Psychosocial empowerment-based interventions for smoking reduction: concepts, measures and outcomes. A systematic review.

empowerment / power evaluation outcomes smoking

Journal

Global health promotion
ISSN: 1757-9767
Titre abrégé: Glob Health Promot
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101497462

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 26 6 2020
medline: 18 9 2021
entrez: 26 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Although empowerment is a widely used concept in health-related areas, its definition remains unclear. While there is evidence for the effectiveness of empowerment interventions in improving some psychosocial factors linked to health (e.g. patient self-care strategy, coping skills, access and effective use of health services) and some health outcomes like mental health and HIV/AIDS-related behaviour, other data appear to contradict this. Moreover, concepts, measures, and outcomes related to empowerment are operationalized in different ways. Using the case of tobacco control programmes, we wanted to explore: (a) how research on smoking reduction/prevention has conceptualized empowerment; (b) which measures and instruments have been used to assess behaviour outcomes and the empowerment process. We hypothesized that the transformative potential that characterizes empowerment is marginally considered.A total of 18 studies reporting on the effect of prevention interventions on smoking and/or empowerment outcomes were reviewed. Two kinds of study were distinguished: (a) studies reporting behaviour outcomes without data about the impact on empowerment; (b) studies analysing the empowerment process. Among this latter type, some studies did not provide information about the specific behaviour (smoking), while others examined the impact of intervention on both smoking and empowerment. In about half of all studies, empowerment strategies were found to be effective in improving smoking outcomes, while no differences were found between intervention and control groups in the remaining studies. The present review suggests that pragmatic definitions of empowerment need to be developed in order to promote its transferability and evaluation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32583747
doi: 10.1177/1757975920929400
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

88-96

Auteurs

Alessandro Coppo (A)

Department of Translational Medicine, Avogadro University, Novara, Italy.

Silvia Gattino (S)

Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Italy.

Fabrizio Faggiano (F)

Department of Translational Medicine, Avogadro University, Novara, Italy.

Luisella Gilardi (L)

Dors - Piedmont Regional Health Promotion Documentation Centre - Asl TO3, Torino, Italy.

Paola Capra (P)

Dors - Piedmont Regional Health Promotion Documentation Centre - Asl TO3, Torino, Italy.

Claudio Tortone (C)

Dors - Piedmont Regional Health Promotion Documentation Centre - Asl TO3, Torino, Italy.

Angela Fedi (A)

Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Italy.

Norma De Piccoli (N)

Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH