Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Ovarian Cancer Harboring Somatic PIK3CA or KRAS Mutations.
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ blood
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial
/ blood
Circulating Tumor DNA
/ blood
Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases
/ genetics
Female
Humans
Liquid Biopsy
/ methods
Middle Aged
Mutation
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ blood
Ovarian Neoplasms
/ blood
Preoperative Period
Prognosis
Progression-Free Survival
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
/ genetics
Risk Assessment
/ methods
Biomarker
KRAS
Ovarian neoplasms
PIK3CA
ctDNA
Journal
Cancer research and treatment
ISSN: 2005-9256
Titre abrégé: Cancer Res Treat
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101155137
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
10
11
2019
accepted:
01
05
2020
pubmed:
1
7
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
1
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is an attractive source for liquid biopsy to understand molecular phenotypes of a tumor non-invasively, which is also expected to be both a diagnostic and prognostic marker. PIK3CA and KRAS are among the most frequently mutated genes in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). In addition, their hotspot mutations have already been identified and are ready for a highly sensitive analysis. Our aim is to clarify the significance of PIK3CA and KRAS mutations in the plasma of EOC patients as tumor-informed ctDNA. We screened 306 patients with ovarian tumors for somatic PIK3CA or KRAS mutations. A total of 85 EOC patients had somatic PIK3CA and/or KRAS mutations, and the corresponding mutations were subsequently analyzed using a droplet digital polymerase chain reaction in their plasma. The detection rates for ctDNA were 27% in EOC patients. Advanced stage and positive peritoneal cytology were associated with higher frequency of ctDNA detection. Preoperative ctDNA detection was found to be an indicator of outcomes, and multivariate analysis revealed that ctDNA remained an independent risk factor for recurrence (p=0.010). Moreover, we assessed the mutation frequency in matched plasma before surgery and at recurrence from 17 patients, and found six patients had higher mutation rates in cell-free DNA at recurrence compared to that at primary diagnosis. The presence of ctDNA at diagnosis was an indicator for recurrence, which suggests potential tumor spread even when tumors were localized at the time of diagnosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32599986
pii: crt.2019.688
doi: 10.4143/crt.2019.688
pmc: PMC7577815
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Circulating Tumor DNA
0
KRAS protein, human
0
Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases
EC 2.7.1.137
PIK3CA protein, human
EC 2.7.1.137
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
EC 3.6.5.2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1219-1228Références
J Cancer. 2016 Sep 13;7(13):1907-1914
pubmed: 27698932
J Oncol. 2017;2017:4517834
pubmed: 28392802
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 28;368(13):1199-209
pubmed: 23484797
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Aug;11(8):753-62
pubmed: 20619739
PLoS Med. 2016 Dec 20;13(12):e1002198
pubmed: 27997533
Expert Rev Mol Med. 2018 Dec 18;20:e6
pubmed: 30558693
Cancer Discov. 2014 Jun;4(6):650-61
pubmed: 24801577
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 15;23(18):5437-5445
pubmed: 28600478
Mol Oncol. 2016 Dec;10(10):1575-1584
pubmed: 28949453
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):937-48
pubmed: 26184520
J Breast Cancer. 2017 Mar;20(1):12-19
pubmed: 28382090
Oncotarget. 2018 Feb 22;9(20):15266-15274
pubmed: 29632642
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 10;12(8):e0182562
pubmed: 28796802
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Jun 1;24(11):2688-2699
pubmed: 29463554
Nat Med. 2008 Sep;14(9):985-90
pubmed: 18670422
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004 May-Jun;14(3):459-64
pubmed: 15228418
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jan 1;23(1):116-123
pubmed: 27993964
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep;193(3 Pt 1):662-7
pubmed: 16150257
Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 Jun;9(6):415-28
pubmed: 19461667
Mod Pathol. 2019 Mar;32(3):405-414
pubmed: 30315273
Sci Transl Med. 2017 Aug 16;9(403):
pubmed: 28814544
C R Seances Soc Biol Fil. 1948 Feb;142(3-4):241-3
pubmed: 18875018
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Apr;150(2):299-307
pubmed: 25736040
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0145754
pubmed: 26717006
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108
pubmed: 25651787
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 May;30(3):e32
pubmed: 30887755
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jan 1;28(1):136-141
pubmed: 28177428