Tofogliflozin does not delay progression of carotid atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes: a prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparative study.
Aged
Benzhydryl Compounds
/ adverse effects
Carotid Artery Diseases
/ diagnostic imaging
Carotid Intima-Media Thickness
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
/ blood
Disease Progression
Female
Glucosides
/ adverse effects
Humans
Japan
/ epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
/ adverse effects
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Atherosclerosis
Diabetes
Intima-media thickness
SGLT2 inhibitor
Tofogliflozin
Journal
Cardiovascular diabetology
ISSN: 1475-2840
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Diabetol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147637
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 07 2020
09 07 2020
Historique:
received:
06
04
2020
accepted:
02
07
2020
entrez:
11
7
2020
pubmed:
11
7
2020
medline:
27
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to investigate the preventive effects of tofogliflozin, a selective sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, on atherosclerosis progression in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients without apparent cardiovascular disease (CVD) by monitoring carotid intima-media thickness (IMT). This prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint, multicenter, parallel-group, comparative study included 340 subjects with T2DM and no history of apparent CVD recruited at 24 clinical units. Subjects were randomly allocated to either the tofogliflozin treatment group (n = 169) or conventional treatment group using drugs other than SGLT2 inhibitors (n = 171). Primary outcomes were changes in mean and maximum common carotid IMT measured by echography during a 104-week treatment period. In a mixed-effects model for repeated measures, the mean IMT of the common carotid artery (mean-IMT-CCA), along with the right and left maximum IMT of the CCA (max-IMT-CCA), significantly declined in both the tofogliflozin (- 0.132 mm, SE 0.007; - 0.163 mm, SE 0.013; - 0.170 mm, SE 0.020, respectively) and the control group (- 0.140 mm, SE 0.006; - 0.190 mm, SE 0.012; - 0.190 mm, SE 0.020, respectively). Furthermore, the tofogliflozin and the conventional treatment group did not significantly differ in the progression of the mean-IMT-CCA (mean change (95% CI) 0.008 (- 0.009, 0.025) mm, P = 0.34), along with the right (mean change (95% CI) 0.027 (- 0.005, 0.059) mm, P = 0.10) and the left max-IMT-CCA (mean change (95% CI) 0.020 (- 0.030, 0.070), P = 0.43). Similar findings were obtained even after adjusting for traditional CV risk factors and/or administration of drugs at baseline. Relative to the control treatment effects, tofogliflozin significantly reduced the HbA1c, blood glucose level, body weight/body mass index, abdominal circumference, and systolic blood pressure, and significantly increased the HDL-C. The total and serious adverse events incidences did not significantly vary between the treatment groups. No IMT changes were observed between the tofogliflozin and the conventional treatment groups. However, tofogliflozin is a safe and effective treatment option for managing primary CVD risk factors in this population. Clinical Trial Registration UMIN000017607 ( https://www.umin.ac.jp/icdr/index.html ).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to investigate the preventive effects of tofogliflozin, a selective sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, on atherosclerosis progression in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients without apparent cardiovascular disease (CVD) by monitoring carotid intima-media thickness (IMT).
METHODS
This prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint, multicenter, parallel-group, comparative study included 340 subjects with T2DM and no history of apparent CVD recruited at 24 clinical units. Subjects were randomly allocated to either the tofogliflozin treatment group (n = 169) or conventional treatment group using drugs other than SGLT2 inhibitors (n = 171). Primary outcomes were changes in mean and maximum common carotid IMT measured by echography during a 104-week treatment period.
RESULTS
In a mixed-effects model for repeated measures, the mean IMT of the common carotid artery (mean-IMT-CCA), along with the right and left maximum IMT of the CCA (max-IMT-CCA), significantly declined in both the tofogliflozin (- 0.132 mm, SE 0.007; - 0.163 mm, SE 0.013; - 0.170 mm, SE 0.020, respectively) and the control group (- 0.140 mm, SE 0.006; - 0.190 mm, SE 0.012; - 0.190 mm, SE 0.020, respectively). Furthermore, the tofogliflozin and the conventional treatment group did not significantly differ in the progression of the mean-IMT-CCA (mean change (95% CI) 0.008 (- 0.009, 0.025) mm, P = 0.34), along with the right (mean change (95% CI) 0.027 (- 0.005, 0.059) mm, P = 0.10) and the left max-IMT-CCA (mean change (95% CI) 0.020 (- 0.030, 0.070), P = 0.43). Similar findings were obtained even after adjusting for traditional CV risk factors and/or administration of drugs at baseline. Relative to the control treatment effects, tofogliflozin significantly reduced the HbA1c, blood glucose level, body weight/body mass index, abdominal circumference, and systolic blood pressure, and significantly increased the HDL-C. The total and serious adverse events incidences did not significantly vary between the treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION
No IMT changes were observed between the tofogliflozin and the conventional treatment groups. However, tofogliflozin is a safe and effective treatment option for managing primary CVD risk factors in this population. Clinical Trial Registration UMIN000017607 ( https://www.umin.ac.jp/icdr/index.html ).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32646498
doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01079-4
pii: 10.1186/s12933-020-01079-4
pmc: PMC7350187
doi:
Substances chimiques
Benzhydryl Compounds
0
Glucosides
0
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
0
6-((4-ethylphenyl)methyl)-3',4',5',6'-tetrahydro-6'-(hydroxymethyl)spiro(isobenzofuran-1(3H),2'-(2H)pyran)-3',4',5'-triol
P8DD8KX4O4
Banques de données
UMIN-CTR
['UMIN000017607']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
110Références
J Diabetes Investig. 2020 Mar;11(2):400-404
pubmed: 31361403
Diabetes Care. 2013 Apr;36(4):894-900
pubmed: 23223349
J Diabetes Res. 2018 Jan 8;2018:6470137
pubmed: 29507863
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jun 1;7(11):
pubmed: 29858361
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Feb 15;304(4):E414-23
pubmed: 23249697
J Clin Med Res. 2020 Mar;12(3):165-171
pubmed: 32231752
Ann Intern Med. 1998 Feb 15;128(4):262-9
pubmed: 9471928
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Dec;5(12):951-964
pubmed: 29079252
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2004 Jun;64(3):225-8
pubmed: 15126012
Stroke. 2006 Sep;37(9):2420-7
pubmed: 16888250
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 21;12(3):e0173393
pubmed: 28323823
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2018 Oct 1;25(10):1053-1066
pubmed: 29445076
Am J Kidney Dis. 2009 Jun;53(6):982-92
pubmed: 19339088
Diabetes Ther. 2017 Oct;8(5):999-1013
pubmed: 28864997
Stroke. 2007 Nov;38(11):2887-94
pubmed: 17885257
Diabetes Care. 2016 Jan;39(1):139-48
pubmed: 26628419
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Aug 28;18(1):112
pubmed: 31462224
Am Heart J. 2010 Oct;160(4):701-14
pubmed: 20934565
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 24;380(4):347-357
pubmed: 30415602
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Apr 9;17(1):52
pubmed: 29631585
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014 Apr;15(6):749-66
pubmed: 24512053
Diabetes Care. 2016 May;39(5):717-25
pubmed: 27208375
Hypertens Res. 2008 Feb;31(2):271-9
pubmed: 18360047
Circulation. 2002 Oct 15;106(16):2055-60
pubmed: 12379573
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Jul 6;16(1):84
pubmed: 28683796
Am J Hypertens. 2006 Dec;19(12):1206-12
pubmed: 17161764
Circulation. 2007 Jan 30;115(4):459-67
pubmed: 17242284
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Jul 26;17(1):106
pubmed: 30049285
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):644-657
pubmed: 28605608
Diabetes Care. 2019 Oct;42(10):e159-e161
pubmed: 31533913
Circulation. 1998 May 12;97(18):1784-90
pubmed: 9603532
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014 Mar 28;13:65
pubmed: 24678906
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2117-28
pubmed: 26378978
J Intern Med. 2007 May;261(5):472-9
pubmed: 17444886
Circulation. 2016 Sep 6;134(10):752-72
pubmed: 27470878
Am Heart J. 2001 May;141(5):694-703
pubmed: 11320355
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Dec 7;56(24):2006-20
pubmed: 21126642
Diabetes Care. 2015 Feb;38(2):316-22
pubmed: 25492401
Endocr J. 2017 Oct 28;64(10):995-1005
pubmed: 28824042
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014 Oct 26;13:148
pubmed: 25344694
Lancet. 2012 Jun 2;379(9831):2053-62
pubmed: 22541275
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Aug 20;159(4):262-74
pubmed: 24026259
Diabetes Care. 2011 May;34 Suppl 2:S132-7
pubmed: 21525444
Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2005 Mar 10;6(1):3
pubmed: 15760471
Diabetologia. 2016 Jul;59(7):1333-1339
pubmed: 27112340
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2012 Jun;341(3):692-701
pubmed: 22410641
Endocr J. 2018 Aug 27;65(8):859-867
pubmed: 29806620
Diabetes Care. 2015 Oct;38(10):1921-9
pubmed: 26180107
Diabetes Care. 2016 Mar;39(3):455-64
pubmed: 26822324
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 12;13(4):e0191172
pubmed: 29649236
Diabetologia. 2017 Feb;60(2):364-376
pubmed: 27866224
Diabetologia. 2004 Nov;47(11):1906-13
pubmed: 15565373