Dental adhesive microtensile bond strength following a biofilm-based in vitro aging model.
Journal
Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB
ISSN: 1678-7765
Titre abrégé: J Appl Oral Sci
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 101189774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
12
12
2019
accepted:
11
05
2020
entrez:
2
7
2020
pubmed:
2
7
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Laboratory tests are routinely used to test bonding properties of dental adhesives. Various aging methods that simulate the oral environment are used to complement these tests for assessment of adhesive bond durability. However, most of these methods challenge hydrolytic and mechanical stability of the adhesive- enamel/dentin interface, and not the biostability of dental adhesives. To compare resin-dentin microtensile bond strength (μTBS) after a 15-day Streptococcus mutans (SM) or Streptococcus sobrinus (SS) bacterial exposure to the 6-month water storage (WS) ISO 11405 type 3 test. A total of 31 molars were flattened and their exposed dentin was restored with Optibond-FL adhesive system and Z-100 dental composite. Each restored molar was sectioned and trimmed into four dumbbell-shaped specimens, and randomly distributed based on the following aging conditions: A) 6 months of WS (n=31), B) 5.5 months of WS + 15 days of a SM-biofilm challenge (n=31), C) 15 days of a SM-biofilm challenge (n=31) and D) 15 days of a SS-biofilm challenge (n=31). μTBS were determined and the failure modes were classified using light microscopy. Statistical analyses showed that each type of aging condition affected μTBS (p<0.0001). For Group A (49.7±15.5MPa), the mean μTBS was significantly greater than in Groups B (19.3±6.3MPa), C (19.9±5.9MPa) and D (23.6±7.9MPa). For Group D, the mean μTBS was also significantly greater than for Groups B and C, but no difference was observed between Groups B and C. A Streptococcus mutans- or Streptococcus sobrinus-based biofilm challenge for 15 days resulted in a significantly lower μTBS than did the ISO 11405 recommended 6 months of water storage. This type of biofilm-based aging model seems to be a practical method for testing biostability of resin-dentin bonding.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32609185
pii: S1678-77572020000100451
doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0737
pmc: PMC7340208
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Composite Resins
0
Dental Cements
0
Dentin-Bonding Agents
0
Resin Cements
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e20190737Références
Dent Mater. 2012 May;28(5):e50-62
pubmed: 22425572
Biomaterials. 2004 Nov;25(24):5467-72
pubmed: 15142727
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013 Feb;18:219-31
pubmed: 23276517
Biomaterials. 2003 Aug;24(19):3345-50
pubmed: 12763461
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009 Feb;88(2):551-60
pubmed: 18314895
J Dent Res. 2010 Jul;89(7):657-65
pubmed: 20448246
J Dent. 1986 Aug;14(4):165-8
pubmed: 3531264
J Dent Res. 1998 Jan;77(1):60-7
pubmed: 9437400
Acta Biomater. 2014 Jan;10(1):375-83
pubmed: 24008178
J Dent Res. 2014 Dec;93(12):1243-9
pubmed: 25190266
Caries Res. 1989;23(1):14-7
pubmed: 2920379
J Dent. 2017 Nov;66:62-70
pubmed: 28843960
J Dent. 2013 Jun;41(6):504-13
pubmed: 23583528
J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 Jan-Feb;22(1):68-72
pubmed: 24626251
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009 Mar;19(2):141-7
pubmed: 19250396
Eur J Oral Sci. 2002 Feb;110(1):48-53
pubmed: 11878760
J Dent Res. 2008 Jan;87(1):89-93
pubmed: 18096901
Acta Odontol Scand. 2012 Mar;70(2):114-21
pubmed: 21780966
Lifetime Data Anal. 1997;3(2):123-37
pubmed: 9384618
J Dent. 2002 Jan;30(1):47-51
pubmed: 11741735
J Dent Res. 2005 Feb;84(2):118-32
pubmed: 15668328
Molecules. 2019 Feb 01;24(3):
pubmed: 30717140
J Dent Res. 2013 Nov;92(11):989-94
pubmed: 24026951
Oper Dent. 2004 Sep-Oct;29(5):481-508
pubmed: 15470871
Dent Mater. 2008 Jun;24(6):732-6
pubmed: 17897707
J Dent Res. 1990 Mar;69(3):861-4
pubmed: 2109000
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Jan;29:295-308
pubmed: 24135128
Oper Dent. 2003 May-Jun;28(3):215-35
pubmed: 12760693
Caries Res. 1991;25(2):116-22
pubmed: 1829395
J Dent Res. 2016 Mar;95(3):327-33
pubmed: 26608579
Microbiology. 2003 Feb;149(Pt 2):279-294
pubmed: 12624191
Dent Mater. 2001 May;17(3):268-76
pubmed: 11257301
Dent Mater. 2013 Jan;29(1):59-84
pubmed: 22920539
Dent Med Probl. 2019 Apr-Jun;56(2):185-190
pubmed: 31274256
Dent Mater. 2010 Feb;26(2):e100-21
pubmed: 20006379
J Oral Microbiol. 2014 Dec 03;6:26189
pubmed: 25475081