring parent and professional perspectives around the usefulness of this test, the potential for unintended harms and the challenges for delivering a wider clinical service. The Rapid Paediatric Sequencing (RaPS) study offered trio RGS for diagnosis of critically ill children with a likely monogenic disorder. Main and actionable secondary findings were reported. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents of children offered RGS (n = 11) and professionals (genetic clinicians, non-genetic clinicians, scientists and consenters) (n = 19) by telephone (parents n = 10/professionals n = 1) or face-to-face (parents n = 1/professionals n = 18). We found that participants held largely positive views about RGS, describing clinical and emotional benefits from the opportunity to obtain a rapid diagnosis. Parental stress surrounding their child's illness complicates decision making. Parental concerns are heightened when offered RGS and while waiting for results. The importance of multidisciplinary team working to enable efficient delivery of a rapid service was emphasised. Our findings give insight into the perceived value of RGS for critically ill children. Careful pre-test counselling is needed to support informed parental decision making. Many parents would benefit from additional support while waiting for results. Education of mainstream clinicians is required to facilitate clinical implementation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32561901
doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0667-z
pii: 10.1038/s41431-020-0667-z
pmc: PMC7575551
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1529-1540Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : PB-PG-1014-35016
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Hagen CM, Hansen TW. Deaths in a neonatal intensive care unit: a 10-year perspective. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004;5:463–8.
doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000128893.23327.C1
Weiner J, Sharma J, Lantos J, Kilbride H. How infants die in the neonatal intensive care unit: trends from 1999 through 2008. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165:630–4.
doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.102
Brooten D, Youngblut JM, Caicedo C, Seagrave L, Cantwell GP, Totapally B. Cause of death of infants and children in the intensive care unit: parents’ recall vs chart review. Am J Crit Care. 2016;25:235–42.
doi: 10.4037/ajcc2016233
Saunders CJ, Miller NA, Soden SE, Dinwiddie DL, Noll A, Alnadi NA, et al. Rapid whole-genome sequencing for genetic disease diagnosis in neonatal intensive care units. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:154ra35.
doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004041
Willig LK, Petrikin JE, Smith LD, Saunders CJ, Thiffault I, Miller NA, et al. Whole-genome sequencing for identification of mendelian disorders in critically ill infants: a retrospective analysis of diagnostic and clinical findings. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3:377–87.
doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00139-3
van Diemen CC, Kerstjens-Frederikse WS, Bergman KA, de Koning TJ, Sikkema-Raddatz B, van der Velde JK, et al. Rapid targeted genomics in critically ill newborns. Pediatrics. 2017;140:e20162854.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2854
Meng L, Pammi M, Saronwala A, Magoulas P, Ghazi AR, Vetrini F, et al. Use of exome sequencing for infants in intensive care units: ascertainment of severe single-gene disorders and effect on medical management. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171:e173438.
doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3438
Farnaes L, Hildreth A, Sweeney NM, Clark MM, Chowdhury S, Nahas S, et al. Rapid whole-genome sequencing decreases infant morbidity and cost of hospitalization. NPJ Genom Med. 2018;3:10.
doi: 10.1038/s41525-018-0049-4
Mestek-Boukhibar L, Clement E, Jones WD, Drury S, Ocaka L, Gagunashvili A, et al. Rapid paediatric sequencing (RaPS): comprehensive real-life workflow for rapid diagnosis of critically ill children. J Med Genet. 2018;55:721–8.
doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105396
Stark Z, Lunke S, Brett GR, Tan NB, Stapleton R, Kumble S, et al. Meeting the challenges of implementing rapid genomic testing in acute pediatric care. Genet Med. 2018;20:1554–63.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2018.37
French CE, Delon I, Dolling H, Sanchis-Juan A, Shamardina O, Megy K, et al. Whole genome sequencing reveals that genetic conditions are frequent in intensively ill children. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:627–36.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05552-x
Ayres S, Gallacher L, Stark Z, Brett GR. Genetic counseling in pediatric acute care: reflections on ultra-rapid genomic diagnoses in neonates. J Genet Couns. 2019;28:273–82.
doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1086
Sanford EF, Clark MM, Farnaes L, Williams MR, Perry JC, Ingulli EG, et al. Rapid whole genome sequencing has clinical utility in children in the PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019;20:1007–20.
doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002056
Burke K, Clarke A. The challenge of consent in clinical genome-wide testing. Arch Dis Child. 2016;101:1048–52.
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304109
Berrios C, Koertje C, Noel-MacDonnell J, Soden S, Lantos J. Parents of newborns in the NICU enrolled in genome sequencing research: hopeful, but not naive. Genet Med. 2020;22:416–22.
doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0644-5
Smith EE, du Souich C, Dragojlovic N, Study C, Study R, Elliott AM. Genetic counseling considerations with rapid genome-wide sequencing in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Genet Couns. 2019;28:263–72.
doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1074
Char DS, Lee SS, Magnus D, Cho M. Anticipating uncertainty and irrevocable decisions: provider perspectives on implementing whole-genome sequencing in critically ill children with heart disease. Genet Med. 2018;20:1455–61.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2018.25
Deuitch N, Soo-Jin Lee S, Char D. Translating genomic testing results for pediatric critical care: opportunities for genetic counselors. J Genet Couns. 2019;29:78–87.
doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1182
Knapp B, Decker C, Lantos JD. Neonatologists’ attitudes about diagnostic whole-genome sequencing in the NICU. Pediatrics. 2019;143:S54–7.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-1099J
Stark Z, Nisselle A, McClaren B, Lynch F, Best S, Long JC, et al. Attitudes of Australian health professionals towards rapid genomic testing in neonatal and paediatric intensive care. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019;27:1493–501.
doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0429-y
Kalia SS, Adelman K, Bale SJ, Chung WK, Eng C, Evans JP, et al. Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genet Med. 2017;19:249–55.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.190
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res. 2007;42:1758–72.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x
Gyngell C, Newson AJ, Wilkinson D, Stark Z, Savulescu J. Rapid challenges: ethics and genomic neonatal intensive care. Pediatrics. 2019;143:S14–21.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-1099D
Frankel LA, Pereira S, McGuire AL. Potential psychosocial risks of sequencing newborns. Pediatrics. 2016;137 Suppl 1:S24–9.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3731F
Berenbaum J, Hatcher J. Emotional distress of mothers of hospitalized children. J Pediatr Psychol. 1992;17:359–72.
doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/17.3.359
Stremler R, Haddad S, Pullenayegum E, Parshuram C. Psychological outcomes in parents of critically ill hospitalized children. J Pediatr Nurs. 2017;34:36–43.
doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2017.01.012
Amendola LM, Robinson JO, Hart R, Biswas S, Lee K, Bernhardt BA, et al. Why patients decline genomic sequencing studies: experiences from the cser consortium. J Genet Couns. 2018;27:1220–7.
doi: 10.1007/s10897-018-0243-7
Aubugeau-Williams P, Brierley J. Consent in children’s intensive care: the voices of the parents of critically ill children and those caring for them. J Med Ethics. 2019; Online ahead of print.
Clowes Candadai SV, Sikes MC, Thies JM, Freed AS, Bennett JT. Rapid clinical exome sequencing in a pediatric ICU: Genetic counselor impacts and challenges. J Genet Couns. 2019;28:283–91.
doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1116
Li KC, Birch PH, Garrett BM, MacPhee M, Adam S, Friedman JM. Parents’ perspectives on supporting their decision making in genome-wide sequencing. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2016;48:265–75.
doi: 10.1111/jnu.12207
Lewis C, Sanderson S, Hill M, Patch C, Searle B, Hunter A, et al. Parents’ motivations, concerns and understanding of genome sequencing: a qualitative interview study. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020; Online ahead of print.
Spencer-Tanslet R, Hunter A. Genome sequencing and the NHS. The views of rare disease patients and carers. London: Genomics England; 2019.
Ballard LM, Horton RH, Dheensa S, Fenwick A, Lucassen AM. Exploring broad consent in the context of the 100,000 genomes project: a mixed methods study. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020;28:732–41.
doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0570-7
Sanderson SC, Hill M, Patch C, Searle B, Lewis C, Chitty LS. Delivering genome sequencing in clinical practice: an interview study with healthcare professionals involved in the 100,000 genomes project. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e029699.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029699
Szego MJ, Meyn MS, Shuman C, Zlotnik Shaul R, Anderson JA, Bowdin S, et al. Views from the clinic: healthcare provider perspectives on whole genome sequencing in paediatrics. Eur J Med Genet. 2019;62:350–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.11.029
Hammond CL, Willoughby JM, Parker MJ. Genomics for paediatricians: promises and pitfalls. Arch Dis Child. 2018;103:895–900.
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314558
Lind M, Visentini M, Mäntylä T, Del Missier F. Choice-supportive misremembering: a new taxonomy and review. Front Psychol. 2017;8:2062.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02062
Sturges JE, Hanrahan KJ. Comparing telephone and face-to-face qualitative interviewing: a research note. Qual Res. 2004;4:107–18.
doi: 10.1177/1468794104041110
Mealer M, Jones Rn J. Methodological and ethical issues related to qualitative telephone interviews on sensitive topics. Nurs Res. 2014;21:32–7.
doi: 10.7748/nr2014.03.21.4.32.e1229
Novick G. Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? Res Nurs Health. 2008;31:391–8.
doi: 10.1002/nur.20259