Efficacy of Pidotimod use in treating allergic rhinitis in a pediatric population.


Journal

Italian journal of pediatrics
ISSN: 1824-7288
Titre abrégé: Ital J Pediatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101510759

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Jul 2020
Historique:
received: 10 03 2020
accepted: 29 06 2020
entrez: 9 7 2020
pubmed: 9 7 2020
medline: 16 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Allergic rhinitis (AR) and adenoidal hypertrophy (AH) are the most frequent causative disorders of nasal obstruction in children, leading to recurrent respiratory infections. Both nasal cavities are colonized by a stable microbial community susceptible to environmental changes and Staphylococcus aureus seems to play the major role. Furthermore, nasal microbiota holds a large number and variety of viruses with upper respiratory tract infections. This local microbiota deserves attention because its modification could induce a virtuous cross-talking with the immune system, with a better clearance of pathogens. Although AR and AH present a different etiopathogenesis, they have in common a minimal chronic inflammation surrounding nasal obstruction; hence it would be challenging to evaluate the effect of an immunomodulator on this minimal chronic inflammation with possible clinical and microbiological effects. The aim of this study is therefore to evaluate the efficacy of an immunomoldulator (Pidotimod) on nasal obstruction in children with AR and/or AH and whether its action involves a variation of nasal microbiota. We enrolled 76 children: those with allergic rhinitis (AR) sensitized to dust mites entered the AR group, those with adenoidal hypertrophy (AH) the AH group, those with both conditions the AR/AH group and those without AR ± AH as controls (CTRL). At the first visit they performed: skin prick tests, nasal fiberoptic endoscopy, anterior rhinomanometry, nasal swabs. Children with. AR ± AH started treatment with Pidotimod. After 1 month they were re-evaluated performing the same procedures. The primary outcome was the evaluation of nasal obstruction after treatment and the secondary outcome was the improvement of symptoms and the changes in nasal microflora. All patients improved their mean nasal flow (mNF) in respect to the baseline. In AR children mNF reached that one of CTRL. In AH children±AR the mNF was lower in respect to CTRL and AR group. We did not find any differences among all the groups at the two different time points in nasal microflora. Pidotimod is able to give an improvement in nasal obstruction, especially in AR children but this effect seems to be not mediated by changes in nasal microbiota.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Allergic rhinitis (AR) and adenoidal hypertrophy (AH) are the most frequent causative disorders of nasal obstruction in children, leading to recurrent respiratory infections. Both nasal cavities are colonized by a stable microbial community susceptible to environmental changes and Staphylococcus aureus seems to play the major role. Furthermore, nasal microbiota holds a large number and variety of viruses with upper respiratory tract infections. This local microbiota deserves attention because its modification could induce a virtuous cross-talking with the immune system, with a better clearance of pathogens. Although AR and AH present a different etiopathogenesis, they have in common a minimal chronic inflammation surrounding nasal obstruction; hence it would be challenging to evaluate the effect of an immunomodulator on this minimal chronic inflammation with possible clinical and microbiological effects. The aim of this study is therefore to evaluate the efficacy of an immunomoldulator (Pidotimod) on nasal obstruction in children with AR and/or AH and whether its action involves a variation of nasal microbiota.
METHODS METHODS
We enrolled 76 children: those with allergic rhinitis (AR) sensitized to dust mites entered the AR group, those with adenoidal hypertrophy (AH) the AH group, those with both conditions the AR/AH group and those without AR ± AH as controls (CTRL). At the first visit they performed: skin prick tests, nasal fiberoptic endoscopy, anterior rhinomanometry, nasal swabs. Children with. AR ± AH started treatment with Pidotimod. After 1 month they were re-evaluated performing the same procedures. The primary outcome was the evaluation of nasal obstruction after treatment and the secondary outcome was the improvement of symptoms and the changes in nasal microflora.
RESULTS RESULTS
All patients improved their mean nasal flow (mNF) in respect to the baseline. In AR children mNF reached that one of CTRL. In AH children±AR the mNF was lower in respect to CTRL and AR group. We did not find any differences among all the groups at the two different time points in nasal microflora.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Pidotimod is able to give an improvement in nasal obstruction, especially in AR children but this effect seems to be not mediated by changes in nasal microbiota.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32635938
doi: 10.1186/s13052-020-00859-8
pii: 10.1186/s13052-020-00859-8
pmc: PMC7341603
doi:

Substances chimiques

Immunologic Factors 0
Thiazolidines 0
pidotimod 785363R681
Pyrrolidonecarboxylic Acid SZB83O1W42

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

93

Références

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Jul;142(1):287-290.e4
pubmed: 29452201
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2013 Jan-Mar;27(1):253-8
pubmed: 23489705
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jan;271(1):103-7
pubmed: 23591798
Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 May;31(5):939-41
pubmed: 25753228
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2008 Oct;43(10):1020-4
pubmed: 18785259
Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Mar;31(3):391-6
pubmed: 25629793
Cell Host Microbe. 2015 May 13;17(5):704-15
pubmed: 25865368
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2002 Mar;33(3):174-80
pubmed: 11836796
Pharmacol Res. 2015 Jul;97:79-83
pubmed: 25931316
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2019 Feb 22;19(2):13
pubmed: 30793232
Clin Mol Allergy. 2015 May 21;13(1):8
pubmed: 25999796
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2018 Aug;14(8):645-647
pubmed: 29999434
Ital J Pediatr. 2013 May 10;39:29
pubmed: 23663325
Allergy. 2013;68(5):580-4
pubmed: 23409759
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2014 Oct-Dec;28(4):753-66
pubmed: 25620184
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Oct;140(4):950-958
pubmed: 28602936
J Transl Med. 2015 Sep 03;13:288
pubmed: 26335787
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46803
pubmed: 23071640
Rhinology. 1984 Sep;22(3):151-5
pubmed: 6505516
Eur Respir J. 2014 Feb;43(2):343-73
pubmed: 24337046
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2014 Jul-Aug;28(4):281-6
pubmed: 25197913
Int Immunopharmacol. 2009 Nov;9(12):1366-73
pubmed: 19712757
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 May;141(5):1949-1952.e8
pubmed: 29425849
Ital J Pediatr. 2013 Dec 06;39:75
pubmed: 24314100
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(51):e13783
pubmed: 30572534
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015 Jan-Feb;29(1):54-6
pubmed: 25590321
Rhinology. 2016 Jun;54(2):164-9
pubmed: 26874896
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017 Jun;7(6):561-569
pubmed: 28481057
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003 Dec;67(12):1303-9
pubmed: 14643473
Sci Adv. 2015 Jun 05;1(5):e1400216
pubmed: 26601194
J Asthma. 2004;41(3):285-7
pubmed: 15260461

Auteurs

Giulia Brindisi (G)

Department of Pediatrics, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy. giulia.brindisi@gmail.com.

Anna Maria Zicari (AM)

Department of Pediatrics, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Laura Schiavi (L)

Department of Pediatrics, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Alessandra Gori (A)

Department of Pediatrics, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Maria Pia Conte (MP)

Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Microbiology Section, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Massimiliano Marazzato (M)

Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Microbiology Section, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Giovanna De Castro (G)

Department of Pediatrics, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Lucia Leonardi (L)

Department of Pediatrics, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Marzia Duse (M)

Department of Pediatrics, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH