Clinical Significance of Circulating Tumor Cells in Hormone Receptor-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients who Received Letrozole with or Without Bevacizumab.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bevacizumab
/ therapeutic use
Breast Neoplasms
/ blood
Cell Count
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
/ methods
Female
Humans
Letrozole
/ therapeutic use
Middle Aged
Neoplastic Cells, Circulating
/ pathology
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Progression-Free Survival
Receptors, Estrogen
/ analysis
Receptors, Progesterone
/ analysis
Survival Rate
Young Adult
Journal
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
ISSN: 1557-3265
Titre abrégé: Clin Cancer Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502500
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 09 2020
15 09 2020
Historique:
received:
10
04
2020
revised:
08
06
2020
accepted:
19
06
2020
pubmed:
27
6
2020
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
27
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) hormone receptor-positive (HR Blood samples were collected at pretreatment and three additional time points during therapy. The presence of ≥5 CTCs per 7.5 mL of blood was considered CTC positive. Association of CTCs with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed using Cox regression models. Of 343 patients treated, 294 had CTC data and were included in this analysis. Median follow-up was 39 months. In multivariable analysis, CTC-positive patients at baseline (31%) had significantly reduced PFS [HR, 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12-1.97] and OS (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.49-2.93) compared with CTC negative. Failure to clear CTCs during treatment was associated with significantly increased risk of progression (HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.58-3.07) and death (HR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.36-4.88). CTC-positive patients who received only letrozole had the worse PFS (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.54-3.47) and OS (HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.59-4.40). Median PFS in CTC-positive patients was significantly longer (18.0 vs. 7.0 months) in letrozole plus bevacizumab versus letrozole arm ( CTCs were highly prognostic for the addition of bevacizumab to first-line letrozole in patients with HR+ MBC in CALGB 40503. Further research to determine the potential predictive value of CTCs in this setting is warranted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32586939
pii: 1078-0432.CCR-20-1329
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-1329
pmc: PMC7501177
mid: NIHMS1607185
doi:
Substances chimiques
Receptors, Estrogen
0
Receptors, Progesterone
0
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
Letrozole
7LKK855W8I
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4911-4920Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233290
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233329
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180821
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233373
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233180
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180882
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U24 CA196171
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180820
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180888
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.
Références
BMC Cancer. 2014 Jul 11;14:512
pubmed: 25015676
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 20;33(33):3968-71
pubmed: 26392104
Angiogenesis. 2020 May;23(2):193-202
pubmed: 31773439
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(9):1037-1048
pubmed: 26272770
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 1;34(22):2602-9
pubmed: 27138575
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jan 1;28(1):103-109
pubmed: 28177480
Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966 Mar;50(3):163-70
pubmed: 5910392
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Dec;160(3):411-424
pubmed: 27761678
Ann Oncol. 2010 May;21(5):1006-12
pubmed: 19861577
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 1;32(31):3483-9
pubmed: 24888818
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019 Feb;134:39-45
pubmed: 30771872
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Apr;15(4):406-14
pubmed: 24636208
Ann Oncol. 2011 Aug;22(8):1929-30
pubmed: 21633048
Anticancer Res. 2011 Mar;31(3):979-84
pubmed: 21498725
Nature. 2005 Dec 15;438(7070):967-74
pubmed: 16355214
N Engl J Med. 2004 Aug 19;351(8):781-91
pubmed: 15317891
Ann Oncol. 2010 Sep;21(9):1765-1771
pubmed: 20233745
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Feb;173(3):489-497
pubmed: 30382472
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 14;365(2):e2
pubmed: 21707384
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Feb 1;13(3):920-8
pubmed: 17289886
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Nov 1;109(11):
pubmed: 29059427
Cell. 2009 Dec 24;139(7):1315-26
pubmed: 20064377
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 1;27(31):5153-9
pubmed: 19752342
Stat Med. 2011 Aug 30;30(19):2409-21
pubmed: 21611958
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Dec 15;15(24):7652-7657
pubmed: 19996223
Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Jul 15;12(14 Pt 1):4218-24
pubmed: 16857794
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Mar 1;21(5):1098-105
pubmed: 25524311
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 1;34(25):3069-103
pubmed: 27217461
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015 Aug;13(8):e56-64
pubmed: 26285250