A basal ganglia-like cortical-amygdalar-hypothalamic network mediates feeding behavior.
Animals
Basal Ganglia
/ physiology
Behavior, Animal
Central Amygdaloid Nucleus
Cerebral Cortex
/ pathology
Feeding Behavior
/ physiology
Hypothalamus
/ physiology
Male
Mice
Models, Animal
Neural Pathways
/ physiology
Neurons
/ metabolism
Olfactory Cortex
/ physiology
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Subthalamic Nucleus
basal ganglia
central amygdala nucleus
hypothalamus
insular cortex
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 07 2020
07 07 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
24
6
2020
medline:
9
9
2020
entrez:
24
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The insular cortex (INS) is extensively connected to the central nucleus of the amygdala (CEA), and both regions send convergent projections into the caudal lateral hypothalamus (LHA) encompassing the parasubthalamic nucleus (PSTN). However, the organization of the network between these structures has not been clearly delineated in the literature, although there has been an upsurge in functional studies related to these structures, especially with regard to the cognitive and psychopathological control of feeding. We conducted tract-tracing experiments from the INS and observed a pathway to the PSTN region that runs parallel to the canonical hyperdirect pathway from the isocortex to the subthalamic nucleus (STN) adjacent to the PSTN. In addition, an indirect pathway with a relay in the central amygdala was also observed that is similar in its structure to the classic indirect pathway of the basal ganglia that also targets the STN. C-Fos experiments showed that the PSTN complex reacts to neophobia and sickness induced by lipopolysaccharide or cisplatin. Chemogenetic (designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs [DREADD]) inhibition of tachykininergic neurons (Tac1) in the PSTN revealed that this nucleus gates a stop "no-eat" signal to refrain from feeding when the animal is subjected to sickness or exposed to a previously unknown source of food. Therefore, our anatomical findings in rats and mice indicate that the INS-PSTN network is organized in a similar manner as the hyperdirect and indirect basal ganglia circuitry. Functionally, the PSTN is involved in gating feeding behavior, which is conceptually homologous to the motor no-go response of the adjacent STN.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32571909
pii: 2004914117
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2004914117
pmc: PMC7354999
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
15967-15976Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no competing interest.
Références
J Comp Neurol. 1990 Apr 22;294(4):607-22
pubmed: 2341628
Neuron. 2013 Jul 24;79(2):361-74
pubmed: 23810540
Neurosci Res. 2006 Nov;56(3):261-9
pubmed: 16935375
J Comp Neurol. 1947 Aug;87(1):1-16
pubmed: 20256274
J Comp Neurol. 2004 Feb 16;469(4):581-607
pubmed: 14755537
Neuroscience. 1999 Jan;88(2):521-34
pubmed: 10197772
Neuropharmacology. 2020 May 1;167:107703
pubmed: 31299228
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Jun;10(6):466
pubmed: 19455175
J Comp Neurol. 2016 Oct 1;524(14):2803-27
pubmed: 26918800
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Oct;114(4):2500-8
pubmed: 26334021
Trends Neurosci. 1989 Oct;12(10):366-75
pubmed: 2479133
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Apr;985:185-205
pubmed: 12724159
J Comp Neurol. 2011 Dec 1;519(17):3507-31
pubmed: 21800302
Cell. 2017 Jan 12;168(1-2):311-324.e18
pubmed: 28086095
Nature. 2018 Mar 29;555(7698):617-622
pubmed: 29562230
Brain Struct Funct. 2019 Jan;224(1):293-314
pubmed: 30315416
Behav Brain Res. 2012 Dec 1;235(2):182-8
pubmed: 22884404
Brain Struct Funct. 2017 Sep;222(7):2961-2991
pubmed: 28258483
Neuropharmacology. 2015 Dec;99:566-76
pubmed: 26318100
Brain Res Bull. 1988 Feb;20(2):257-60
pubmed: 2453258
Dev Biol. 2004 Mar 1;267(1):93-108
pubmed: 14975719
Neuron. 2017 Mar 22;93(6):1464-1479.e5
pubmed: 28334609
J Comp Neurol. 1982 Jul 10;208(4):401-18
pubmed: 7119168
J Comp Neurol. 2008 Jan 10;506(2):263-87
pubmed: 18022956
Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 1986;100:1-178
pubmed: 3788679
J Comp Neurol. 1988 Nov 15;277(3):347-64
pubmed: 2461973
Brain Struct Funct. 2018 Jan;223(1):391-414
pubmed: 28852859
Elife. 2018 Aug 28;7:
pubmed: 30149836
Brain Res. 1997 Jul 25;763(2):247-54
pubmed: 9296566
Mol Cell Neurosci. 2013 Jan;52:128-39
pubmed: 23147109
Mol Cell Neurosci. 2008 Apr;37(4):696-707
pubmed: 18206388
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Oct;20(10):1384-1394
pubmed: 28825719
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2004 Jul;10(5):293-6
pubmed: 15196508
Brain Struct Funct. 2020 Mar;225(2):551-565
pubmed: 31858235
Neurosci Bull. 2016 Apr;32(2):191-201
pubmed: 26898298
J Neurosci. 2015 Mar 18;35(11):4582-6
pubmed: 25788675
Science. 1994 Sep 23;265(5180):1826-31
pubmed: 8091209
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 10;106(45):19156-61
pubmed: 19850874
Neuron. 2018 Nov 21;100(4):891-899.e5
pubmed: 30344042
Nature. 2013 Nov 7;503(7474):111-4
pubmed: 24121436
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2017;136:151-175
pubmed: 29056150
J Neurochem. 2000 Nov;75(5):1818-25
pubmed: 11032870
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Sep;56:315-29
pubmed: 26255593
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2008 Apr;294(4):R1276-84
pubmed: 18287224
J Neurosci. 2013 Mar 13;33(11):4804-14
pubmed: 23486951
Neuroendocrinology. 1989 Oct;50(4):433-46
pubmed: 2554178
J Neurosci. 1996 Apr 15;16(8):2671-83
pubmed: 8786443
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2015 Mar;119:77-84
pubmed: 25617666
Neurosci Bull. 2020 Jun;36(6):585-597
pubmed: 32096114
Neuroscience. 1993 Nov;57(1):113-42
pubmed: 8278047
Trends Neurosci. 1998 Aug;21(8):323-31
pubmed: 9720596
Brain Struct Funct. 2016 May;221(4):2183-208
pubmed: 25863939
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2020 Feb;26(1):12-24
pubmed: 31996619
J Neurosci. 2009 Dec 2;29(48):15205-12
pubmed: 19955373
Prog Brain Res. 2012;195:123-63
pubmed: 22230626