Weekly platinum-based chemotherapy versus 3-weekly platinum-based chemotherapy for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer (ICON8): quality-of-life results of a phase 3, randomised, controlled trial.


Journal

The Lancet. Oncology
ISSN: 1474-5488
Titre abrégé: Lancet Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100957246

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2020
Historique:
received: 18 02 2020
revised: 30 03 2020
accepted: 31 03 2020
entrez: 3 7 2020
pubmed: 3 7 2020
medline: 17 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The ICON8 study reported no significant improvement in progression-free survival (a primary endpoint) with weekly chemotherapy compared with standard 3-weekly treatment among patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. All ICON8 patients were eligible to take part in the accompanying health-related quality-of-life study, which measured the effect of treatment on self-reported wellbeing, reported here. In this open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3, three-arm, Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) trial done at 117 hospital sites in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, South Korea, and Republic of Ireland, women (aged at least 18 years) with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IC-IV ovarian cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were randomly assigned (1:1:1) centrally using minimisation to group 1 (intravenous carboplatin area under the curve [AUC]5 or AUC6 and 175 mg/m Between June 6, 2011, and Nov 28, 2014, 1566 patients were recruited into ICON8 (522 were included in group 1, 523 in group 2, and 521 in group 3). Baseline quality-of-life questionnaires were completed by 1438 (92%) of 1566 patients and 9-month questionnaires by 882 (69%) of 1280 patients. We observed no significant difference in global health score at 9 months (cross-sectional analysis) between study groups (group 2 vs group 1, difference in mean score 2·3, 95% CI -0·4 to 4·9, p=0·095; group 3 vs group 1, -0·8, -3·8 to 2·2, p=0·61). Using longitudinal analysis, we found lower global health scores for those receiving weekly paclitaxel than for those receiving 3-weekly chemotherapy (group 2 vs group 1, mean difference -1·8, 95% CI -3·6 to -0·1, p=0·043; group 3 vs group 1, -2·9, -4·7 to -1·1, p=0·0018). We found no evidence of a difference in global quality of life between treatment groups at 9 months; however, patients receiving weekly treatment reported lower mean quality of life across the 9-month period after randomisation. Taken together with the lack of progression-free survival benefit, these findings do not support routine use of weekly paclitaxel-containing regimens in the management of newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. Cancer Research UK, Medical Research Council, Health Research Board Ireland, Irish Cancer Society, and Cancer Australia.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The ICON8 study reported no significant improvement in progression-free survival (a primary endpoint) with weekly chemotherapy compared with standard 3-weekly treatment among patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. All ICON8 patients were eligible to take part in the accompanying health-related quality-of-life study, which measured the effect of treatment on self-reported wellbeing, reported here.
METHODS
In this open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3, three-arm, Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) trial done at 117 hospital sites in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, South Korea, and Republic of Ireland, women (aged at least 18 years) with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IC-IV ovarian cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were randomly assigned (1:1:1) centrally using minimisation to group 1 (intravenous carboplatin area under the curve [AUC]5 or AUC6 and 175 mg/m
FINDINGS
Between June 6, 2011, and Nov 28, 2014, 1566 patients were recruited into ICON8 (522 were included in group 1, 523 in group 2, and 521 in group 3). Baseline quality-of-life questionnaires were completed by 1438 (92%) of 1566 patients and 9-month questionnaires by 882 (69%) of 1280 patients. We observed no significant difference in global health score at 9 months (cross-sectional analysis) between study groups (group 2 vs group 1, difference in mean score 2·3, 95% CI -0·4 to 4·9, p=0·095; group 3 vs group 1, -0·8, -3·8 to 2·2, p=0·61). Using longitudinal analysis, we found lower global health scores for those receiving weekly paclitaxel than for those receiving 3-weekly chemotherapy (group 2 vs group 1, mean difference -1·8, 95% CI -3·6 to -0·1, p=0·043; group 3 vs group 1, -2·9, -4·7 to -1·1, p=0·0018).
INTERPRETATION
We found no evidence of a difference in global quality of life between treatment groups at 9 months; however, patients receiving weekly treatment reported lower mean quality of life across the 9-month period after randomisation. Taken together with the lack of progression-free survival benefit, these findings do not support routine use of weekly paclitaxel-containing regimens in the management of newly diagnosed ovarian cancer.
FUNDING
Cancer Research UK, Medical Research Council, Health Research Board Ireland, Irish Cancer Society, and Cancer Australia.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32615110
pii: S1470-2045(20)30218-7
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30218-7
pmc: PMC7327508
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Carboplatin BG3F62OND5
Paclitaxel P88XT4IS4D

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01654146']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

969-977

Subventions

Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 12127
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12023/20
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12023/25
Pays : United Kingdom

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Références

N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 25;374(8):738-48
pubmed: 26933849
Lancet. 2009 Oct 17;374(9698):1331-8
pubmed: 19767092
Ann Oncol. 2014 Jan;25(1):251-7
pubmed: 24356636
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Jul;48(11):1713-21
pubmed: 22418017
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Mar 15;2:14
pubmed: 15023229
Eur J Cancer. 2003 Jul;39(10):1402-8
pubmed: 12826043
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jan;11(1):75-84
pubmed: 20129130
Clin Trials. 2018 Dec;15(6):624-630
pubmed: 30141714
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):139-44
pubmed: 9440735
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76
pubmed: 8433390
Lancet. 2019 Dec 7;394(10214):2084-2095
pubmed: 31791688
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Apr;15(4):396-405
pubmed: 24582486
Drug Metab Rev. 2016 Nov;48(4):502-540
pubmed: 27546072
J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Apr;50(4):441-50
pubmed: 9179103

Auteurs

Sarah P Blagden (SP)

Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: sarah.blagden@oncology.ox.ac.uk.

Adrian D Cook (AD)

Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.

Christopher Poole (C)

Department of Oncology, University Hospital Coventry, Coventry, UK.

Lesley Howells (L)

Maggie Keswick Jencks Cancer Caring Centres Trust, London, UK.

Ian A McNeish (IA)

Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Andrew Dean (A)

Oncology Department, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.

Jae-Weon Kim (JW)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

Dearbhaile M O'Donnell (DM)

Gynaecology Subgroup, Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Jane Hook (J)

St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.

Elizabeth C James (EC)

Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.

Ian R White (IR)

Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.

Timothy Perren (T)

St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.

Rosemary Lord (R)

Department of Oncology, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Birkenhead, UK.

Graham Dark (G)

Department of Oncology, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.

Helena M Earl (HM)

NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK.

Marcia Hall (M)

Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.

Richard Kaplan (R)

Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.

Jonathan A Ledermann (JA)

UCL Cancer Centre Institute, University College London, London, UK; University College Hospital, London, UK.

Andrew R Clamp (AR)

Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH