Plants' ability to sense and respond to airborne sound is likely to be adaptive: reply to comment by Pyke et al.
Communication
moth behaviour
nectar
plant bioacoustics
plant-pollinator interactions
pollination
signalling
sugar concentration
vibration
Journal
Ecology letters
ISSN: 1461-0248
Titre abrégé: Ecol Lett
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101121949
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
11
11
2019
revised:
17
12
2019
accepted:
17
02
2020
pubmed:
25
6
2020
medline:
13
8
2020
entrez:
25
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ecol. Lett. 22, 2019, 1483 demonstrated, for the first time, a rapid response of a plant to the airborne sounds of pollinators. Pyke et al. argue that this response is unlikely to be adaptive. Here we clarify some misunderstandings, and demonstrate the potential adaptive value using theoretical modelling and field observations.
Substances chimiques
Plant Nectar
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1423-1425Subventions
Organisme : ISF
ID : 2064/18 (LH)
Organisme : Bikura
ID : 2658/18
Informations de copyright
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.
Références
Boose, D.L. (1997). Sources of variation in floral nectar production rate in Epilobium canum (Onagraceae): implications for natural selection. Oecologia, 110, 493-500.
Chittka, L., Gumbert, A. & Kunze, J. (1997). Foraging dynamics of bumble bees: correlates of movements within and between plant species. Behav. Ecol., 8, 239-249.
Cnaani, J., Thomson, J.D. & Papaj, D.R. (2006). Flower choice and learning in foraging bumblebees: effects of variation in nectar volume and concentration. Ethology, 112, 278-285.
Herrera, C.M., Pérez, R. & Alonso, C. (2006). Extreme intraplant variation in nectar sugar composition in an insect-pollinated perennial herb. Am. J. Bot., 93, 575-581.
Josens, R.B. & Farina, W.M. (2001). Nectar feeding by the hovering hawk moth Macroglossum stellatarum: intake rate as a function of viscosity and concentration of sucrose solutions. J. Comp. Physiol. A., 187, 661-665.
Keasar, T., Shmida, A. & Motro, U. (1996). Innate movement rules in foraging bees: flight distances are affected by recent rewards and are correlated with choice of flower type. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 39, 381-388.
Keasar, T., Sadeh, A. & Shmida, A. (2008). Variability in nectar production and standing crop, and their relation to pollinator visits in a Mediterranean shrub. Arthropod-Plant Interactions, 2, 117-123.
Knauer, A.C. & Schiestl, F.P. (2015). Bees use honest floral signals as indicators of reward when visiting flowers. Ecol. Lett., 18, 135-143.
Lapshin, D. & Vorontsov, D. (2007). Acoustic irradiation produced by flying moths (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). Entomol. Rev., 87, 1115.
Manetas, Y. & Petropoulou, Y. (2000). Nectar Amount, Pollinator Visit Duration and Pollination Success in the Mediterranean Shrub Cistus creticus. Ann. Bot., 86, 815-820.
Pacini, E., Nepi, M. & Vesprini, J. (2003). Nectar biodiversity: a short review. Plant Syst. Evol., 238, 7-21.
Richter, M.R. & Waddington, K.D. (1993). Past foraging experience influences honey bee dance behaviour. Anim. Behav., 46, 123-128.
Scheiner, R., Page, R.E. & Erber, J. (2004). Sucrose responsiveness and behavioral plasticity in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Apidologie, 35, 133-142.
Schöner, M.G., Simon, R. & Schöner, C.R. (2016). Acoustic communication in plant-animal interactions. Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol., 32, 88-95.
Thompson, J.D. (2001). How do visitation patterns vary among pollinators in relation to floral display and floral design in a generalist pollination system? Oecologia, 126, 386-394.
Veits, M., Khait, I., Obolski, U., Zinger, E., Boonman, A., Goldshtein, A. et al. (2019). Flowers respond to pollinator sound within minutes by increasing nectar sugar concentration. Ecol. Lett., 22, 1483-1492.
Waddington, K.D. (1980). Flight patterns of foraging bees relative to density of artificial flowers and distribution of nectar. Oecologia, 44, 199-204.
Wang, S., Fu, W.L., Du, W., Zhang, Q., Li, Y., Lyu, Y.S. & et al. (2018). Nectary tracks as pollinator manipulators: The pollination ecology of Swertia bimaculata (Gentianaceae). Ecol. Evol., 8, 3187-3207.