Characterization of feeding behavior traits in steers with divergent residual feed intake consuming a high-concentrate diet.
GrowSafe
beef cattle
day-to-day variation
feed efficiency
feed intake
feeding behavior
Journal
Journal of animal science
ISSN: 1525-3163
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003002
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jul 2020
01 Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
03
09
2019
accepted:
22
06
2020
pubmed:
27
6
2020
medline:
24
11
2020
entrez:
27
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective of this study was to examine the differences in feeding behavior patterns of steers with divergent phenotypes for residual feed intake (RFI). Three trials were conducted with 508 Angus-based composite crossbred steers (body weight [BW] = 309 ± 57 kg) fed a high-concentrate diet in pens equipped with electronic feed bunks (GrowSafe System). Initial and final carcass ultrasound measurements (intra-muscular fat, backfat depth, and rib-eye area) were collected on days 0 and 70, and BW measured at 14-d intervals. Individual dry matter intake (DMI) and feeding behavior traits were collected for 70 d, and RFI calculated as the residual from the regression of DMI on average daily gain (ADG) and mid-test BW0.75. Steers were ranked by RFI and assigned to low-, medium-, and high-RFI classes based on ± 0.5 SD from the mean RFI within the trial. The feeding behavior traits evaluated in this study included frequency and duration of bunk visit (BV) and meal events, head-down (HD) duration, mean meal length, time-to-bunk interval, the maximum nonfeeding interval, and the day-to-day variation of these traits, defined as the root mean squared error (RMSE) from linear regression of each trait on the day of trial. Additionally, three ratio traits were evaluated: BV events per meal, HD duration per BV event, and HD duration per meal event. Low-RFI (feed-efficient) steers consumed 16% less (P < 0.01) DMI, while BW and ADG were not different compared with high-RFI steers. Low-RFI steers had 18% fewer and 21% shorter (P < 0.01) BV events, and 11% fewer and 13% shorter (P < 0.01) meal events per day compared with high-RFI steers. Furthermore, low-RFI steers exhibited less (P < 0.05) day-to-day variance in DMI, as well as in frequency and duration of BV and meal events and HD duration compared with high-RFI steers. Differences in feeding behavior traits due to RFI were minimally affected by covariate adjustment for DMI, indicating that steers with divergent RFI have distinct feeding behavior patterns that are largely independent of differences in DMI. These results suggest that feeding behavior traits may be useful biomarkers for the prediction of feed efficiency in beef cattle.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32589744
pii: 5863382
doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa189
pmc: PMC7357578
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Animal. 2018 Dec;12(s2):s321-s335
pubmed: 30139392
J Anim Sci. 2014 Nov;92(11):5214-21
pubmed: 25349363
J Anim Sci. 2010 Jan;88(1):315-23
pubmed: 19717764
J Anim Sci. 1979 Jun;48(6):1501-8
pubmed: 479044
J Anim Sci. 1995 Jan;73(1):39-44
pubmed: 7601752
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Aug;92(8):3922-9
pubmed: 19620675
J Anim Sci. 2003 Nov;81(11):2869-79
pubmed: 14601891
Anim Behav. 1999 Apr;57(4):807-817
pubmed: 10202089
J Anim Sci. 2006 Jan;84(1):145-53
pubmed: 16361501
J Anim Sci. 2012 Aug;90(8):2750-3
pubmed: 22408083
J Anim Sci. 2005 Apr;83(4):777-85
pubmed: 15753331
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Mar;91(3):1115-21
pubmed: 18292267
J Anim Sci. 2013 Nov;91(11):5492-9
pubmed: 23989865
J Anim Sci. 2018 Apr 3;96(3):990-1009
pubmed: 29385602
J Anim Sci. 2008 Jan;86(1):180-6
pubmed: 17785590
J Anim Sci. 2007 Oct;85(10):2382-90
pubmed: 17591713
J Anim Sci. 2011 Sep;89(9):2904-10
pubmed: 21512115
J Dairy Sci. 1991 Oct;74(10):3583-97
pubmed: 1660498
J Anim Sci. 2010 Jan;88(1):109-23
pubmed: 19820067
J Anim Sci. 1998 Oct;76(10):2701-5
pubmed: 9814912
J Dairy Sci. 1999 Jan;82(1):99-109
pubmed: 10022012
J Theor Biol. 2001 Dec 7;213(3):413-25
pubmed: 11735288
Animal. 2018 Sep;12(9):1815-1826
pubmed: 29779496
J Anim Sci. 2006 Jul;84(7):1951-67
pubmed: 16775080
J Anim Sci. 2013 Nov;91(11):5353-65
pubmed: 23989881
J Anim Sci. 2010 Mar;88(3):885-94
pubmed: 19966161
J Anim Sci. 2009 Dec;87(12):3887-96
pubmed: 19717782
J Anim Sci. 2014 May;92(5):2170-81
pubmed: 24663212
J Anim Sci. 2019 Apr 29;97(5):2202-2219
pubmed: 30789654
J Anim Sci. 2011 Jan;89(1):158-67
pubmed: 20817856
J Anim Sci. 1988 Feb;66(2):513-21
pubmed: 3372389
Front Genet. 2019 Jan 08;9:660
pubmed: 30671080
J Anim Sci. 2011 Apr;89(4):1028-34
pubmed: 21112981
Animal. 2010 May;4(5):692-701
pubmed: 22444121
J Anim Sci. 2000 Aug;78(8):2215-22
pubmed: 10947111
J Anim Sci. 2014 Feb;92(2):549-60
pubmed: 24398827
J Anim Sci. 2011 Mar;89(3):639-47
pubmed: 21036935
J Anim Sci. 1997 Aug;75(8):2024-32
pubmed: 9263047
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Mar;95(3):1323-36
pubmed: 22365214
J Anim Sci. 2011 Apr;89(4):1180-92
pubmed: 21415425