Inequalities and identity processes in crises: Recommendations for facilitating safe response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Betacoronavirus
COVID-19
Communicable Disease Control
Coronavirus Infections
/ prevention & control
Disaster Planning
Health Promotion
/ methods
Health Status Disparities
Healthcare Disparities
Humans
Leadership
Pandemics
/ prevention & control
Personal Protective Equipment
Pneumonia, Viral
/ prevention & control
Risk Reduction Behavior
SARS-CoV-2
Self-Help Groups
Social Norms
Socioeconomic Factors
Trust
COVID-19
Identity processes
behaviour change
collective actions
coronavirus
inequality
leadership
social identities
social norms
societal inequality
Journal
The British journal of social psychology
ISSN: 2044-8309
Titre abrégé: Br J Soc Psychol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8105534
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
23
04
2020
revised:
07
06
2020
pubmed:
26
6
2020
medline:
18
7
2020
entrez:
26
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Structural inequalities and identity processes are pivotal to understanding public response to COVID-19. We discuss how identity processes can be used to promote community-level support, safe normative behaviour, and increase compliance with guidance. However, we caution how government failure to account for structural inequalities can alienate vulnerable groups, inhibit groups from being able to follow guidance, and lead to the creation of new groups in response to illegitimate treatment. Moreover, we look ahead to the longitudinal impacts of inequalities during pandemics and advise government bodies should address identity-based inequalities to mitigate negative relations with the public and subsequent collective protest.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32583423
doi: 10.1111/bjso.12400
pmc: PMC7383992
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
674-685Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Social Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.
Références
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jun 02;14(6):
pubmed: 28574480
PLoS Curr. 2016 Jan 26;8:
pubmed: 26865987
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 17;69(15):458-464
pubmed: 32298251
Front Public Health. 2019 Jun 04;7:141
pubmed: 31214561
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Apr;31(4):443-53
pubmed: 15743980
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2009 Aug;13(3):194-218
pubmed: 19622800
Community Ment Health J. 2012 Dec;48(6):729-40
pubmed: 22038420
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 6;14(9):e0221953
pubmed: 31490981
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2016 Jun;6(2):49-57
pubmed: 26164280
PLoS Curr. 2016 Sep 15;8:
pubmed: 27790381
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 13;8(11):e78983
pubmed: 24236079
Am J Public Health. 2000 Apr;90(4):615-7
pubmed: 10754978
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Oct;57(4):855-877
pubmed: 30079590
Br J Soc Psychol. 2001 Sep;40(Pt 3):359-84
pubmed: 11593939
Am J Public Health. 2003 Nov;93(11):1887-8
pubmed: 14600058
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Jul 1;187(7):1467-1476
pubmed: 29762649
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Aug;74(8):617-619
pubmed: 32385125
Disasters. 1991 Mar;15(1):12-23
pubmed: 20958711
Br J Soc Psychol. 2009 Mar;48(Pt 1):115-34
pubmed: 18534045
Br J Soc Psychol. 2009 Sep;48(Pt 3):487-506
pubmed: 18789185
BMJ. 2009 Jul 02;339:b2651
pubmed: 19574308