Treatment Patterns and Characteristics of Individuals Initiating High-Dose Insulin for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
/ diagnosis
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Female
Humans
Hypoglycemic Agents
/ administration & dosage
Insulin
/ administration & dosage
Insurance Claim Review
/ trends
Male
Medication Adherence
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Journal
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
ISSN: 2376-1032
Titre abrégé: J Manag Care Spec Pharm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101644425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
entrez:
26
6
2020
pubmed:
26
6
2020
medline:
2
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Few studies have examined patient characteristics and treatment patterns of high-dose insulin therapy (> 200 units/day) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). To understand patient characteristics, dosing, adherence, and persistence related to high-dose insulin therapy. This was a retrospective observational study that used administrative claims from a large national health plan. Patients were identified who had been diagnosed with T2DM and who were aged 18-89 years, enrolled in a commercial or Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug plan, newly initiated on a total daily dose (TDD) > 200 units of insulin between January 2011 and August 2015. Patients were required to be enrolled 6 months before and 12 months after the index date. Patients were categorized to Regimen-100 if treated with U-100 insulin only or Regimen-500 if treated with U-500R with or without U-100. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were evaluated. An adjustment factor for the days supply was calculated as the ratio of median time between insulin claims, and median pharmacy reported days supply for each insulin prescription. Adjusted days supply, quantity, and concentration were used to calculate TDD for each quarter after the index date. Adherence was measured as the proportion of days covered (PDC) for each regimen. Persistence was measured in 2 ways: the percentage of patients remaining on index medications in each quarter and the proportion of patients who maintained TDD > 200 units during all 4 quarters of the 12-month post-index period. We identified 2,339 patients newly titrated up to TDD > 200 units on either Regimen-100 (2,062, 88.2%) or Regimen-500 (277, 11.8%). Patients on Regimen-500 were slightly younger with higher prevalence of comorbidities. The mean TDD (SD) for Regimen-100 decreased from 228.6 (36.0) units during the first quarter to 194.2 (181.4) units during the last quarter. The mean TDD (SD) for Regimen-500 increased from 294.2 (102.2) units in the first quarter to 304.8 (281.6) units in last quarter. The average adherence to the high-dose insulin regimen was 68.2% (30.7; median 72.6%) for the Regimen-100 cohort and 75.5% (27.0; median 85.2%) for the Regimen-500 cohort. In the Regimen-100 and Regimen-500 cohorts, 45.3% and 55.2% had a PDC ≥ 80%, respectively. Only 23.0% and 51.6% of patients maintained TDD > 200 units for the Regimen-100 and Regimen-500 cohorts, respectively, throughout the 4 quarters after the index date. We observed that many patients did not maintain high-dose insulin use over time, especially those on standard U-100 insulin only. This dosing pattern appears to reflect the differences in patient characteristics, insulin needs, and adherence/persistence behavior between those on Regimen-100 and those on Regimen-500. This study was supported by funding from Eli Lilly and Company to Humana as a collaborative research project involving employees of both companies. Chen, Brown, Fan, Taylor, and He are employees of Eli Lilly and Company. Nair and Meah are employees of Humana, which received funding to complete this research. Siadaty was an employee of Humana at the time of this study.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Few studies have examined patient characteristics and treatment patterns of high-dose insulin therapy (> 200 units/day) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To understand patient characteristics, dosing, adherence, and persistence related to high-dose insulin therapy.
METHODS
METHODS
This was a retrospective observational study that used administrative claims from a large national health plan. Patients were identified who had been diagnosed with T2DM and who were aged 18-89 years, enrolled in a commercial or Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug plan, newly initiated on a total daily dose (TDD) > 200 units of insulin between January 2011 and August 2015. Patients were required to be enrolled 6 months before and 12 months after the index date. Patients were categorized to Regimen-100 if treated with U-100 insulin only or Regimen-500 if treated with U-500R with or without U-100. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were evaluated. An adjustment factor for the days supply was calculated as the ratio of median time between insulin claims, and median pharmacy reported days supply for each insulin prescription. Adjusted days supply, quantity, and concentration were used to calculate TDD for each quarter after the index date. Adherence was measured as the proportion of days covered (PDC) for each regimen. Persistence was measured in 2 ways: the percentage of patients remaining on index medications in each quarter and the proportion of patients who maintained TDD > 200 units during all 4 quarters of the 12-month post-index period.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We identified 2,339 patients newly titrated up to TDD > 200 units on either Regimen-100 (2,062, 88.2%) or Regimen-500 (277, 11.8%). Patients on Regimen-500 were slightly younger with higher prevalence of comorbidities. The mean TDD (SD) for Regimen-100 decreased from 228.6 (36.0) units during the first quarter to 194.2 (181.4) units during the last quarter. The mean TDD (SD) for Regimen-500 increased from 294.2 (102.2) units in the first quarter to 304.8 (281.6) units in last quarter. The average adherence to the high-dose insulin regimen was 68.2% (30.7; median 72.6%) for the Regimen-100 cohort and 75.5% (27.0; median 85.2%) for the Regimen-500 cohort. In the Regimen-100 and Regimen-500 cohorts, 45.3% and 55.2% had a PDC ≥ 80%, respectively. Only 23.0% and 51.6% of patients maintained TDD > 200 units for the Regimen-100 and Regimen-500 cohorts, respectively, throughout the 4 quarters after the index date.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We observed that many patients did not maintain high-dose insulin use over time, especially those on standard U-100 insulin only. This dosing pattern appears to reflect the differences in patient characteristics, insulin needs, and adherence/persistence behavior between those on Regimen-100 and those on Regimen-500.
DISCLOSURES
BACKGROUND
This study was supported by funding from Eli Lilly and Company to Humana as a collaborative research project involving employees of both companies. Chen, Brown, Fan, Taylor, and He are employees of Eli Lilly and Company. Nair and Meah are employees of Humana, which received funding to complete this research. Siadaty was an employee of Humana at the time of this study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32584684
doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.7.839
pmc: PMC10391183
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hypoglycemic Agents
0
Insulin
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
839-847Références
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Sep;25(9):2303-10
pubmed: 19635045
Am J Manag Care. 2009 Jun 01;15(6):e22-33
pubmed: 19514806
Diabet Med. 2013 May;30(5):512-24
pubmed: 23323988
Med Care. 2005 Jun;43(6):521-30
pubmed: 15908846
J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jun;45(6):613-9
pubmed: 1607900
Circulation. 2016 Jan 26;133(4):e38-360
pubmed: 26673558
Am J Manag Care. 2012 Nov;18(11):721-6
pubmed: 23198714
Med Care. 2002 Aug;40(8):675-85
pubmed: 12187181
J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Dec;53(12):1258-67
pubmed: 11146273
Diabetes Care. 2004 Dec;27(12):2800-5
pubmed: 15562188
Value Health. 2008 Jan-Feb;11(1):44-7
pubmed: 18237359
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Mar 01;6(2):412-20
pubmed: 22538155
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Mar;23(3):278-290
pubmed: 28230445
Diabetologia. 2012 Jun;55(6):1577-96
pubmed: 22526604
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Mar;95(3):340-4
pubmed: 22088791
J Manag Care Pharm. 2006 Mar;12(2):130-42
pubmed: 16515371
J Med Econ. 2011;14(1):75-86
pubmed: 21231863
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;90(3):231-42
pubmed: 20724017
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32(4):669-80
pubmed: 26703951
Diabetes Educ. 2014 Mar-Apr;40(2):153-65
pubmed: 24159006
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Sep;18(7):527-39
pubmed: 22971206
Endocr Pract. 2015 Jul;21(7):782-93
pubmed: 25813411
Am J Manag Care. 2004 Feb;10(2 Pt 2):144-51
pubmed: 15005507
Endocr Pract. 2009 Jan-Feb;15(1):71-9
pubmed: 19211405
Endocr Pract. 2014 Jan;20(1):52-61
pubmed: 24013990
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Sep 30;14(1):139
pubmed: 27716283
Clin Ther. 2015 Oct 1;37(10):2297-2308.e1
pubmed: 26341171
Diabetes Ther. 2014 Jun;5(1):225-42
pubmed: 24782063
Diabet Med. 2012 May;29(5):682-9
pubmed: 22313123
J Med Econ. 2013;16(4):529-38
pubmed: 23363330
Diabetes Educ. 2016 Feb;42(1):34-71
pubmed: 26637240
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2015 Apr 30;3(1):e000074
pubmed: 25969741
BMC Endocr Disord. 2011 Jan 12;11:3
pubmed: 21226935
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Sep;27(9):1709-17
pubmed: 21740289
Endocr Pract. 2014 Jul;20(7):663-70
pubmed: 24449672
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Sep 25;166(17):1836-41
pubmed: 17000939
Diabetes Care. 2010 Feb;33(2):240-5
pubmed: 20103556
Am J Manag Care. 2008 Jan;14(1):15-23
pubmed: 18197741
J Diabetes Complications. 2017 Jun;31(6):1007-1013
pubmed: 28416120