Excess sulfur and Fe elements drive changes in soil and vegetation at abandoned coal gangues, Guizhou China.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 06 2020
Historique:
received: 18 12 2019
accepted: 27 05 2020
entrez: 28 6 2020
pubmed: 28 6 2020
medline: 15 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Coal gangue piles accumulate outside mines and can persist for years, negatively impacting the regional environment. To determine the main cause of soil pollution at coal gangues, several coal gangues in Guizhou Province, China that had undergone natural recovery via native plants for 8 years were investigated in summer 2019. Three plots (2 m × 2 m) from the coal gangue area were selected for the treatment (GP). Control plots that were 100 m away from GP were also investigated in contrast (CK-near). In addition, plots from forest, farmland and lake land that were far from GP and largely undisturbed were also investigated as more extreme contrasts (CK-far). A series of soil indicators that can be affected by coal-gangue, such as heavy metals (Mn, Cr, Cd, Ni, Zn, Cu, Pb), As, pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), sulfur (S) and iron (Fe), were tested for in the plots. Plant species, coverage and height were also analyzed to uncover biodiversity and dominant species information. The results suggested that coal gangue significantly influences soil S, pH and plant species after 8 years of natural recovery. The CK-far plots contained relatively low soil sulfur content, normal pH (close to 7) and abundant plant biodiversity. Generally, pH related positively with both the Patrick (R = 0.79, n = 22, p < 0.001) and Shannon indices (R = 0.67, n = 22, p < 0.001); the soil S related negatively with both the Patrick (R = 0.85, n = 22, p < 0.001) and Shannon indices (R = - 0.79, n = 22, p < 0.001). S content was highest (S = 1.0%) in GP plots, was lower in CK-near plots (S = 0.3%) and was the lowest of all in the plots distant from the coal mine (S = 0.1%, CK-far). S content was negatively correlated with pH. Soil pH decreased significantly, from 7.0 in CK-far, to 5.9 in CK-near, to 4.2 in GP. Soil Fe was 3.4 times higher in GP and CK-near than in CK-far. The excess sulfur and Fe elements and the acidified soil drove changes in soil and vegetation in the coal gangue areas. After 8 years of natural recovery, only a few plants, like Miscanthus floridulus, were able to live near the coal gangue in the area where the soil was still acidic and high in S and Fe.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32591606
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67311-z
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-67311-z
pmc: PMC7320150
doi:

Substances chimiques

Industrial Waste 0
Metals, Heavy 0
Soil 0
Sulfur 70FD1KFU70
Iron E1UOL152H7

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

10456

Références

Jiang, X., Lu, W. X. & Zhao, H. Q. Potential ecological risk assessment and prediction of soil heavy-metal pollution around coal gangue dump. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 14, 1599–1610 (2014).
doi: 10.5194/nhess-14-1599-2014
Hudson-Edwards, K. A., Jamieson, H. E. & Lottermoser, B. G. Mine wastes: past, present, future. Elements 7(6), 375–380 (2011).
doi: 10.2113/gselements.7.6.375
Querol, X., Izquierdo, M. & Monfort, E. Environmental characterization of burnt coal gangue banks at Yangquan, Shanxi Province, China. Int. J. Coal Geol. 75, 93–104 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2008.04.003
Zhang, H. & Ouyang, S. Release characteristics of heavy metals from coal gangue under simulation leaching conditions. Energy Explor. Exploit. 32, 413–422 (2014).
doi: 10.1260/0144-5987.32.2.413
May, G. A descriptive history of the town of Evesham, from the foundation of its Saxon monastery: with notices respecting the ancient deanery of the vale (classic reprint). J. Geochem. Explor. 112, 152–160 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2011.08.012
Chen, Y. X., Lin, Q. & Luo, Y. M. The role of citric acid on the phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soil. Chemosphere 50, 807–811 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00223-0
Chudy, K., Marszałek, H. & Kierczak, J. Impact of hard-coal waste dump on water quality—a case study of Ludwikowice Kłodzkie (Nowa Ruda Coalfield, SW Poland). J. Geochem. Explor. 146, 127–135 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2014.08.011
Glauser, S., Mcallister, M. L. & Milioli, G. The challenges of sustainability in mining regions: The coal mining region of Santa Catarina, Brazil. Nat. Resour. Forum 29, 1–11 (2005).
doi: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2005.00108.x
Xu, L., Zhang, H. & Sang, S. X. Geochemistry behavior of trace elements in bastard coal. Coal Geol. Explor. 30, 1–3 (2002).
Azeue, J. M. Environmental Impacts of Mining Activities: Emphasis on Mitigation and Remedial Measures (Springer, New York, 1999).
Novikova, S. P. & Gas’kova, O. L. Influence of natural fulvic acids on the solubility of sulfide ores (experimental study). Russ. Geol. Geophys. 54, 509–517 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.rgg.2013.04.003
Bayramoglu, G., Arica, M. Y. & Adiguzel, N. Removal of Ni (II) and Cu (II) ions using native and acid treated Ni-hyperaccumulator plant Alyssum discolor from Turkish serpentine soil. Chemosphere 89, 302–309 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.04.042
Sarwar, N., Imran, M. & Shaheen, M. R. Phytoremediation strategies for soils contaminated with heavy metals: modifications and future perspectives. Chemosphere 171, 710–721 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.12.116
Oláh, V., Hepp, A. & Mészáros, I. Comparative study on the sensitivity of turions and active fronds of giant duckweed (Spirodela polyrhiza (L.) Schleiden) to heavy metal treatments. Chemosphere 132, 40–46 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.01.050
Koptsik, G. N. Problems and prospects concerning the phytoremediation of heavy metal polluted soils: a review. Eurasian Soil Sci. 47, 923–939 (2014).
doi: 10.1134/S1064229314090075
Yakun, S., Xingmin, M. & Kairong, L. Soil characterization and differential patterns of heavy metal accumulation in woody plants grown in coal gangue wastelands in Shaanxi, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23, 13489–13497 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6432-8
Wu, F. Y., Bi, Y. L. & Leung, H. M. Accumulation of As, Pb, Zn, Cd and Cu and arbuscular mycorrhizal status in populations of Cynodon dactylon grown on metal-contaminated soils. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 44, 210–218 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.12.008
Ao, W. H. & Huang, W. H. Effect of the waste dump on environmental in Wuda mining area Inner Mongolia. J. China Coal Soc. 30, 656–660 (2005).
Hajizadeh, N. H., Li, S. & Jiang, L. Numerical simulation of water flow in a large waste rock pile, Haizhou coal mine, China. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 1, 1–5 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s40808-015-0002-9
Xue, Q., Lu, H. & Zhao, Y. The metal ions release and microstructure of coal gangue corroded by acid-based chemical solution. Environ. Earth Sci. 71, 3235–3244 (2014).
doi: 10.1007/s12665-013-2743-y
Chen, G. & Ling, L. U. Spatial distribution and variation of coalbed methane reservoir characteristics and its significance for CBM development in Western Guizhou. J. China Coal Soc. 41, 2006–2016 (2016).
Liu, B. et al. Vegetation recovery and groundwater pollution control of coal gangue field in a semi-arid area for a field application. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 128, 134–140 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.01.032
Glowacka, K. A review of the genetic study of the energy crop Miscanthus. Biomass Bioenergy 35, 2445–2454 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.041
Schwartsburd, P. B. & Prado, J. Subspecies of Hypolepis rugosula (Dennstaedtiaceae; Pteridophyta) around the world: morphological and biogeographic perspectives. Acta Bot. Bras. 28, 206–226 (2014).
doi: 10.1590/S0102-33062014000200008
van Breemen, N., Driscoll, C. T. & Mulder, J. Acidic deposition and internal proton sources in acidification of soils and waters. Nature 307, 599–604 (1984).
doi: 10.1038/307599a0
Butcher, S. S., Charlson, R. J. & Orians, G. H. Global Bio-geochemical Cycles (Academic Press, San Diego, 1992).
Delhaize, E. & Raye, P. R. Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plant. Plant Physiol. 107, 315–321 (1995).
doi: 10.1104/pp.107.2.315
Yong, J., Tian, L. I. & Xue, F. Effects of exogenous sulfur input on nutrient availability in soil-plant system of grassland. Chin. J. Ecol. 38, 1192–1201 (2019).
Owen, K. M., Marrs, R. H. & Snow, C. S. R. Soil acidification-the use of sulphur and acidic plant materials to acidify arable soils for the recreation of heathland and acidic grassland at Minsmere, UK. Biol. Conserv. 87, 105–121 (1999).
doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00027-5
Cai, J. P., Weiner, J. & Wang, R. Z. Effects of nitrogen and water addition on trace element stoichiometry in five grassland species. J. Plant Res. 130, 659–668 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s10265-017-0928-2
Chen, Z. et al. Effects of organic acids on dissolution of Fe and Mn from weathering coal gangue. Chin. J. Geochem. 35, 316–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11631-016-0104-8 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s11631-016-0104-8
Lee, J. U., Kim, S. M., Kim, K. W. & Kim, I. S. Microbial removal of uranium in uranium-bearing black shale. Chemosphere 59, 1147–1154 (2005).
Chuncai, Z., Guijian, L. & Dun, W. Mobility behavior and environmental implications of trace elements associated with coal gangue: a case study at the Huainan Coalfield in China. Chemosphere 95, 193–199 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.08.065
Local governments publish data sets by Huaxi District. https://www.huaxi.gov.cn/zfsj/sjfb/zrzy/202004/t20200422_56183122.html (2020).
Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. Soil and sediment—determination of aqua regia extracts of 12 metal elements- Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. HJ 803, 1–10. https://kjs.mee.gov.cn/hjbhbz.bz (2016).
R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. https://www.R-project.org (2005).

Auteurs

Junyong Ma (J)

State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.

Zhanjun Quan (Z)

State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China. quanzj@craes.org.cn.

Yibo Sun (Y)

State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.

Jiaqiang Du (J)

State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.

Bo Liu (B)

State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Aspergillus Hydrogen-Ion Concentration Coculture Techniques Secondary Metabolism Streptomyces rimosus
Humans Neoplasms Male Female Middle Aged
Humans Male Female Aged Middle Aged

Classifications MeSH