Wellness project implementation within Houston's Faith and Diabetes initiative: a mixed methods study.


Journal

BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Jul 2020
Historique:
received: 13 11 2019
accepted: 24 06 2020
entrez: 4 7 2020
pubmed: 4 7 2020
medline: 29 10 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Faith-based health promotion has shown promise for supporting healthy lifestyles, but has limited evidence of reaching scale or sustainability. In one recent such effort, volunteers from a diverse range of faith organizations were trained as peer educators to implement diabetes self-management education (DSME) classes within their communities. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with provision of these classes within six months of peer-educator training. This study used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify patterns from interviews, observations, attendance records, and organizational background information. Two research team members thematically coded interview transcripts and observation memos to identify patterns distinguishing faith organizations that did, versus did not, conduct DSME classes within six months of peer-educator training. Bivariate statistics were also used to identify faith organizational characteristics associated with DSME class completion within this time frame. Volunteers from 24 faith organizations received peer-educator training. Of these, 15 led a DSME class within six months, graduating a total of 132 participants. Thematic analyses yielded two challenges experienced disproportionately by organizations unable to complete DSME within six months: [1] Their peer educators experienced DSME as complex, despite substantial planning efforts at simplification, and [2] the process of engaging peer educators and leadership within their organizations was often more difficult than anticipated, despite initial communication by Faith and Diabetes organizers intended to secure informed commitments by both groups. Many peer educators were overwhelmed by training content, the responsibility required to start and sustain DSME classes, and other time commitments. Other priorities competed for time in participants' lives and on organizational calendars, and scheduling processes could be slow. In an apparent dynamic of "crowding out," coordination was particularly difficult in larger organizations, which were less likely than smaller organizations to complete DSME classes despite their more substantial resources. Initial commitment from faith organizations' leadership and volunteers may not suffice to implement even relatively short and low cost health promotion programs. Faith organizations might benefit from realistic previews about just how challenging it is to make these programs a sufficiently high organizational and individual priority.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Faith-based health promotion has shown promise for supporting healthy lifestyles, but has limited evidence of reaching scale or sustainability. In one recent such effort, volunteers from a diverse range of faith organizations were trained as peer educators to implement diabetes self-management education (DSME) classes within their communities. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with provision of these classes within six months of peer-educator training.
METHODS METHODS
This study used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify patterns from interviews, observations, attendance records, and organizational background information. Two research team members thematically coded interview transcripts and observation memos to identify patterns distinguishing faith organizations that did, versus did not, conduct DSME classes within six months of peer-educator training. Bivariate statistics were also used to identify faith organizational characteristics associated with DSME class completion within this time frame.
RESULTS RESULTS
Volunteers from 24 faith organizations received peer-educator training. Of these, 15 led a DSME class within six months, graduating a total of 132 participants. Thematic analyses yielded two challenges experienced disproportionately by organizations unable to complete DSME within six months: [1] Their peer educators experienced DSME as complex, despite substantial planning efforts at simplification, and [2] the process of engaging peer educators and leadership within their organizations was often more difficult than anticipated, despite initial communication by Faith and Diabetes organizers intended to secure informed commitments by both groups. Many peer educators were overwhelmed by training content, the responsibility required to start and sustain DSME classes, and other time commitments. Other priorities competed for time in participants' lives and on organizational calendars, and scheduling processes could be slow. In an apparent dynamic of "crowding out," coordination was particularly difficult in larger organizations, which were less likely than smaller organizations to complete DSME classes despite their more substantial resources.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Initial commitment from faith organizations' leadership and volunteers may not suffice to implement even relatively short and low cost health promotion programs. Faith organizations might benefit from realistic previews about just how challenging it is to make these programs a sufficiently high organizational and individual priority.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32615957
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09167-6
pii: 10.1186/s12889-020-09167-6
pmc: PMC7331178
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1050

Subventions

Organisme : Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
ID : 74155

Références

Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:213-34
pubmed: 17155879
Am J Public Health. 2004 Jun;94(6):1030-6
pubmed: 15249311
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Sep;99(3):1205-13
pubmed: 16103523
Ann Behav Med. 2003 Aug;26(1):1-7
pubmed: 12867348
J Relig Health. 2016 Dec;55(6):1891-906
pubmed: 26541338
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Feb;21 Suppl 2:S25-9
pubmed: 16637957
Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581-629
pubmed: 15595944
J Ambul Care Manage. 2012 Jan-Mar;35(1):15-26
pubmed: 22156952
Diabet Med. 2009 Jan;26(1):40-4
pubmed: 19125759
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 09;15:147
pubmed: 25889628
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 Jan-Feb;14(1):29-32
pubmed: 18091037
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014 Nov 21;63(46):1045-9
pubmed: 25412060
Endocr Pract. 2018 Jan;24(1):91-120
pubmed: 29368965
Lancet. 2009 Nov 14;374(9702):1677-86
pubmed: 19878986
Diabetes Educ. 2007 Jun;33 Suppl 6:151S-158S
pubmed: 17620395
Am J Health Behav. 2010 Sep-Oct;34(5):607-17
pubmed: 20524890
Fam Community Health. 2016 Oct-Dec;39(4):225-33
pubmed: 27536927
Diabet Med. 2004 Feb;21(2):122-8
pubmed: 14984446
Diabetes Educ. 2017 Oct;43(5):441-448
pubmed: 28793835
Milbank Q. 2014 Dec;92(4):725-53
pubmed: 25492602
Eval Program Plann. 2018 Jun;68:19-33
pubmed: 29459228
Patient Educ Couns. 2002 Oct -Nov;48(2):177-87
pubmed: 12401421
Popul Health Manag. 2012 Jun;15(3):144-8
pubmed: 22313442
ISRN Psychiatry. 2012 Dec 16;2012:278730
pubmed: 23762764
Health Educ Res. 2013 Jun;28(3):392-404
pubmed: 23525780
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Nov;94(5):1324-32
pubmed: 21918222
Eval Program Plann. 2014 Apr;43:93-102
pubmed: 24394548
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2013 May 1;35(5):787-796
pubmed: 23976809
Implement Sci. 2014 Jan 10;9:7
pubmed: 24410955
Diabetes Care. 2014 Jun;37(6):1525-34
pubmed: 24722495
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Oct;55(4):497-505
pubmed: 30126668
J Relig Health. 2015 Oct;54(5):1747-59
pubmed: 25119627
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Oct;100(10):1957-1960
pubmed: 28545846
Health Educ Behav. 2010 Oct;37(5):665-79
pubmed: 20696884
Health Educ Behav. 2014 Apr;41(2):216-24
pubmed: 24195841
Psychol Health. 2009 Dec;24(10):1153-65
pubmed: 20204985
Behav Med. 2010 Oct-Dec;36(4):113-22
pubmed: 21186434
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 02;15(10):
pubmed: 30279369
Fam Community Health. 2013 Jul-Sep;36(3):204-14
pubmed: 23718956
J Community Health. 2018 Aug;43(4):694-704
pubmed: 29427128
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Jun - Jul;60(1):3-10
pubmed: 28089610
Health Educ Behav. 2019 Dec;46(6):1045-1072
pubmed: 31387404
Chronic Illn. 2012 Dec;8(4):252-64
pubmed: 22318208
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013 Sep-Oct;45(5):428-34
pubmed: 23769297
Health Educ Behav. 2015 Aug;42(4):530-8
pubmed: 25616412
Endocrine. 2014 Sep;47(1):107-16
pubmed: 24744219
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jun;54(6):776-785
pubmed: 29656913
J Community Psychol. 2015 Apr;43(4):484-501
pubmed: 26668443

Auteurs

Rebecca Wells (R)

Department of Management, Policy, and Community Health, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, USA. Rebecca.S.Wells@uth.tmc.edu.

Ellen D Breckenridge (ED)

Department of Management, Policy, and Community Health, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, USA.

Stephen H Linder (SH)

Institute for Health Policy, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH