Evaluating the Incidence of Opioid-Induced Respiratory Depression Associated with Oliceridine and Morphine as Measured by the Frequency and Average Cumulative Duration of Dosing Interruption in Patients Treated for Acute Postoperative Pain.


Journal

Clinical drug investigation
ISSN: 1179-1918
Titre abrégé: Clin Drug Investig
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 9504817

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 26 6 2020
medline: 21 10 2020
entrez: 26 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD) is a potentially fatal complication associated with conventional opioids. Currently, there is a paucity of validated endpoints available to measure respiratory safety. Oliceridine, an investigational intravenous (IV) opioid, is a G-protein selective μ-agonist with limited activity on β-arrestin2, a signaling pathway associated with adverse events including OIRD. In controlled phase III trials, oliceridine 0.35 mg and 0.5 mg demand doses demonstrated comparable analgesia to morphine 1 mg with favorable improvements in respiratory safety. In this exploratory analysis, we report dosing interruption (DI) and average cumulative duration of DI (CDDI) for both oliceridine and morphine. Patients requiring analgesia after bunionectomy or abdominoplasty were randomized to IV demand doses of placebo, oliceridine (0.1 mg, 0.35 mg, or 0.5 mg), or morphine (1 mg), administered via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), following a loading dose (oliceridine 1.5 mg, morphine 4 mg, volume-matched placebo) with a 6-min lockout interval. Certified nurse anesthetists monitored each patient and withheld study medication according to the patient's respiratory status. For each patient, the duration of all DIs was summed and reported as CDDI. A zero-inflated gamma mixture model was used to compute the mean CDDI for each treatment. Proportion of patients with DI was lower with oliceridine (0.1 mg: 3.2%, 0.35 mg: 13.9%, 0.5 mg: 15.1%) versus morphine (22%). The CDDI was also lower across all demand doses of oliceridine versus morphine. Using DI as a surrogate for OIRD indicates improved respiratory safety with oliceridine versus morphine that merits further investigation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
Opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD) is a potentially fatal complication associated with conventional opioids. Currently, there is a paucity of validated endpoints available to measure respiratory safety. Oliceridine, an investigational intravenous (IV) opioid, is a G-protein selective μ-agonist with limited activity on β-arrestin2, a signaling pathway associated with adverse events including OIRD. In controlled phase III trials, oliceridine 0.35 mg and 0.5 mg demand doses demonstrated comparable analgesia to morphine 1 mg with favorable improvements in respiratory safety. In this exploratory analysis, we report dosing interruption (DI) and average cumulative duration of DI (CDDI) for both oliceridine and morphine.
METHODS METHODS
Patients requiring analgesia after bunionectomy or abdominoplasty were randomized to IV demand doses of placebo, oliceridine (0.1 mg, 0.35 mg, or 0.5 mg), or morphine (1 mg), administered via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), following a loading dose (oliceridine 1.5 mg, morphine 4 mg, volume-matched placebo) with a 6-min lockout interval. Certified nurse anesthetists monitored each patient and withheld study medication according to the patient's respiratory status. For each patient, the duration of all DIs was summed and reported as CDDI. A zero-inflated gamma mixture model was used to compute the mean CDDI for each treatment.
RESULTS RESULTS
Proportion of patients with DI was lower with oliceridine (0.1 mg: 3.2%, 0.35 mg: 13.9%, 0.5 mg: 15.1%) versus morphine (22%). The CDDI was also lower across all demand doses of oliceridine versus morphine.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Using DI as a surrogate for OIRD indicates improved respiratory safety with oliceridine versus morphine that merits further investigation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32583295
doi: 10.1007/s40261-020-00936-0
pii: 10.1007/s40261-020-00936-0
pmc: PMC7359152
doi:

Substances chimiques

((3-methoxythiophen-2-yl)methyl)((2-(9-(pyridin-2-yl)-6-oxaspiro(4.5)decan-9-yl)ethyl))amine 0
Analgesics, Opioid 0
Spiro Compounds 0
Thiophenes 0
Morphine 76I7G6D29C

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

755-764

Références

J Crit Care. 2018 Oct;47:80-87
pubmed: 29936327
Cell. 2017 Nov 16;171(5):1165-1175.e13
pubmed: 29149605
Anesth Analg. 2016 Dec;123(6):1356-1358
pubmed: 27861444
Anesthesiology. 2015 Mar;122(3):659-65
pubmed: 25536092
Pain Pract. 2019 Sep;19(7):715-731
pubmed: 31162798
Anesth Analg. 2020 Oct;131(4):1012-1024
pubmed: 32925318
Br J Anaesth. 2004 Aug;93(2):212-23
pubmed: 15169738
Pain Ther. 2018 Dec;7(2):205-216
pubmed: 30367388
Pain. 2014 Sep;155(9):1829-35
pubmed: 24954166
JAMA Surg. 2018 Aug 1;153(8):757-763
pubmed: 29799927
Pharmacol Rev. 2011 Dec;63(4):1001-19
pubmed: 21873412
Anesth Analg. 2015 Sep;121(3):709-15
pubmed: 26287299
J Pain Res. 2019 Mar 11;12:927-943
pubmed: 30881102
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 May;29(5 Suppl):S10-24
pubmed: 15907643
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 14;8(12):e024086
pubmed: 30552274
Patient Saf Surg. 2011 Feb 11;5(1):3
pubmed: 21314935
J Med Chem. 2013 Oct 24;56(20):8019-31
pubmed: 24063433
Anesthesiology. 2010 Jan;112(1):226-38
pubmed: 20010421
J Pain Res. 2017 Oct 06;10:2413-2424
pubmed: 29062240
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2013 Mar;344(3):708-17
pubmed: 23300227
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018 Feb;31(1):110-119
pubmed: 29120929
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Sep;123(3):378-391
pubmed: 31331649

Auteurs

Sabry Ayad (S)

Department of Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Fairview Hospital, 18101 Lorain Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44111, USA. Saayad@ccf.org.
Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. Saayad@ccf.org.

Mark A Demitrack (MA)

Clinical Operations and Medical Affairs, Trevena Inc., Chesterbrook, PA, USA.

David A Burt (DA)

Clinical Development and Quantitative Sciences, Trevena Inc., Chesterbrook, PA, 19087, USA.

Cathy Michalsky (C)

Clinical Development and Quantitative Sciences, Trevena Inc., Chesterbrook, PA, 19087, USA.

Linda Wase (L)

Clinical Operations and Medical Affairs, Trevena Inc., Chesterbrook, PA, USA.

Michael J Fossler (MJ)

Clinical Development and Quantitative Sciences, Trevena Inc., Chesterbrook, PA, 19087, USA.

Ashish K Khanna (AK)

Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH