Metamorphosis shapes cranial diversity and rate of evolution in salamanders.


Journal

Nature ecology & evolution
ISSN: 2397-334X
Titre abrégé: Nat Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101698577

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2020
Historique:
received: 11 09 2019
accepted: 14 05 2020
pubmed: 24 6 2020
medline: 22 10 2020
entrez: 24 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Metamorphosis is widespread across the animal kingdom and induces fundamental changes in the morphology, habitat and resources used by an organism during its lifetime. Metamorphic species are likely to experience more dynamic selective pressures through ontogeny compared with species with single-phase life cycles, which may drive divergent evolutionary dynamics. Here, we reconstruct the cranial evolution of the salamander using geometric morphometric data from 148 species spanning the order's full phylogenetic, developmental and ecological diversity. We demonstrate that life cycle influences cranial shape diversity and rate of evolution. Shifts in the rate of cranial evolution are consistently associated with transitions from biphasic to either direct-developing or paedomorphic life cycle strategies. Direct-developers exhibit the slowest rates of evolution and the lowest disparity, and paedomorphic species the highest. Species undergoing complete metamorphosis (biphasic and direct-developing) exhibit greater cranial modularity (evolutionary independence among regions) than do paedomorphic species, which undergo differential metamorphosis. Biphasic and direct-developing species also display elevated disparity relative to the evolutionary rate for bones associated with feeding, whereas this is not the case for paedomorphic species. Metamorphosis has profoundly influenced salamander cranial evolution, requiring greater autonomy of cranial elements and facilitating the rapid evolution of regions that are remodelled through ontogeny. Rather than compounding functional constraints on variation, metamorphosis seems to have promoted the morphological evolution of salamanders over 180 million years, which may explain the ubiquity of this complex life cycle strategy across disparate organisms.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32572219
doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1225-3
pii: 10.1038/s41559-020-1225-3
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1129-1140

Références

Hanken, J. Development and evolution in amphibians. Am. Sci. 77, 336–343 (1989).
Raff, R. A. & Raff, E. C. Development as an Evolutionary Process (Alan R. Liss, 1987).
Bhullar, B.-A. S. et al. Birds have paedomorphic dinosaur skulls. Nature 487, 223–226 (2012).
pubmed: 22722850
Alberch, P. in Environmental Adaptation and Evolution (eds Mossakowski, D. & Roth, G.) 19–36 (Gustav Fischer, 1982).
Roth, G. in Environmental Adaptation and Evolution (eds Mossakowski, D. & Roth, G.) 37–48 (Gustav Fischer, 1982).
Haeckel, E. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen Vols. 1 and 2 (G. Reimer, 1866).
Duméril, A. Reproduction, dans la Ménagerie des Reptiles au Musée d’Histoire Naturelle, des axolotls, batraciens urodèles à branchies persistantes, du Mexique (Sirenodon mexicanus vel Humboldtii), qui n’avaient encore jamais été vus vivants en Europe. C. R. Acad. Sci. 60, 765–767 (1865).
Laudet, V. The origins and evolution of vertebrate metamorphosis. Curr. Biol. 21, R726–R737 (2011).
pubmed: 21959163
Mora, C., Tittensor, D. P., Adl, S., Simpson, A. G. B. & Worm, B. How many species are there on Earth and in the ocean? PLoS Biol. 9, e1001127 (2011).
pubmed: 21886479 pmcid: 3160336
McMenamin, S. K. & Parichy, D. M. in Current Topics in Developmental Biology Vol. 103 (ed. Shi, Y.-B.) 127–165 (Academic Press, 2013).
McMahon, D. P. & Hayward, A. Why grow up? A perspective on insect strategies to avoid metamorphosis. Ecol. Entomol. 41, 505–515 (2016).
Rainford, J. L., Hofreiter, M., Nicholson, D. B. & Mayhew, P. J. Phylogenetic distribution of extant richness suggests metamorphosis is a key innovation driving diversification in insects. PLoS ONE 9, e109085 (2014).
pubmed: 25275450 pmcid: 4183542
Rolff, J., Johnston, P. R. & Reynolds, S. Complete metamorphosis of insects. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 374, 20190063 (2019).
Truman, J. W. & Riddiford, L. M. The evolution of insect metamorphosis: a developmental and endocrine view. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 374, 20190070 (2019).
Bonner, J. T. Size and Cycle—an Essay on the Structure of Biology (Princeton Univ. Press, 1965).
Ebenman, B. Niche differences between age classes and intraspecific competition in age-structured populations. J. Theor. Biol. 124, 25–33 (1987).
Felice, R. N., Randau, M. & Goswami, A. A fly in a tube: macroevolutionary expectations for integrated phenotypes. Evolution 72, 2580–2594 (2018).
pubmed: 30246245 pmcid: 6585935
Hansen, T. F. Is modularity necessary for evolvability? Remarks on the relationship between pleiotropy and evolvability. BioSystems 69, 83–94 (2003).
pubmed: 12689723
Drake, A. G. & Klingenberg, C. P. Large‐scale diversification of skull shape in domestic dogs: disparity and modularity. Am. Nat. 175, 289–301 (2010).
pubmed: 20095825
Klingenberg, C. P. Studying morphological integration and modularity at multiple levels: concepts and analysis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 369, 20130249 (2014).
Ebenman, B. Evolution in organisms that change their niches during the life cycle. Am. Nat. 139, 990–1021 (1992).
Moran, N. A. Adaptation and constraint in the complex life cycles of animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 25, 573–600 (1994).
Wollenberg Valero, K. C. et al. Transcriptomic and macroevolutionary evidence for phenotypic uncoupling between frog life history phases. Nat. Commun. 8, 15213 (2017).
pubmed: 28504275 pmcid: 5440664
Goedert, D. & Calsbeek, R. Experimental evidence that metamorphosis alleviates genomic conflict. Am. Nat. 194, 356–366 (2019).
pubmed: 31553218
Bonett, R. M. & Blair, A. L. Evidence for complex life cycle constraints on salamander body form diversification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 9936–9941 (2017).
pubmed: 28851828
Vučić, T. et al. Testing the evolutionary constraints of metamorphosis: the ontogeny of head shape in Triturus newts. Evolution 73, 1253–1264 (2019).
pubmed: 30990882
Wake, D. B. & Koo, M. S. Amphibians. Curr. Biol. 28, R1237–R1241 (2018).
pubmed: 30399342
Ziermann, J. M. in Heads, Jaws, and Muscles (eds Ziermann, J., Diaz Jr, R. E. & Diogo, R.) 143–170 (Springer, 2019).
Bonett, R. M. in Evolutionary Developmental Biology (eds Nuño de la Rosa, L. & Müller, G. B.) 1–14 (Springer, 2018).
Bonett, R. M., Chippindale, P. T., Moler, P. E., Wayne, V. D. R. & Wake, D. B. Evolution of gigantism in amphiumid salamanders. PLoS ONE 4, e5615 (2009).
pubmed: 19461997 pmcid: 2680017
Bonett, R. M., Steffen, M. A., Lambert, S. M., Wiens, J. J. & Chippindale, P. T. Evolution of paedomorphosis in plethodontid salamanders: ecological correlates and re-evolution of metamorphosis. Evolution 68, 466–482 (2013).
pubmed: 24102140
Chippindale, P. T., Bonett, R. M., Baldwin, A. S. & Wiens, J. J. Phylogenetic evidence for a major reversal of life-history evolution in plethodontid salamanders. Evolution 58, 2809–2822 (2004).
pubmed: 15696758
Ledbetter, N. M. & Bonett, R. M. Terrestriality constrains salamander limb diversification: implications for the evolution of pentadactyly. J. Evol. Biol. 32, 642–652 (2019).
pubmed: 30891861
Blankers, T., Adams, D. C. & Wiens, J. J. Ecological radiation with limited morphological diversification in salamanders. J. Evol. Biol. 25, 634–646 (2012).
pubmed: 22268991
Hanken, J. & Hall, B. K. The Skull: Patterns of Structural and Systematic Diversity Vol. 2 (Univ. of Chicago Press, 1993).
Vassilieva, A. B., Lai, J.-S., Yang, S.-F., Chang, Y.-H. & Poyarkov, N. A. J. Development of the bony skeleton in the Taiwan salamander, Hynobius formosanus Maki, 1922 (Caudata: Hynobiidae): heterochronies and reductions. Vert. Zool. 65, 117–130 (2015).
Truman, J. W. & Riddiford, L. M. The origins of insect metamorphosis. Nature 401, 447–452 (1999).
pubmed: 10519548
Taylor, M. A. How tetrapods feed in water: a functional analysis by paradigm. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 91, 171–195 (1987).
Schwenk, K. Feeding: Form, Function, and Evolution in Tetrapod Vertebrates (Academic Press, 2000).
Bels, V. & Whishaw, I. Q. Feeding in Vertebrates: Evolution, Morphology, Behavior, Biomechanics (Springer, 2019).
Duellman, W. E. & Trueb, L. Biology of Amphibians (McGraw-Hill, 1986).
Johnson, C. K. & Voss, S. R. Salamander paedomorphosis: linking thyroid hormone to life history and life cycle evolution. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 103, 229–257 (2013).
pubmed: 23347521
Wilbur, H. M. & Collins, J. P. Ecological aspects of amphibian metamorphosis. Science 182, 1305–1314 (1973).
pubmed: 17733097
Clavel, J. & Morlon, H. Accelerated body size evolution during cold climatic periods in the Cenozoic. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 4183–4188 (2017).
pubmed: 28373536
Botero, C. A., Dor, R., McCain, C. M. & Safran, R. J. Environmental harshness is positively correlated with intraspecific divergence in mammals and birds. Mol. Ecol. 23, 259–268 (2014).
pubmed: 24283535
Laurin, M. Assessment of modularity in the urodele skull: an exploratory analysis using ossification sequence data. J. Exp. Zool. B 322, 567–585 (2014).
Ivanović, A. & Kalezić, M. L. Testing the hypothesis of morphological integration on a skull of a vertebrate with a biphasic life cycle: a case study of the alpine newt. J. Exp. Zool. B 314B, 527–538 (2010).
Kerney, R. R., Blackburn, D. C., Müller, H. & Hanken, J. Do larval traits re-evolve? Evidence from the embryogenesis of a direct-developing salamander, Plethodon cinereus. Evolution 66, 252–262 (2012).
pubmed: 22220879
Bon, M., Bardua, C., Goswami, A. & Fabre, A.-C. Cranial integration in the fire salamander, Salamandra salamandra (Caudata: Salamandridae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 130, 178–194 (2020).
Wake, D. B. Comparative osteology and evolution of the lungless salamanders, family Plethodontidae. Mem. Calif. Acad. Sci. 4, 1–111 (1966).
Reilly, S. M. Ontogeny of cranial ossification in the eastern newt, Notophthalmus viridescens (Caudata: Salamandridae), and its relationship to metamorphosis and neoteny. J. Morphol. 188, 315–326 (1986).
pubmed: 3735436
Ultsch, G. R. & Duke, J. T. Gas exchange and habitat selection in the aquatic salamanders Necturus maculosus and Cryptobranchus alleganiensis. Oecologia 83, 250–258 (1990).
pubmed: 22160119
Hanken, J. Life-history and morphological evolution. J. Evol. Biol. 5, 549–557 (1992).
Dinis, M. & Velo-Antón, G. How little do we know about the reproductive mode in the north African salamander, Salamandra algira? Pueriparity in divergent mitochondrial lineages of S. a. tingitana. Amphib. Reptil. 38, 540–546 (2017).
Kraemer, A. C. & Adams, D. C. Predator perception of Batesian mimicry and conspicuousness in a salamander. Evolution 68, 1197–1206 (2014).
pubmed: 24274647
Heiss, E. & Grell, J. Same but different: aquatic prey capture in paedomorphic and metamorphic alpine newts. Zool. Lett. 5, 5–24 (2019).
Bookstein, F. L. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Med. Image Anal. 1, 225–243 (1997).
pubmed: 9873908
Gunz, P., Mitteroecker, P. & Bookstein, F. L. in Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology (ed. Slice, D. E.) 73–98 (Springer, 2005).
Bardua, C., Felice, R. N., Watanabe, A., Fabre, A. C. & Goswami, A. A practical guide to sliding and surface semilandmarks in morphometric analyses. Integr. Organism. Biol. 1, 1–34 (2019).
Parr, W. C. et al. Toward integration of geometric morphometrics and computational biomechanics: new methods for 3D virtual reconstruction and quantitative analysis of finite element models. J. Theor. Biol. 301, 1–14 (2012).
pubmed: 22342680
Wiley, D. F. et al. Evolutionary morphing. In Proc. IEEE Visualization 2005 (VIS’05) 23–28 October 2005 431–438 (IEEE, 2005).
Dumont, M. et al. Do functional demands associated with locomotor habitat, diet, and activity pattern drive skull shape evolution in musteloid carnivorans? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 117, 858–878 (2016).
Fabre, A. C., Marigo, J., Granatosky, M. C. & Schmitt, D. Functional associations between support use and forelimb shape in strepsirrhines and their relevance to inferring locomotor behavior in early primates. J. Hum. Evol. 108, 11–30 (2017).
pubmed: 28622924
Felice, R. N. & Goswami, A. Developmental origins of mosaic evolution in the avian cranium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 555–560 (2018).
pubmed: 29279399
Watanabe, A. et al. Ecomorphological diversification in squamates from conserved pattern of cranial integration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 14688–14697 (2019).
pubmed: 31262818
Bardua, C., Wilkinson, M., Gower, D. J., Sherratt, E. & Goswami, A. Morphological evolution and modularity of the caecilian skull. BMC Evol. Biol. 19, 30 (2019).
pubmed: 30669965 pmcid: 6343317
Marshall, A. F. et al. High-density three-dimensional morphometric analyses support conserved static (intraspecific) modularity in caecilian (Amphibia: Gymnophiona) crania. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 126, 721–742 (2019).
Botton-Divet, L., Cornette, R., Fabre, A.-C., Herrel, A. & Houssaye, A. Morphological analysis of long bones in semi-aquatic mustelids and their terrestrial relatives. Integr. Comp. Biol. 56, 1298–1309 (2016).
pubmed: 27794537
Schlager, S. in Statistical Shape and Deformation Analysis (eds Zheng, G. et al.) 217–256 (Academic Press, 2017).
Klingenberg, C. Novelty and “homology-free” morphometrics: what’s in a name? Evol. Biol. 35, 186–190 (2008).
Cardini, A. Lost in the other half: improving accuracy in geometric morphometric analyses of one side of bilaterally symmetric structures. Syst. Biol. 65, 1096–1106 (2016).
pubmed: 27288476
Jetz, W. & Pyron, R. A. The interplay of past diversification and evolutionary isolation with present imperilment across the amphibian tree of life. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 850–858 (2018).
pubmed: 29581588
Drummond, A. J. & Rambaut, A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 214 (2007).
pubmed: 17996036 pmcid: 2247476
Heled, J. & Bouckaert, R. R. Looking for trees in the forest: summary tree from posterior samples. BMC Evol. Biol. 13, 221 (2013).
pubmed: 24093883 pmcid: 3853548
Parra-Olea, G. et al. Biology of tiny animals: three new species of minute salamanders (Plethodontidae: Thorius) from Oaxaca, Mexico. PeerJ 4, e2694 (2016).
pubmed: 27896029 pmcid: 5119241
Wang, B. et al. Phylogenetic surveys on the newt genus Tylototriton sensu lato (Salamandridae, Caudata) reveal cryptic diversity and novel diversification promoted by historical climatic shifts. PeerJ 6, e4384 (2018).
pubmed: 29576937 pmcid: 5853667
Collyer, M. L. & Adams, D. C. RRPP: Linear model evaluation with randomized residuals in a permutation procedure. R package version 3.1.2 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RRPP (2019).
Collyer, M. L. & Adams, D. C. An R package for fitting linear models to high‐dimensional data using residual randomization. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 1772–1779 (2018).
Revell, L. J. Phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217–223 (2012).
Zelditch, M. L., Swiderski, D. L., Sheets, H. D. & Fink, W. L. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer (Elsevier/Academic Press, 2012).
Venditti, C., Meade, A. & Pagel, M. Multiple routes to mammalian diversity. Nature 479, 393–396 (2011).
pubmed: 22012260
Gelman, A. & Rubin, D. B. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat. Sci. 7, 457–472 (1992).
Yang, Z. Computational Molecular Evolution (Oxford Univ. Press, 2006).
Akaike, H. in Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory (eds Petrov, B. N. & Csaki, F.) 267–281 (Akademiai Kiado, 1973).
Goswami, A. & Finarelli, J. A. EMMLi: a maximum likelihood approach to the analysis of modularity. Evolution 70, 1622–1637 (2016).
pubmed: 27188434
Adams, D. C. Evaluating modularity in morphometric data: challenges with the RV coefficient and a new test measure. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 565–572 (2016).
Adams, D. C. & Felice, R. N. Assessing phylogenetic morphological integration and trait covariation in morphometric data using evolutionary covariance matrices. PLoS ONE 9, e9433 (2014).
Spearman, C. The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am. J. Psychol. 15, 72–101 (1904).
Pennell, M. W. et al. geiger v2.0: an expanded suite of methods for fitting macroevolutionary models to phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 30, 2216–2218 (2014).
pubmed: 24728855

Auteurs

Anne-Claire Fabre (AC)

Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London, UK. a.fabre@nhm.ac.uk.

Carla Bardua (C)

Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London, UK.
Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK.

Margot Bon (M)

Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London, UK.

Julien Clavel (J)

Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London, UK.
Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, ENTPE, UMR 5023 LEHNA, Villeurbanne, France.

Ryan N Felice (RN)

Centre for Integrative Anatomy, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, UK.

Jeffrey W Streicher (JW)

Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London, UK.

Jeanne Bonnel (J)

Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK.

Edward L Stanley (EL)

Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

David C Blackburn (DC)

Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Anjali Goswami (A)

Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London, UK.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice

Classifications MeSH