The Curing Coma Campaign: Framing Initial Scientific Challenges-Proceedings of the First Curing Coma Campaign Scientific Advisory Council Meeting.
Biomarker
Coma
Consciousness
Endotype
Recovery
Journal
Neurocritical care
ISSN: 1556-0961
Titre abrégé: Neurocrit Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101156086
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
25
6
2020
medline:
17
8
2021
entrez:
25
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Coma and disordered consciousness are common manifestations of acute neurological conditions and are among the most pervasive and challenging aspects of treatment in neurocritical care. Gaps exist in patient assessment, outcome prognostication, and treatment directed specifically at improving consciousness and cognitive recovery. In 2019, the Neurocritical Care Society (NCS) launched the Curing Coma Campaign in order to address the "grand challenge" of improving the management of patients with coma and decreased consciousness. One of the first steps was to bring together a Scientific Advisory Council including coma scientists, neurointensivists, neurorehabilitationists, and implementation experts in order to address the current scientific landscape and begin to develop a framework on how to move forward. This manuscript describes the proceedings of the first Curing Coma Campaign Scientific Advisory Council meeting which occurred in conjunction with the NCS Annual Meeting in October 2019 in Vancouver. Specifically, three major pillars were identified which should be considered: endotyping of coma and disorders of consciousness, biomarkers, and proof-of-concept clinical trials. Each is summarized with regard to current approach, benefits to the patient, family, and clinicians, and next steps. Integration of these three pillars will be essential to the success of the Curing Coma Campaign as will expanding the "curing coma community" to ensure broad participation of clinicians, scientists, and patient advocates with the goal of identifying and implementing treatments to fundamentally improve the outcome of patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32578124
doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01028-9
pii: 10.1007/s12028-020-01028-9
pmc: PMC7392933
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Types de publication
Congress
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1-12Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : K23 NS105950
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : KL2 TR001416
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Brogan ME, Provencio JJ. Spectrum of catastrophic brain injury: coma and related disorders of consciousness. J Crit Care. 2014;29(4):679–82.
pubmed: 24930368
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.04.014
Giacino JT, Malone R. The vegetative and minimally conscious states. Handb Clin Neurol. 2008;90:99–111.
pubmed: 18631819
doi: 10.1016/S0072-9752(07)01706-X
Giacino JT, Fins JJ, Laureys S, Schiff ND. Disorders of consciousness after acquired brain injury: the state of the science. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(2):99–114.
pubmed: 24468878
doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.279
Rubin M, Bonomo J, Hemphill JC 3rd. Intersection of prognosis and palliation in neurocritical care. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017;23(2):134–9.
pubmed: 28169857
doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000396
Turgeon AF, Lauzier F, Simard JF, et al. Mortality associated with withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a Canadian multicentre cohort study. CMAJ. 2011;183(14):1581–8.
pubmed: 21876014
pmcid: 3185074
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101786
Izzy S, Compton R, Carandang R, Hall W, Muehlschlegel S. Self-fulfilling prophecies through withdrawal of care: do they exist in traumatic brain injury, too? Neurocrit Care. 2013;19(3):347–63.
pubmed: 24132565
doi: 10.1007/s12028-013-9925-z
Hocker S, Shah S, Vespa P, et al. The future of neurocritical care research: proceedings and recommendations from the fifth neurocritical care research network conference. Neurocrit Care. 2020;32(1):311–6.
pubmed: 31264070
doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00767-8
Lutkenhoff ES, Chiang J, Tshibanda L, et al. Thalamic and extrathalamic mechanisms of consciousness after severe brain injury. Ann Neurol. 2015;78(1):68–76.
pubmed: 25893530
doi: 10.1002/ana.24423
Adams JH, Graham DI, Jennett B. The neuropathology of the vegetative state after an acute brain insult. Brain. 2000;123(Pt 7):1327–38.
pubmed: 10869046
doi: 10.1093/brain/123.7.1327
Schiff ND. Central thalamic contributions to arousal regulation and neurological disorders of consciousness. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2008;1129:105–18.
pubmed: 18591473
doi: 10.1196/annals.1417.029
Sharp DJ, Scott G, Leech R. Network dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(3):156–66.
pubmed: 24514870
doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.15
Kim YW, Shin JC, An YS. Effects of methylphenidate on cerebral glucose metabolism in patients with impaired consciousness after acquired brain injury. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2009;32(6):335–9.
pubmed: 19667974
doi: 10.1097/WNF.0b013e3181b40678
Schiff ND, Giacino JT, Kalmar K, et al. Behavioural improvements with thalamic stimulation after severe traumatic brain injury. Nature. 2007;448(7153):600–3.
pubmed: 17671503
doi: 10.1038/nature06041
Smith DH, Hicks R, Povlishock JT. Therapy development for diffuse axonal injury. J Neurotrauma. 2013;30(5):307–23.
pubmed: 23252624
pmcid: 3627407
doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2825
Thibaut A, Bruno MA, Ledoux D, Demertzi A, Laureys S. tDCS in patients with disorders of consciousness: sham-controlled randomized double-blind study. Neurology. 2014;82(13):1112–8.
pubmed: 24574549
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000260
Venkatasubba Rao CP, Suarez JI, Martin RH, et al. Global survey of outcomes of neurocritical care patients: analysis of the PRINCE study part 2. Neurocrit Care. 2020;32(1):88–103.
pubmed: 31486027
doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00835-z
Suarez JI, Martin RH, Bauza C, et al. Worldwide organization of neurocritical care: results from the PRINCE study part 1. Neurocrit Care. 2020;32(1):172–9.
pubmed: 31175567
doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00750-3
Laureys S, Celesia GG, Cohadon F, et al. Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Med. 2010;8:68.
pubmed: 21040571
pmcid: 2987895
doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-68
Kondziella D, Bender A, Diserens K, et al. European Academy of Neurology guideline on the diagnosis of coma and other disorders of consciousness. Eur J Neurol. 2020;27(5):741–56.
Giacino JT, Katz DI, Schiff ND, et al. Practice guideline update recommendations summary: disorders of consciousness: report of the guideline development, dissemination, and implementation subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research. Neurology. 2018;91(10):450–60.
pubmed: 30089618
pmcid: 6139814
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005926
Giacino JT, Kalmar K. The vegetative and minimally conscious states: a comparison of clinical features and functional outcome. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1997;12(4):36–51.
doi: 10.1097/00001199-199708000-00005
Forgacs PB, Devinsky O, Schiff ND. Independent functional outcomes after prolonged coma following cardiac arrest: a mechanistic hypothesis. Ann Neurol. 2020;87(4):618–32.
pubmed: 31994749
pmcid: 7393600
doi: 10.1002/ana.25690
Barra, M.E., Izzy, S., Sarro-Schwartz, A., et al. Stimulant therapy in acute traumatic brain injury: prescribing patterns and adverse event rates at 2 level 1 trauma centers. J Intensive Care Med 2019:885066619841603.
Giacino JT, Katz DI, Schiff ND, et al. Comprehensive systematic review update summary: disorders of consciousness: report of the guideline development, dissemination, and implementation subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research. Neurology. 2018;91(10):461–70.
pubmed: 30089617
pmcid: 6139817
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005928
Edlow BL, Chatelle C, Spencer CA, et al. Early detection of consciousness in patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury. Brain. 2017;140(9):2399–414.
pubmed: 29050383
pmcid: 6059097
doi: 10.1093/brain/awx176
Struck AF, Westover MB, Hall LT, et al. Metabolic correlates of the ictal-interictal continuum: FDG-PET during continuous EEG. Neurocrit Care. 2016;24(3):324–31.
pubmed: 27169855
pmcid: 5478419
doi: 10.1007/s12028-016-0245-y
Casali AG, Gosseries O, Rosanova M, et al. A theoretically based index of consciousness independent of sensory processing and behavior. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(198):198ra05.
doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006294
Claassen J, Doyle K, Matory A, et al. Detection of brain activation in unresponsive patients with acute brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(26):2497–505.
pubmed: 31242361
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812757
Engemann DA, Raimondo F, King JR, et al. Robust EEG-based cross-site and cross-protocol classification of states of consciousness. Brain. 2018;141(11):3179–92.
pubmed: 30285102
doi: 10.1093/brain/awy251
Demertzi A, Tagliazucchi E, Dehaene S, et al. Human consciousness is supported by dynamic complex patterns of brain signal coordination. Sci Adv. 2019;5(2):eaat7603.
pubmed: 30775433
pmcid: 6365115
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat7603
Norton L, Hutchison RM, Young GB, et al. Disruptions of functional connectivity in the default mode network of comatose patients. Neurology. 2012;78(3):175–81.
pubmed: 22218274
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823fcd61
Vanhaudenhuyse A, Noirhomme Q, Tshibanda LJ, et al. Default network connectivity reflects the level of consciousness in non-communicative brain-damaged patients. Brain. 2010;133(Pt 1):161–71.
pubmed: 20034928
doi: 10.1093/brain/awp313
Hammond FM, Giacino JT, Nakase Richardson R, et al. Disorders of consciousness due to traumatic brain injury: functional status ten years post-injury. J Neurotrauma. 2019;36(7):1136–46.
pubmed: 30226400
doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.5954
McFadyen CA, Zeiler FA, Newcombe V et al. Apolipoprotein E4 Polymorphism and outcomes from traumatic brain injury: a living systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurotrauma. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2018.6052 .
Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK coma recovery scale-revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(12):2020–9.
pubmed: 15605342
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.033
Schiff ND. Cognitive motor dissociation following severe brain injuries. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(12):1413–5.
pubmed: 26502348
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.2899
Forgacs PB, Frey HP, Velazquez A, et al. Dynamic regimes of neocortical activity linked to corticothalamic integrity correlate with outcomes in acute anoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2017;4(2):119–29.
pubmed: 28168211
pmcid: 5288467
doi: 10.1002/acn3.385
Sitt JD, King JR, El Karoui I, et al. Large scale screening of neural signatures of consciousness in patients in a vegetative or minimally conscious state. Brain. 2014;137(Pt 8):2258–70.
pubmed: 24919971
pmcid: 4610185
doi: 10.1093/brain/awu141
Claassen J, Velazquez A, Meyers E, et al. Bedside quantitative electroencephalography improves assessment of consciousness in comatose subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. Ann Neurol. 2016;80(4):541–53.
pubmed: 27472071
pmcid: 5042849
doi: 10.1002/ana.24752
Velly L, Perlbarg V, Boulier T, et al. Use of brain diffusion tensor imaging for the prediction of long-term neurological outcomes in patients after cardiac arrest: a multicentre, international, prospective, observational, cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(4):317–26.
pubmed: 29500154
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30027-9
Kondziella D, Fisher PM, Larsen VA, et al. Functional MRI for assessment of the default mode network in acute brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2017;27(3):401–6.
pubmed: 28484929
doi: 10.1007/s12028-017-0407-6
Galanaud D, Perlbarg V, Gupta R, et al. Assessment of white matter injury and outcome in severe brain trauma: a prospective multicenter cohort. Anesthesiology. 2012;117(6):1300–10.
pubmed: 23135261
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182755558
Power JD, Mitra A, Laumann TO, et al. Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI. Neuroimage. 2014;84:320–41.
pubmed: 23994314
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.048
Dell’Italia J, Johnson MA, Vespa PM, Monti MM. Network analysis in disorders of consciousness: four problems and one proposed solution (exponential random graph models). Front Neurol. 2018;9:439.
pubmed: 29946293
pmcid: 6005847
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00439
Peberdy MA, Kaye W, Ornato JP, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of adults in the hospital: a report of 14720 cardiac arrests from the national registry of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2003;58(3):297–308.
pubmed: 12969608
doi: 10.1016/S0300-9572(03)00215-6
Thibaut A, Schiff N, Giacino J, Laureys S, Gosseries O. Therapeutic interventions in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(6):600–14.
pubmed: 31003899
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30031-6
Giacino JT, Whyte J, Bagiella E, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of amantadine for severe traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):819–26.
pubmed: 22375973
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102609
Haig AJ, Ruess JM. Recovery from vegetative state of six months’ duration associated with Sinemet (levodopa/carbidopa). Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71(13):1081–3.
pubmed: 2256811
Krimchansky BZ, Keren O, Sazbon L, Groswasser Z. Differential time and related appearance of signs, indicating improvement in the state of consciousness in vegetative state traumatic brain injury (VS-TBI) patients after initiation of dopamine treatment. Brain Inj. 2004;18(11):1099–105.
pubmed: 15545207
doi: 10.1080/02699050310001646206
Passler MA, Riggs RV. Positive outcomes in traumatic brain injury-vegetative state: patients treated with bromocriptine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(3):311–5.
pubmed: 11245751
doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.20831
Fridman EA, Krimchansky BZ, Bonetto M, et al. Continuous subcutaneous apomorphine for severe disorders of consciousness after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2010;24(4):636–41.
pubmed: 20235766
doi: 10.3109/02699051003610433
Whyte J, Myers R. Incidence of clinically significant responses to zolpidem among patients with disorders of consciousness: a preliminary placebo controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;88(5):410–8.
pubmed: 19620954
doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181a0e3a0
Schiff ND. Recovery of consciousness after brain injury: a mesocircuit hypothesis. Trends Neurosci. 2010;33(1):1–9.
pubmed: 19954851
doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2009.11.002
Manganotti P, Formaggio E, Storti SF, et al. Effect of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on brain excitability in severely brain-injured patients in minimally conscious or vegetative state. Brain Stimul. 2013;6(6):913–21.
pubmed: 23928101
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.06.006
Monti MM, Schnakers C, Korb AS, Bystritsky A, Vespa PM. Non-invasive ultrasonic thalamic stimulation in disorders of consciousness after severe brain injury: a first-in-man report. Brain Stimul. 2016;9(6):940–1.
pubmed: 27567470
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.07.008
Corazzol M, Lio G, Lefevre A, et al. Restoring consciousness with vagus nerve stimulation. Curr Biol. 2017;27(18):R994–6.
pubmed: 28950091
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.07.060
Leitinger M, Trinka E, Gardella E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the Salzburg EEG criteria for non-convulsive status epilepticus: a retrospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(10):1054–62.
pubmed: 27571157
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30137-5
Teasdale G, Maas A, Lecky F, et al. The Glasgow coma scale at 40 years: standing the test of time. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(8):844–54.
pubmed: 25030516
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70120-6
Wijdicks EF, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV, Manno EM, McClelland RL. Validation of a new coma scale: the FOUR score. Ann Neurol. 2005;58(4):585–93.
pubmed: 16178024
doi: 10.1002/ana.20611
Edlow BL, Haynes RL, Takahashi E, et al. Disconnection of the ascending arousal system in traumatic coma. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2013;72(6):505–23.
pubmed: 23656993
doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3182945bf6
Threlkeld ZD, Bodien YG, Rosenthal ES, et al. Functional networks reemerge during recovery of consciousness after acute severe traumatic brain injury. Cortex. 2018;106:299–308.
pubmed: 29871771
pmcid: 6120794
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.05.004
Maas AIR, Menon DK, Adelson PD, et al. Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(12):987–1048.
pubmed: 29122524
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30371-X
Diaz-Arrastia R, Kochanek PM, Bergold P, et al. Pharmacotherapy of traumatic brain injury: state of the science and the road forward: report of the department of defense neurotrauma pharmacology workgroup. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(2):135–58.
pubmed: 23968241
pmcid: 3900003
doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3019
Snider SB, Bodien YG, Bianciardi M, et al. Disruption of the ascending arousal network in acute traumatic disorders of consciousness. Neurology. 2019;93(13):e1281–7.
pubmed: 31484715
pmcid: 7011864
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008163
Yue JK, Yuh EL, Korley FK, et al. Association between plasma GFAP concentrations and MRI abnormalities in patients with CT-negative traumatic brain injury in the TRACK-TBI cohort: a prospective multicentre study. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(10):953–61.
pubmed: 31451409
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30282-0
Schmidt E, Kalil T. Creating a moonshot culture. Barron’s PENTA. December 9 2019 (published online).
Wadman M. Behind the scenes of a brain-mapping moon shot. Nature. 2013;495(7439):19.
pubmed: 23467146
doi: 10.1038/495019a
Grinnon ST, Miller K, Marler JR, et al. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Common Data Element Project—approach and methods. Clin Trials. 2012;9(3):322–9.
pubmed: 22371630
pmcid: 3513359
doi: 10.1177/1740774512438980
Edelman DB, Seth AK. Animal consciousness: a synthetic approach. Trends Neurosci. 2009;32(9):476–84.
pubmed: 19716185
doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2009.05.008