Why does the Chinese public accept evolution?

Acceptance of evolution Chinese public Creative Darwinism Human evolution Science dissemination

Journal

Studies in history and philosophy of science
ISSN: 0039-3681
Titre abrégé: Stud Hist Philos Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 1250602

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2020
Historique:
received: 18 09 2018
revised: 28 04 2019
accepted: 28 07 2019
entrez: 23 6 2020
pubmed: 23 6 2020
medline: 26 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

A substantial proportion of Chinese nationals seem to accept evolution, and the country is sometimes held up to show that the sorry state of evolution acceptance in the United States is not inevitable. Attempts to improve evolution acceptance generally focus on improving communication, curricular reform, and even identifying cognitive mechanisms that bias people against evolution. What is it that the Chinese scientific community did so well, and can it be generalized? This paper argues that evolution acceptance in China has a very specific history, one that other countries are very unlikely to emulate. We show that the interactions among science, education, mass media, social and political movements, and ideological arguments about evolution greatly influenced the Chinese public's understanding and acceptance of evolution. We find that it was not just formal education, but many more ideologically motivated methods of evolution exposure that contributed to the high rate of acceptance. But since the purpose of evolution dissemination has moved beyond merely teaching biology, the Chinese public persists with substantial misunderstandings of the theory. Thus, bottom line percentage of acceptance figures can be misleading; the details and the history really matter.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32568703
pii: S0039-3681(18)30243-7
doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.07.003
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Pagination

116-124

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Auteurs

Jing Zhu (J)

Department of Philosophy, East China Normal University, China. Electronic address: jzhu@philo.ecnu.edu.cn.

Mingjun Zhang (M)

Department of Philosophy, University of Pennsylvania, United States. Electronic address: mingjunz@sas.upenn.edu.

Michael Weisberg (M)

Department of Philosophy, University of Pennsylvania, United States. Electronic address: weisberg@phil.upenn.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH