The Ability of the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score to Predict Mobility, Length of Stay and Mortality in Hospital, and Discharge Destination in Patients Admitted with a Hip Fracture.
Geriatrics
Health economics
Two-graph ROC analysis
Journal
Calcified tissue international
ISSN: 1432-0827
Titre abrégé: Calcif Tissue Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7905481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
received:
25
05
2020
accepted:
02
07
2020
pubmed:
13
7
2020
medline:
15
7
2021
entrez:
13
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) has been developed for predicting 30-day and 1-year mortality after hip fracture. We hypothesise that NHFS may also predict other adverse events. Data from 666 patients (190 men, 476 women), aged 60.2-103.4 years, admitted with a hip fracture to a single centre from 1/10/2015 and 7/12/2017 were analysed. The ability of NHFS to predict mobility within 1 day after surgery, length of stay (LOS) find mortality, and discharge destination was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curves and two-graph plots. The area under the curve (95% confidence interval [CI]) for predicting mortality was 67.4% (58.4-76.4%), prolonged LOS was 59.0% (54.0-64.0%), discharge to residential/nursing care was 62.3% (54.0-71.5%), and any two of failure to mobilise, prolonged LOS or discharge to residential/nursing care was 64.8% (59.0-70.6%). NHFS thresholds at 4 and 7 corresponding to the lower and upper limits of intermediate range where sensitivity and specificity equal 90% were identified for mortality and prolonged LOS, and 4 and 6 for discharge to residential/nursing care, which were used to create three risk categories. Compared with the low risk group (NHFS = 0-4), the high risk group (NHFS = 7-10 or 6-10) had increased risk of in-patient mortality: rates = 2.0% versus 7.1%, OR (95% CI) = 3.8 (1.5-9.9), failure to mobilise within 1 day of surgery: rates = 18.9% versus 28.3%, OR = 1.7 (1.0-2.8), prolonged LOS (> 17 days): rates = 20.3% versus 33.9%, OR = 2.2 (1.3-3.3), discharge to residential/nursing care: rates = 4.5% vs 12.3%, OR = 3.0 (1.4-6.4), and any two of failure to mobilise, prolonged LOS or discharge to residential/nursing care: rates = 10.5% versus 28.6%, 3.4 (95% CI 1.9-6.0), and stayed 4.1 days (1.5-6.7 days) longer in hospital. High NHFS associates with increased risk of mortality, prolonged LOS and discharge to residential/nursing care, lending further support for its use to identify adverse events.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32653943
doi: 10.1007/s00223-020-00722-2
pii: 10.1007/s00223-020-00722-2
pmc: PMC7497295
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
319-326Références
Injury. 2018 Aug;49(8):1458-1460
pubmed: 29699731
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019 Jul;31(7):993-999
pubmed: 30191455
Neurol Sci. 2019 Aug;40(8):1659-1665
pubmed: 31030369
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016 Oct;42(5):565-569
pubmed: 27241865
Age Ageing. 2020 Apr 27;49(3):411-417
pubmed: 31813951
J Immunol Methods. 1995 Sep 11;185(1):123-32
pubmed: 7665894
Lancet Public Health. 2017 May;2(5):e239-e246
pubmed: 29253489
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Apr;106(4):501-4
pubmed: 21278153
Bone Joint J. 2015 Jan;97-B(1):100-3
pubmed: 25568421
Injury. 2016 Oct;47(10):2138-2143
pubmed: 27469403
Circulation. 2007 Feb 6;115(5):654-7
pubmed: 17283280
Br J Anaesth. 2012 Oct;109(4):546-50
pubmed: 22728204
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Jan 08;11:4
pubmed: 26746904
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Apr 23;:
pubmed: 29687439
Obes Res. 1996 Nov;4(6):533-47
pubmed: 8946438
J Bone Miner Res. 2015 Apr;30(4):637-46
pubmed: 25359586
Age Ageing. 2012 May;41(3):322-6
pubmed: 22083839
Injury. 2019 Apr;50(4):931-938
pubmed: 30902424
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Oct;101(4):511-7
pubmed: 18723517