Radiobiological model-based approach to determine the potential of dose-escalated robust intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy in reducing gastrointestinal toxicity in the treatment of locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer of the head.
Intensity-modulated proton therapy
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Normal tissue complication probability
Pancreatic cancer
Journal
Radiation oncology (London, England)
ISSN: 1748-717X
Titre abrégé: Radiat Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265111
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Jun 2020
22 Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
30
04
2020
accepted:
03
06
2020
entrez:
24
6
2020
pubmed:
24
6
2020
medline:
2
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to determine the potential of escalated dose radiation (EDR) robust intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy (ro-IMPT) in reducing GI toxicity risk in locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAUPC) of the head in term of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) predictive model. For 9 patients, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was compared with ro-IMPT. For all plans, the prescription dose was 59.4GyE (Gray equivalent) in 33 fractions with an equivalent organ at risk (OAR) constraints. Physical dose distribution was evaluated. GI toxicity risk for different endpoints was estimated using published NTCP Lyman Kutcher Burman (LKB) models for stomach, duodenum, small bowel, and combine stomach and duodenum (Stoduo). A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for dosimetry parameters and NTCP values comparison. The dosimetric results have shown that, with similar target coverage, ro-IMPT achieves a significant dose-volume reduction in the stomach, small bowel, and stoduo in low to high dose range in comparison to IMRT. NTCP evaluation for the endpoint gastric bleeding of stomach (10.55% vs. 13.97%, P = 0.007), duodenum (1.87% vs. 5.02%, P = 0.004), and stoduo (5.67% vs. 7.81%, P = 0.008) suggest reduced toxicity by ro-IMPT compared to IMRT. ∆NTCP With similar target coverage and better conformity, ro-IMPT has the potential to substantially reduce the risk of GI toxicity compared to IMRT in EDR of LAUPC of the head. This result needs to be further evaluated in future clinical studies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to determine the potential of escalated dose radiation (EDR) robust intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy (ro-IMPT) in reducing GI toxicity risk in locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAUPC) of the head in term of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) predictive model.
METHODS
METHODS
For 9 patients, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was compared with ro-IMPT. For all plans, the prescription dose was 59.4GyE (Gray equivalent) in 33 fractions with an equivalent organ at risk (OAR) constraints. Physical dose distribution was evaluated. GI toxicity risk for different endpoints was estimated using published NTCP Lyman Kutcher Burman (LKB) models for stomach, duodenum, small bowel, and combine stomach and duodenum (Stoduo). A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for dosimetry parameters and NTCP values comparison.
RESULT
RESULTS
The dosimetric results have shown that, with similar target coverage, ro-IMPT achieves a significant dose-volume reduction in the stomach, small bowel, and stoduo in low to high dose range in comparison to IMRT. NTCP evaluation for the endpoint gastric bleeding of stomach (10.55% vs. 13.97%, P = 0.007), duodenum (1.87% vs. 5.02%, P = 0.004), and stoduo (5.67% vs. 7.81%, P = 0.008) suggest reduced toxicity by ro-IMPT compared to IMRT. ∆NTCP
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
With similar target coverage and better conformity, ro-IMPT has the potential to substantially reduce the risk of GI toxicity compared to IMRT in EDR of LAUPC of the head. This result needs to be further evaluated in future clinical studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32571379
doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01592-6
pii: 10.1186/s13014-020-01592-6
pmc: PMC7310413
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
157Subventions
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
ID : 18ck0106210h0003, 19ck0106485h001
Organisme : National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund
ID : 31-A-17
Références
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Jul 1;44(4):911-9
pubmed: 10386650
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Apr;103(1):25-31
pubmed: 22300608
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jul 1;68(3):801-8
pubmed: 17379445
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jun;28(3):248-255
pubmed: 29933884
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991 May 15;21(1):123-35
pubmed: 2032883
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Aug;92(2):238-43
pubmed: 19454367
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S101-7
pubmed: 20171503
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Mar 1;85(3):e143-9
pubmed: 23200173
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Oct 1;84(2):369-75
pubmed: 22381898
Acta Oncol. 2013 Apr;52(3):498-505
pubmed: 23477361
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Jun;123(3):431-437
pubmed: 28600084
Radiother Oncol. 2013 Jun;107(3):267-73
pubmed: 23759662
Radiother Oncol. 2015 Jan;114(1):117-21
pubmed: 25497876
J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun;49(6):1074-80
pubmed: 23846547
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Dec 1;84(5):1166-71
pubmed: 22543215
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018 Aug;9(4):687-693
pubmed: 30151265
Radiat Res Suppl. 1985;8:S13-9
pubmed: 3867079
Radiat Oncol. 2013 Jun 18;8:145
pubmed: 23773560
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Jun 1;53(2):407-21
pubmed: 12023146
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jul 15;83(4):1120-5
pubmed: 22099048
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018 Apr 13;3(3):314-321
pubmed: 30202800
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 May 1;83(1):158-63
pubmed: 22245197
Am J Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct;34(5):460-5
pubmed: 20881474
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020 Feb;11(1):225-230
pubmed: 32175125
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Nov 15;19(22):4202-8
pubmed: 11709563
Phys Med. 2016 Jan;32(1):248-54
pubmed: 26549777
Lancet. 2004 Mar 27;363(9414):1049-57
pubmed: 15051286
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Nov 22;13(1):228
pubmed: 30466468
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Apr 1;91(5):892-4
pubmed: 25832682
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Dec;141:267-274
pubmed: 31492443
J Radiat Res. 2007;48 Suppl A:A75-80
pubmed: 17513902
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Aug;17(8):2092-101
pubmed: 20224860
Acta Oncol. 2017 Nov;56(11):1379-1386
pubmed: 28918679
Med Phys. 2014 Aug;41(8):081711
pubmed: 25086521