Combining visual analytics and case-based reasoning for rupture risk assessment of intracranial aneurysms.
Case-based reasoning
Intracranial aneurysms
Rupture risk assessment
Visual analytics
Journal
International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery
ISSN: 1861-6429
Titre abrégé: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101499225
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
11
01
2020
accepted:
11
06
2020
pubmed:
6
7
2020
medline:
13
1
2021
entrez:
6
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Medical case-based reasoning solves problems by applying experience gained from the outcome of previous treatments of the same kind. Particularly for complex treatment decisions, for example, incidentally found intracranial aneurysms (IAs), it can support the medical expert. IAs bear the risk of rupture and may lead to subarachnoidal hemorrhages. Treatment needs to be considered carefully, since it may entail unnecessary complications for IAs with low rupture risk. With a rupture risk prediction based on previous cases, the treatment decision can be supported. We present an interactive visual exploration tool for the case-based reasoning of IAs. In presence of a new aneurysm of interest, our application provides visual analytics techniques to identify the most similar cases with respect to morphology. The clinical expert can obtain the treatment, including the treatment outcome, for these cases and transfer it to the aneurysm of interest. Our application comprises a heatmap visualization, an adapted scatterplot matrix and fully or partially directed graphs with a circle- or force-directed layout to guide the interactive selection process. To fit the demands of clinical applications, we further integrated an interactive identification of outlier cases as well as an interactive attribute selection for the similarity calculation. A questionnaire evaluation with six trained physicians was used. Our application allows for case-based reasoning of IAs based on a reference data set. Three classifiers summarize the rupture state of the most similar cases. Medical experts positively evaluated the application. Our case-based reasoning application combined with visual analytic techniques allows for representation of similar IAs to support the clinician. The graphical representation was rated very useful and provides visual information of the similarity of the k most similar cases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32623613
doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02217-9
pii: 10.1007/s11548-020-02217-9
pmc: PMC7420879
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1525-1535Subventions
Organisme : German Research Foundation
ID : SA 3461/2-1
Organisme : Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
ID : 13GW0095A
Références
Aamodt A, Plaza E (1994) Case-based reasoning: foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Commun 7:39–59
doi: 10.3233/AIC-1994-7104
Aneurisk-Team (2012) AneuriskWeb project website. http://ecm2.mathcs.emory.edu/aneuriskweb . Accessed 2 Mar 2020
Benamina M, Atmani B, Benbelkacem S (2018) Diabetes diagnosis by case-based reasoning and fuzzy logic. Int J Interact Multimed Artif Intell 5(3):72–80. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2018.02.001
doi: 10.9781/ijimai.2018.02.001
Berg P, Voß S, Janiga G, Saalfeld S, Bergersen AW, Valen-Sendstad K, Bruening J, Goubergrits L, Spuler A, Chiu TL, Tsang ACO, Copelli G, Csippa B, Paál G, Závodszky G, Detmer FJ, Chung BJ, Cebral JR, Fujimura S, Takao H, Karmonik C, Elias S, Cancelliere NM, Najafi M, Steinman DA, Pereira VM, Piskin S, Finol EA, Pravdivtseva M, Velvaluri P, Rajabzadeh-Oghaz H, Paliwal N, Meng H, Seshadhri S, Venguru S, Shojima M, Sindeev S, Frolov S, Qian Y, Wu YA, Carlson KD, Kallmes DF, Dragomir-Daescu D, Beuing O (2019) Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH)—phase II: rupture risk assessment. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 14(10):1795–1804
pubmed: 31054128
doi: 10.1007/s11548-019-01986-2
Blanco X, Rodríguez S, Corchado JM, Zato C (2013) Case-based reasoning applied to medical diagnosis and treatment. In: Omatu S, Neves J, Rodriguez JMC, Paz Santana JF, Gonzalez SR (eds) Proc. of distributed computing and artificial intelligence. Springer, Cham, pp 137–146
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-00551-5_17
Bryant SM (1997) A case-based reasoning approach to bankruptcy prediction modeling. Intell Syst Account Financ Manag 6(3):195–214
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1174(199709)6:3<195::AID-ISAF132>3.0.CO;2-F
Chien A, Sayre J, Viñuela F (2011) Comparative morphological analysis of the geometry of ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Neurosurgery 69(2):349–356
pubmed: 21415785
doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31821661c3
Chuang CL (2011) Case-based reasoning support for liver disease diagnosis. Artif Intell Med 53(1):15–23
pubmed: 21757326
doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2011.06.002
Detmer F, Fajardo-Jiménez D, Mut Fea (2018) External validation of cerebral aneurysm rupture probability model with data from two patient cohorts. Acta Neurochir 160:2425–2434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3712-8
pubmed: 30374656
doi: 10.1007/s00701-018-3712-8
Detmer FJ, Chung BJ, Mut F, Slawski M, Hamzei-Sichani F, Putman C, Jiménez C, Cebral JR (2018) Development and internal validation of an aneurysm rupture probability model based on patient characteristics and aneurysm location, morphology, and hemodynamics. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 13(11):1767–1779
pubmed: 30094777
pmcid: 6328054
doi: 10.1007/s11548-018-1837-0
Detmer FJ, Hadad S, Chung B, Mut F, Slawski M, Juchler N, Kurtcuoglu V, Hirsch S, Bijlenga P, Uchiyama Y, Fujimura S, Yamamoto M, Murayama Y, Takao H, Koivisto T, Frösen J, Cebral JR (2019) Extending statistical learning for aneurysm rupture assessment to Finnish and Japanese populations using morphology, hemodynamics, and patient characteristics. Neurosurg Focus 47(1):E16. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.4.FOCUS19145
pubmed: 31261120
pmcid: 7132362
doi: 10.3171/2019.4.FOCUS19145
Dhar S, Tremmel M, Mocco J, Kim M, Yamamoto J, Siddiqui AH, Hopkins LN, Meng H (2008) Morphology parameters for intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment. Neurosurgery 63(2):185–196
pubmed: 18797347
pmcid: 18797347
doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000316847.64140.81
Holt A, Perner P, Bichindaritz I (2005) Medical applications in case-based reasoning. Knowl Eng Rev 20:1–24
doi: 10.1017/S0269888906000622
Ishibashi T, Murayama Y, Urashima M, Saguchi T, Ebara M, Arakawa H, Irie K, Takao H, Abe T (2008) Unruptured intracranial aneurysms-incidence of rupture and risk factors. Stroke 40(1):313–316. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.521674
pubmed: 18845802
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.521674
Kobashi S, Kondo K, Hata Y (2006) Computer-aided diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms in mra images with case-based reasoning. IEICE Trans Inf Syst 89:340–350. https://doi.org/10.1093/ietisy/e89-d.1.340
doi: 10.1093/ietisy/e89-d.1.340
Ma B, Harbaugh RE, Raghavan ML (2004) Three-dimensional geometrical characterization of cerebral aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng 32(2):264–273
pubmed: 15008374
doi: 10.1023/B:ABME.0000012746.31343.92
Niemann U, Berg P, Niemann A, Beuing O, Preim B, Spiliopoulou M, Saalfeld S (2018) Rupture status classification of intracranial aneurysms using morphological parameters. In: Proc of IEEE symposium on computer-based medical systems, pp 48– 53
Ochoa A, Hernandez A, Ponce J, Herrera AM (2016) Case-based reasoning for diagnosis heart failure. Austin Cardiol 1(1):1005
Saalfeld S, Berg P, Niemann A, Luz M, Preim B, Beuing O (2018) Semiautomatic neck curve reconstruction for intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment based on morphological parameters. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 13(11):1781–1793
pubmed: 30159832
doi: 10.1007/s11548-018-1848-x