Expanding the 3 Wishes Project for compassionate end-of-life care: a qualitative evaluation of local adaptations.
Empathy
End of life care
Intensive care unit
Program evaluation
Qualitative research
Journal
BMC palliative care
ISSN: 1472-684X
Titre abrégé: BMC Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088685
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Jun 2020
30 Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
27
04
2020
accepted:
22
06
2020
entrez:
2
7
2020
pubmed:
2
7
2020
medline:
10
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The 3 Wishes Project (3WP) is an end-of-life program that honors the dignity of dying patients by fostering meaningful connections among patients, families, and clinicians. Since 2013, it has become embedded in the culture of end-of-life care in over 20 ICUs across North America. The purpose of the current study is to describe the variation in implementation of 3WP across sites, in order to ascertain which factors facilitated multicenter implementation, which factors remain consistent across sites, and which may be adapted to suit local needs. Using the methodology of qualitative description, we collected interview and focus group data from 85 clinicians who participated in the successful initiation and sustainment of 3WP in 9 ICUs. We describe the transition between different models of 3WP implementation, from core clinical program to the incorporation of various research activities. We describe various sources of financial and in-kind resources accessed to support the program. Beyond sharing a common goal of improving end-of-life care, sites varied considerably in organizational context, staff complement, and resources. Despite these differences, the program was successfully implemented at each site and eventually evolved from a clinical or research intervention to a general approach to end-of-life care. Key to this success was flexibility and the empowerment of frontline staff to tailor the program to address identified needs with available resources. This adaptability was fueled by cross-pollination of ideas within and outside of each site, resulting in the establishment of a network of like-minded individuals with a shared purpose. The successful initiation and sustainment of 3WP relied on local adaptations to suit organizational needs and resources. The semi-structured nature of the program facilitated these adaptations, encouraged creative and important ways of relating within local clinical cultures, and reinforced the main tenet of the program: meaningful human connection at the end of life. Local adaptations also encouraged a team approach to care, supplementing the typical patient-clinician dyad by explicitly empowering the healthcare team to collectively recognize and respond to the needs of dying patients, families, and each other. NCT04147169 , retrospectively registered with clinicaltrials.gov on October 31, 2019.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The 3 Wishes Project (3WP) is an end-of-life program that honors the dignity of dying patients by fostering meaningful connections among patients, families, and clinicians. Since 2013, it has become embedded in the culture of end-of-life care in over 20 ICUs across North America. The purpose of the current study is to describe the variation in implementation of 3WP across sites, in order to ascertain which factors facilitated multicenter implementation, which factors remain consistent across sites, and which may be adapted to suit local needs.
METHODS
METHODS
Using the methodology of qualitative description, we collected interview and focus group data from 85 clinicians who participated in the successful initiation and sustainment of 3WP in 9 ICUs. We describe the transition between different models of 3WP implementation, from core clinical program to the incorporation of various research activities. We describe various sources of financial and in-kind resources accessed to support the program.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Beyond sharing a common goal of improving end-of-life care, sites varied considerably in organizational context, staff complement, and resources. Despite these differences, the program was successfully implemented at each site and eventually evolved from a clinical or research intervention to a general approach to end-of-life care. Key to this success was flexibility and the empowerment of frontline staff to tailor the program to address identified needs with available resources. This adaptability was fueled by cross-pollination of ideas within and outside of each site, resulting in the establishment of a network of like-minded individuals with a shared purpose.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The successful initiation and sustainment of 3WP relied on local adaptations to suit organizational needs and resources. The semi-structured nature of the program facilitated these adaptations, encouraged creative and important ways of relating within local clinical cultures, and reinforced the main tenet of the program: meaningful human connection at the end of life. Local adaptations also encouraged a team approach to care, supplementing the typical patient-clinician dyad by explicitly empowering the healthcare team to collectively recognize and respond to the needs of dying patients, families, and each other.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
NCT04147169 , retrospectively registered with clinicaltrials.gov on October 31, 2019.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32605623
doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00601-5
pii: 10.1186/s12904-020-00601-5
pmc: PMC7325646
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04147169']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
93Subventions
Organisme : Greenwall Foundation
ID : N/A
Organisme : CSU Institute for Palliative Care
ID : N/A
Organisme : Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
ID : N/A
Organisme : Canadian Intensive Care Foundation
ID : N/A
Organisme : Hamilton Academy of Health Sciences Organization
ID : N/A
Organisme : VITAS Healthcare
ID : N/A
Organisme : Katz Family Foundation
ID : N/A
Organisme : Porath Family Charitable Foundation
ID : N/A
Organisme : Perlman Family Foundation
ID : N/A
Organisme : Wirtschafter Family Foundation
ID : N/A
Organisme : Nova Scotia Health Authority
ID : N/A
Références
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jan 21;:885066619900125
pubmed: 31960743
Palliat Support Care. 2015 Aug;13(4):945-52
pubmed: 25003541
Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40
pubmed: 10940958
JAMA. 2011 Dec 28;306(24):2694-703
pubmed: 22203538
Med Educ. 2017 Jan;51(1):40-50
pubmed: 27981658
JAMA. 2003 Apr 16;289(15):1969-75
pubmed: 12697800
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Jan;32(1):15-7
pubmed: 16292623
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jan 7;172(1):1-11
pubmed: 31711111
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 31;6(3):e010626
pubmed: 27033962
Ann Intern Med. 2000 May 16;132(10):825-32
pubmed: 10819707
J Palliat Med. 2019 Dec;22(12):1561-1567
pubmed: 31274366
J Prim Prev. 2013 Jun;34(3):147-61
pubmed: 23605294
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Aug 18;163(4):271-9
pubmed: 26167721
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan 15;195(2):198-204
pubmed: 27525361
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001 Sep;22(3):727-37
pubmed: 11532586
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Feb 4;:
pubmed: 30723073
Am J Crit Care. 2002 May;11(3):200-9
pubmed: 12022483
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2016 Nov 24;:
pubmed: 27884867
Implement Sci. 2018 Sep 26;13(1):125
pubmed: 30257683
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1802-1811
pubmed: 27340178
J Interprof Care. 2016 Nov;30(6):795-803
pubmed: 27436606