The Impact of Robotic-Assisted Surgery on Team Performance: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review.
ergonomics
nontechnical skills
operating room
patient safety
workflow
Journal
Human factors
ISSN: 1547-8181
Titre abrégé: Hum Factors
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0374660
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
3
7
2020
medline:
11
3
2022
entrez:
3
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study is to describe the impact of robotic-assisted surgery on team performance in the operating room. The introduction of surgical robots has improved the technical performance of surgical procedures but has also contributed to unexpected interactions in surgical teams, leading to new types of errors. A systematic literature search of Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, ProQuest, Cochrane, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases using key words and MeSH terms was conducted. Screening identified studies employing qualitative and quantitative methods published between January 2000 and September 2019. Two reviewers independently appraised the methodological quality of the articles using the Combined searches identified 1,065 citations. Of these, 19 articles, 16 quantitative and 3 qualitative, were included. Robotic-assisted surgeries included urology, gynecology, cardiac, and general procedures involving surgeons, anesthetists, nurses, and technicians. Three themes emerged Inclusion of a robot as a team member adds further complexity to the work of surgery. These review findings will inform training programs specifically designed to optimize teamwork, workflow efficiency, and learning needs.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study is to describe the impact of robotic-assisted surgery on team performance in the operating room.
BACKGROUND
The introduction of surgical robots has improved the technical performance of surgical procedures but has also contributed to unexpected interactions in surgical teams, leading to new types of errors.
METHOD
A systematic literature search of Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, ProQuest, Cochrane, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases using key words and MeSH terms was conducted. Screening identified studies employing qualitative and quantitative methods published between January 2000 and September 2019. Two reviewers independently appraised the methodological quality of the articles using the
RESULTS
Combined searches identified 1,065 citations. Of these, 19 articles, 16 quantitative and 3 qualitative, were included. Robotic-assisted surgeries included urology, gynecology, cardiac, and general procedures involving surgeons, anesthetists, nurses, and technicians. Three themes emerged
CONCLUSION
Inclusion of a robot as a team member adds further complexity to the work of surgery.
APPLICATION
These review findings will inform training programs specifically designed to optimize teamwork, workflow efficiency, and learning needs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32613863
doi: 10.1177/0018720820928624
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM