Effectiveness of suction valve button removal in retrieving resected colon polyps for better histological assessment: Propensity score matching analysis.
colonoscopy
cut-end margin
fragmentation
polyp retrieval
suction valve button
Journal
Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society
ISSN: 1443-1661
Titre abrégé: Dig Endosc
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9101419
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
02
04
2020
accepted:
16
06
2020
pubmed:
24
6
2020
medline:
29
7
2021
entrez:
24
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Fragmentation of endoscopically resected colorectal polyps during retrieval is one of the limitations for appropriate pathological diagnosis; however, little is known about steps to reduce it. We aimed to evaluate the effect of removing the suction valve button, which is one of the intricate parts of the endoscope, during polyp suction retrieval for fragmentation and pathological diagnosis. We retrospectively reviewed the polyps retrieved by suctioning. We used the propensity score matching method to adjust for difference between the button-attached and button-removed groups. Outcomes of fragmentation, pathological diagnosis of non-neoplastic polypectomy (NNP), and pathological cut-end among neoplastic lesions were evaluated. On the basis of propensity score matching, 322 pairs of cases were selected for analysis. After matching, the difference in the variables between the two groups was closely balanced. The fragmentation rate was significantly different between the groups (button-attached 36.6% vs. button-removed 22.4%, P < 0.001). No significant difference in the NNP rate was observed between the two groups (button-attached 8.4% vs. button-removed 9.9%). The rate of unclear cut-end was lower in the button-removed group than in the button-attached group (16.2% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.010). In the multivariate analysis, button removal was independently associated with reductions of fragmentation (odds ratio [OR] 0.508, P < 0.001) and unclear cut-end (OR 0.503, P = 0.009). Also, NNP was associated with smaller lesion size (OR 0.364, P < 0.001), but not with button removal. Suction valve button removal during polyp suction retrieval was an effective method to decrease the rates of fragmentation and histological unclear margins.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
OBJECTIVE
Fragmentation of endoscopically resected colorectal polyps during retrieval is one of the limitations for appropriate pathological diagnosis; however, little is known about steps to reduce it. We aimed to evaluate the effect of removing the suction valve button, which is one of the intricate parts of the endoscope, during polyp suction retrieval for fragmentation and pathological diagnosis.
METHODS
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed the polyps retrieved by suctioning. We used the propensity score matching method to adjust for difference between the button-attached and button-removed groups. Outcomes of fragmentation, pathological diagnosis of non-neoplastic polypectomy (NNP), and pathological cut-end among neoplastic lesions were evaluated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
On the basis of propensity score matching, 322 pairs of cases were selected for analysis. After matching, the difference in the variables between the two groups was closely balanced. The fragmentation rate was significantly different between the groups (button-attached 36.6% vs. button-removed 22.4%, P < 0.001). No significant difference in the NNP rate was observed between the two groups (button-attached 8.4% vs. button-removed 9.9%). The rate of unclear cut-end was lower in the button-removed group than in the button-attached group (16.2% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.010). In the multivariate analysis, button removal was independently associated with reductions of fragmentation (odds ratio [OR] 0.508, P < 0.001) and unclear cut-end (OR 0.503, P = 0.009). Also, NNP was associated with smaller lesion size (OR 0.364, P < 0.001), but not with button removal.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Suction valve button removal during polyp suction retrieval was an effective method to decrease the rates of fragmentation and histological unclear margins.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
433-440Informations de copyright
© 2020 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.
Références
Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1977-81.
Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 687-96.
Pohl H, Srivastava A, Bensen SP et al. Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy-results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 74-80.e1.
Anderloni A, Jovani M, Hassan C et al. Advances, problems, and complications of polypectomy. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2014; 7: 285-96.
Robertson DJ, Lieberman DA, Winawer SJ et al. Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: A pooled multicohort analysis. Gut 2014; 63: 949-56.
Tsai FC, Strum WB. Prevalence of advanced adenomas in small and diminutive colon polyps using direct measurement of size. Dig Dis Sci 2011; 56: 2384-8.
Repici A, Hassan C, Vitetta E et al. Safety of cold polypectomy for <10mm polyps at colonoscopy: A prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 27-31.
Atia MA, Patel NC, Ratuapli SK et al. Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: The impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 370-5.e1.
Shinozaki S, Kobayashi Y, Hayashi Y et al. Efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for resecting small colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Endosc 2018; 30: 592-9.
Ichihara S, Uraoka T, Oka S. Challenges associated with the pathological diagnosis of colorectal tumors less than 10 mm in size. Dig Endosc 2018; 30: 41-4.
Shimodate Y, Itakura J, Mizuno M et al. Factors associated with possibly inappropriate histological evaluation of excised specimens in cold-snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2018; 27: 25-30.
Barge W, Kumar D, Giusto D et al. Alternative approaches to polyp extraction in colonoscopy: A proof of principle study. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 88: 536-41.
Sano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo SE et al. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Dig Endosc 2016; 28: 526-33.
Kudo S, Tamura S, Nakajima T et al. Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 8-14.
Participants in the Paris Workshop. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: Esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: S3-43.
Abe Y, Nabeta H, Koyanagi R et al. Extended cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps increases the R0 resection rate. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E254-8.
Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 270-97.
Takeuchi Y, Yamashina T, Matsuura N et al. Feasibility of cold snare polypectomy in Japan: A pilot study. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7: 1250-6.
Hirose R, Yoshida N, Murakami T et al. Histopathological analysis of cold snare polypectomy and its indication for colorectal polyps 10-14 mm in diameter. Dig Endosc 2017; 29: 594-601.
Matsuura N, Takeuchi Y, Yamashina T et al. Incomplete resection rate of cold snare polypectomy: A prospective single-arm observational study. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 251-7.
Aoki T, Yoshida S, Abe H et al. Analysis of predictive factors for R0 resection and immediate bleeding of cold snare polypectomy in colonoscopy. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0213281.
Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. Endoscope capable of manipulation soon after autoclaving. Japanese Patent JP3414531. 2003. US Patent US5871441. 1999.
Olympus Medical Systems Co. Ltd. Endoscope button unit and endoscope. Japanese Patent JP4583915. 2010.