Cerebrovascular reactivity in cerebral amyloid angiopathy, Alzheimer disease, and mild cognitive impairment.
Aged
Alzheimer Disease
/ physiopathology
Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy
/ physiopathology
Cerebrovascular Circulation
/ physiology
Cognitive Dysfunction
/ physiopathology
Cohort Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Echo-Planar Imaging
Evoked Potentials, Visual
/ physiology
Female
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Visual Cortex
/ physiopathology
Journal
Neurology
ISSN: 1526-632X
Titre abrégé: Neurology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401060
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 09 2020
08 09 2020
Historique:
received:
26
06
2019
accepted:
16
03
2020
pubmed:
10
7
2020
medline:
23
10
2020
entrez:
10
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess cerebrovascular reactivity in response to a visual task in participants with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), Alzheimer disease (AD), and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) using fMRI. This prospective cohort study included 40 patients with CAA, 22 with AD, 27 with MCI, and 25 healthy controls. Each participant underwent a visual fMRI task using a contrast-reversing checkerboard stimulus. Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were used to compare visual cortex neuronal activity in 83 participants. General linear models using least-squares means, adjusted for multiple comparisons with the Tukey test, were used to estimate mean blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal change during the task and VEP differences between groups. After adjustment for age and hypertension, estimated mean BOLD response amplitude was as follows: CAA 1.88% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.60%-2.15%), AD 2.26% (1.91%-2.61%), MCI 2.15% (1.84%-2.46%), and control 2.65% (2.29%-3.00%). Only patients with CAA differed from controls ( Mean visual BOLD response amplitude was lowest in participants with CAA compared to controls, without differences in VEP latencies and amplitudes. This suggests that the impaired visual BOLD response is due to reduced vascular reactivity in CAA. In contrast to participants with CAA, the visual BOLD response amplitude did not differ between those with AD or MCI and controls.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32641520
pii: WNL.0000000000010201
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010201
pmc: PMC7538216
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1333-e1340Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
Pays : Canada
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2020 American Academy of Neurology.
Références
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;76 Suppl 2:ii16-22
pubmed: 15961863
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):270-9
pubmed: 21514249
Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86
pubmed: 5349366
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;23(2):138-56
pubmed: 16612231
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 May 16;15:348-358
pubmed: 28560160
Neuroimage. 2001 Dec;14(6):1370-86
pubmed: 11707093
Ageing Res Rev. 2012 Apr;11(2):271-7
pubmed: 22226802
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014 Jun 11;6(3):33
pubmed: 24987468
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Feb;16(2):115-122
pubmed: 27989553
Neurobiol Aging. 2015 Jan;36(1):33-41
pubmed: 25146454
Neurology. 1993 Nov;43(11):2412-4
pubmed: 8232972
Ann Neurol. 1999 Apr;45(4):466-72
pubmed: 10211471
Neuroimage. 2011 Sep 15;58(2):579-87
pubmed: 21745581
Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Apr;14(4):535-562
pubmed: 29653606
Lancet Neurol. 2013 Aug;12(8):822-38
pubmed: 23867200
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015 Jun;24(6):1262-9
pubmed: 25906930
Ann Neurol. 2015 Feb;77(2):251-61
pubmed: 25428654
Stroke. 2016 Aug;47(8):2010-6
pubmed: 27338926
Int J Stroke. 2011 Aug;6(4):302-5
pubmed: 21609412
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Feb;63(2):276-81
pubmed: 25688603
Acta Neuropathol. 2009 Jul;118(1):87-102
pubmed: 19234858
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2019 Mar 18;6(4):795-806
pubmed: 31020004
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997 Sep 26;826:254-62
pubmed: 9329697
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Nov;17(3):143-55
pubmed: 12391568
Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1732-47
pubmed: 15050594
Transl Stroke Res. 2014 Jun;5(3):330-7
pubmed: 24323728
Neuroreport. 1999 Jun 23;10(9):1893-7
pubmed: 10501528
Neuroimage Clin. 2016 Mar 03;11:461-467
pubmed: 27104140
Arch Neurol. 1980 Jul;37(7):410-8
pubmed: 7387484
Neurology. 2010 Apr 27;74(17):1346-50
pubmed: 20421578
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):782-90
pubmed: 21979382
Neurology. 2013 Nov 5;81(19):1659-65
pubmed: 24097810
Ann Neurol. 2012 Jul;72(1):76-81
pubmed: 22829269
Stroke. 2008 Apr;39(4):1127-33
pubmed: 18292383
Neurology. 2001 Feb 27;56(4):537-9
pubmed: 11222803
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017 Oct;37(10):3433-3445
pubmed: 28145796
Neuroimage. 2002 Oct;17(2):825-41
pubmed: 12377157
Stroke. 2007 Dec;38(12):3186-92
pubmed: 17962592
Ann Neurol. 2000 Jan;47(1):93-100
pubmed: 10632106
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;74(1):44-50
pubmed: 12486265
Stroke. 2014 Jun;45(6):1815-21
pubmed: 24781082
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):263-9
pubmed: 21514250
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;65(2):651-657
pubmed: 30103317
Brain. 2007 Sep;130(Pt 9):2310-9
pubmed: 17638859
Funct Neurol. 2005 Jul-Sep;20(3):115-20
pubmed: 16324234