Pouch failures following restorative proctocolectomy in ulcerative colitis.
IBD surgery
Ileal pouch
Pouch failure
Restorative proctocolectomy
anal anastomosis
Journal
International journal of colorectal disease
ISSN: 1432-1262
Titre abrégé: Int J Colorectal Dis
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8607899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
accepted:
17
06
2020
pubmed:
28
6
2020
medline:
24
6
2021
entrez:
28
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) is the most common operation in ulcerative colitis. Nevertheless, permanent ileostomy will sometimes be unavoidable. The aim was to evaluate the reasons for pouch failure and early morbidity after pouch excision. The number and the reasons for pouch failures were analysed in patients undergoing RPC 1985-2016. Out of 491 RPC patients, 53 experienced pouch failure (10 women, 43 men); 52 out of 53 underwent pouch excision. The cumulative risk for excision at 5, 10 and 20 years was 5.6, 9.4 and 15.5%, respectively. The reasons for failure included septic events such as fistula in 12 (23%), chronic pouchitis in 11 (21%) and leakage in 8 (15%) patients. Functional reasons for pouch failure were recorded as poor function in 16 (30%), incontinence in 12 (23%) and stricture in 12 (23%) patients. Multiple causes for pouch failure were recorded for individual patients. Seven cases of Crohn's disease were found among the failure cases: two before pouch excision and five after. Altogether, 15 Crohn's disease diagnoses were set in the RPC cohort, giving a percentage of 47% of pouch failure in this disorder. A complication occurred in 23 (44%) patients within 30 days after surgery; 16 were mild (Clavien-Dindo grades I-II). Eleven percent of RPC patients suffered pouch failure: more men than women. The reasons were multiple. Crohn's disease created a risk of failure, but a half of these patients maintained the pouch. Morbidity after pouch excision was moderate, but in most cases slight.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32592093
doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03680-1
pii: 10.1007/s00384-020-03680-1
pmc: PMC7541371
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2027-2033Subventions
Organisme : Competetive state Research financing of the expert responsibiility area of Tampere University hospital
ID : 9P060
Références
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct - Nov;53(10-11):1245-1249
pubmed: 30346218
Colorectal Dis. 2007 Jul;9(6):503-8
pubmed: 17573744
Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 Aug;38(8):793-8
pubmed: 7634973
Dig Surg. 2005;22(1-2):69-79
pubmed: 15838175
Colorectal Dis. 2010 May;12(5):433-41
pubmed: 19226364
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Jun;47(6):869-75
pubmed: 15108024
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
Dis Colon Rectum. 1991 Jun;34(6):475-7
pubmed: 2036927
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Apr;62(4):454-462
pubmed: 30451759
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13
pubmed: 15273542
Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Oct;45(10):1289-94
pubmed: 12394424
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Jan;20(1):44-52
pubmed: 28667683
Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 Aug;39(8):893-8
pubmed: 8756845
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Aug;20(8):O181-O189
pubmed: 29768701
Int J Colorectal Dis. 1997;12(1):4-8
pubmed: 9112142
Ann Surg. 2003 Aug;238(2):229-34
pubmed: 12894016
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Oct;19(10):912-916
pubmed: 28387059
Br Med J. 1978 Jul 8;2(6130):85-8
pubmed: 667572
Br J Surg. 2006 Jan;93(1):82-6
pubmed: 16288450
Dis Colon Rectum. 1997 Mar;40(3):257-62
pubmed: 9118737
Br J Surg. 1998 Jun;85(6):800-3
pubmed: 9667712
Colorectal Dis. 2004 Nov;6(6):494-8
pubmed: 15521942
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Apr;55(4):393-9
pubmed: 22426262
Colorectal Dis. 2009 Sep;11(7):711-8
pubmed: 19708089
Ann Surg. 2003 Oct;238(4):605-14; discussion 614-7
pubmed: 14530732