Contribution of major food companies and their products to household dietary sodium purchases in Australia.

Australia Beverages Dietary Disparities Income Packaged food Sodium Sodium intake

Journal

The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity
ISSN: 1479-5868
Titre abrégé: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101217089

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 06 2020
Historique:
received: 13 12 2019
accepted: 08 06 2020
entrez: 25 6 2020
pubmed: 25 6 2020
medline: 20 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The Australian federal government will soon release voluntary sodium reduction targets for 30 packaged food categories through the Healthy Food Partnership. Previous assessments of voluntary targets show variable industry engagement, and little is known about the extent that major food companies and their products contribute to dietary sodium purchases among Australian households. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to identify the relative contribution that food companies and their products made to Australian household sodium purchases in 2018, and to examine differences in sodium purchases by household income level. We used 1 year of grocery purchase data from a nationally representative consumer panel of Australian households who reported their grocery purchases (the Nielsen Homescan panel), combined with database that contains product-specific sodium content for packaged foods and beverages (FoodSwitch). The top food companies and food categories were ranked according to their contribution to household sodium purchases. Differences in per capita sodium purchases by income levels were assessed by 1-factor ANOVA. All analyses were modelled to the Australian population in 2018 using sample weights. Sodium data were available from 7188 households who purchased 26,728 unique products and purchased just under 7.5 million food product units. Out of 1329 food companies, the top 10 accounted for 35% of unique products and contributed to 58% of all sodium purchased from packaged foods and beverages. The top three companies were grocery food retailers each contributing 12-15% of sodium purchases from sales of their private label products, particularly processed meat, cheese and bread. Out of the 67 food categories, the top 10 accounted for 73% of sodium purchased, particularly driven by purchases of processed meat (14%), bread (12%) and sauces (11%). Low-income Australian households purchased significantly more sodium from packaged products than high-income households per capita (452 mg/d, 95%CI: 363-540 mg/d, P < 0.001). A small number of food companies and food categories account for most of the dietary sodium purchased by Australian households. Prioritizing government engagement with these groups could deliver a large reduction in population sodium intake.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The Australian federal government will soon release voluntary sodium reduction targets for 30 packaged food categories through the Healthy Food Partnership. Previous assessments of voluntary targets show variable industry engagement, and little is known about the extent that major food companies and their products contribute to dietary sodium purchases among Australian households.
METHODS
The aim of this cross-sectional study was to identify the relative contribution that food companies and their products made to Australian household sodium purchases in 2018, and to examine differences in sodium purchases by household income level. We used 1 year of grocery purchase data from a nationally representative consumer panel of Australian households who reported their grocery purchases (the Nielsen Homescan panel), combined with database that contains product-specific sodium content for packaged foods and beverages (FoodSwitch). The top food companies and food categories were ranked according to their contribution to household sodium purchases. Differences in per capita sodium purchases by income levels were assessed by 1-factor ANOVA. All analyses were modelled to the Australian population in 2018 using sample weights.
RESULTS
Sodium data were available from 7188 households who purchased 26,728 unique products and purchased just under 7.5 million food product units. Out of 1329 food companies, the top 10 accounted for 35% of unique products and contributed to 58% of all sodium purchased from packaged foods and beverages. The top three companies were grocery food retailers each contributing 12-15% of sodium purchases from sales of their private label products, particularly processed meat, cheese and bread. Out of the 67 food categories, the top 10 accounted for 73% of sodium purchased, particularly driven by purchases of processed meat (14%), bread (12%) and sauces (11%). Low-income Australian households purchased significantly more sodium from packaged products than high-income households per capita (452 mg/d, 95%CI: 363-540 mg/d, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
A small number of food companies and food categories account for most of the dietary sodium purchased by Australian households. Prioritizing government engagement with these groups could deliver a large reduction in population sodium intake.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32576211
doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00982-z
pii: 10.1186/s12966-020-00982-z
pmc: PMC7310483
doi:

Substances chimiques

Sodium, Dietary 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

81

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Références

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Aug 21;2(3):e37
pubmed: 25147135
Hypertension. 2018 May;71(5):858-865
pubmed: 29555665
Nutrients. 2014 Aug 21;6(8):3274-87
pubmed: 25195640
Med J Aust. 2018 Feb 5;208(2):75-81
pubmed: 29385968
Nutrients. 2014 Sep 19;6(9):3802-17
pubmed: 25244369
Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Mar;93(3):594-600
pubmed: 21191142
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003 Apr;57(4):616-20
pubmed: 12700625
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 22;10(7):e0130247
pubmed: 26201031
J Am Diet Assoc. 1999 Aug;99(8 Suppl):S96-104
pubmed: 10450301
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jul 1;177(7):986-994
pubmed: 28586820
Lancet. 2019 May 11;393(10184):1958-1972
pubmed: 30954305
BMJ Open. 2013 Feb 08;3(2):
pubmed: 23396559
Am J Hypertens. 2014 Oct;27(10):1277-84
pubmed: 24510182
Nutrients. 2015 Aug 21;7(8):7027-41
pubmed: 26308047
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Feb;44(2):174-84
pubmed: 23332336
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jun;46(6):633-42
pubmed: 24842740
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 27;16:651
pubmed: 27465746
Am J Public Health. 2017 Apr;107(4):e1-e12
pubmed: 28207328
BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 16;4(1):e003720
pubmed: 24440795
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 17;65(10):1042-50
pubmed: 25766952
Nutrients. 2017 Jun 17;9(6):
pubmed: 28629146

Auteurs

Daisy H Coyle (DH)

The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Level 5, 1 King St Newtown, Sydney, Australia. dcoyle@georgeinstitute.org.au.

Maria Shahid (M)

The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Level 5, 1 King St Newtown, Sydney, Australia.

Elizabeth K Dunford (EK)

The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Level 5, 1 King St Newtown, Sydney, Australia.
Department of Nutrition, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.

Cliona Ni Mhurchu (CN)

The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Level 5, 1 King St Newtown, Sydney, Australia.
National Institute for Health Innovation, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Sarah Mckee (S)

Nielsen, Sydney, Australia.

Myla Santos (M)

Nielsen, Sydney, Australia.

Barry M Popkin (BM)

Department of Nutrition, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.

Kathy Trieu (K)

The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Level 5, 1 King St Newtown, Sydney, Australia.

Matti Marklund (M)

The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Level 5, 1 King St Newtown, Sydney, Australia.
Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.

Fraser Taylor (F)

The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Level 5, 1 King St Newtown, Sydney, Australia.

Bruce Neal (B)

The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Level 5, 1 King St Newtown, Sydney, Australia.

Jason H Y Wu (JHY)

The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Level 5, 1 King St Newtown, Sydney, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH