Temporal and spatial analysis of per and polyfluoroalkyl substances in surface waters of Houston ship channel following a large-scale industrial fire incident.
Journal
Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)
ISSN: 1873-6424
Titre abrégé: Environ Pollut
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8804476
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
25
03
2020
revised:
06
06
2020
accepted:
08
06
2020
pubmed:
24
6
2020
medline:
19
8
2020
entrez:
24
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Firefighting foams contain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) - a class of compounds widely used as surfactants. PFAS are persistent organic pollutants that have been reported in waterways and drinking water systems across the United States. These substances are of interest to both regulatory agencies and the general public because of their persistence in the environment and association with adverse health effects. PFAS can be released in large quantities during industrial incidents because they are present in most firefighting foams used to suppress chemical fires; however, little is known about persistence of PFAS in public waterways after such events. In response to large-scale fires at Intercontinental Terminal Company (ITC) in Houston, Texas in March 2019, almost 5 million liters of class B firefighting foams were used. Much of this material flowed into the Houston Ship Channel and Galveston Bay (HSC/GB) and concerns were raised about the levels of PFAS in these water bodies that have commercial and recreational uses. To evaluate the impact of the ITC incident response on PFAS levels in HSC/GB, we collected 52 surface water samples from 12 locations over a 6-month period after the incident. Samples were analyzed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to evaluate 27 PFAS, including perfluorocarboxylic acids, perfluorosulfonates and fluorotelomers. Among PFAS that were evaluated, 6:2 FTS and PFOS were detected at highest concentrations. Temporal and spatial profiles of PFAS were established; we found a major peak in the level of many PFAS in the days and weeks after the incident and a gradual decline over several months with patterns consistent with the tide- and wave-associated water movements. This work documents the impact of a large-scale industrial fire, on the environmental levels of PFAS, establishes a baseline concentration of PFAS in HSC/GB, and highlights the critical need for development of PFAS water quality standards.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32574947
pii: S0269-7491(20)32125-4
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115009
pmc: PMC7857671
mid: NIHMS1609351
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Drinking Water
0
Fluorocarbons
0
Water Pollutants, Chemical
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
115009Subventions
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : P30 ES029067
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : P42 ES027704
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : T32 ES026568
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Environ Health Perspect. 2013 Nov-Dec;121(11-12):A340
pubmed: 24284021
Heliyon. 2019 Aug 23;5(8):e02316
pubmed: 31485522
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Feb 21;51(4):2047-2057
pubmed: 28098989
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2017 Aug;36(8):2022-2029
pubmed: 28029183
Environ Health Perspect. 2019 Jan;127(1):14501
pubmed: 30632786
Environ Sci Technol. 2002 Feb 15;36(4):545-51
pubmed: 11883418
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Nov 20;52(22):13212-13221
pubmed: 30339382
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jan 10;647:690-698
pubmed: 30092525
Environ Int. 2019 Sep;130:104851
pubmed: 31284092
Int J Health Geogr. 2007 Nov 27;6:53
pubmed: 18042298
Environ Pollut. 2017 Dec;231(Pt 2):1223-1231
pubmed: 28928021
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Jul 17;52(14):7621-7629
pubmed: 29749740
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Jan 1;105(1):
pubmed: 31536623
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Jul 07;49(13):7666-74
pubmed: 26042823
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Nov 1;43(21):8283-9
pubmed: 19924957
Toxicol Lett. 2014 Dec 1;231(2):227-32
pubmed: 25447453
Environ Pollut. 2019 Mar;246:482-490
pubmed: 30583156
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jun 15;627:1334-1344
pubmed: 30857097
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Feb 7;51(3):1231-1240
pubmed: 28056502
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Aug 1;51(15):8313-8323
pubmed: 28669179
Talanta. 2019 Apr 1;195:533-542
pubmed: 30625579
Anal Chem. 2015 Apr 21;87(8):4260-8
pubmed: 25818392
Environ Health Perspect. 2018 Aug;126(8):84502
pubmed: 30235423
Anal Chem. 2020 Mar 17;92(6):4427-4435
pubmed: 32011866
Chemosphere. 2012 Oct;89(7):869-75
pubmed: 22658941
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2011 Oct;7(4):513-41
pubmed: 21793199
Chemosphere. 2011 Feb;82(6):853-8
pubmed: 21112609
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2019 Nov 1;21(11):1926-1935
pubmed: 31183483
Environ Res. 2019 Apr;171:266-277
pubmed: 30703622
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 25;653:359-369
pubmed: 30412881
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Jul 3;46(13):7120-7
pubmed: 22681548
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jul 1;628-629:110-120
pubmed: 29428853
Environ Pollut. 2010 Oct;158(10):3243-50
pubmed: 20692748
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 May 29;12(6):6098-114
pubmed: 26035660
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Oct 1;45(19):8081-9
pubmed: 21774496
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Oct 15;639:263-270
pubmed: 29787910
J Chromatogr A. 2018 May 25;1551:52-58
pubmed: 29628221
Chemosphere. 2015 Jun;129:33-8
pubmed: 24821232
Environ Int. 2020 Jan;134:105244
pubmed: 31711019
Anal Chim Acta. 2013 Aug 6;790:1-13
pubmed: 23870403
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jun 10;720:137263
pubmed: 32145609
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;29(2):131-147
pubmed: 30470793
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Nov 5;53(21):12576-12585
pubmed: 31578061
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Nov 15;499:185-95
pubmed: 25190044