The impact of global selection on local adaptation and reproductive isolation.
divergent selection
ecological speciation
gene flow
local adaptation
reproductive isolation
Journal
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences
ISSN: 1471-2970
Titre abrégé: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7503623
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 08 2020
31 08 2020
Historique:
entrez:
14
7
2020
pubmed:
14
7
2020
medline:
21
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite the homogenizing effect of strong gene flow between two populations, adaptation under symmetric divergent selection pressures results in partial reproductive isolation: adaptive substitutions act as local barriers to gene flow, and if divergent selection continues unimpeded, this will result in complete reproductive isolation of the two populations, i.e. speciation. However, a key issue in framing the process of speciation as a tension between local adaptation and the homogenizing force of gene flow is that the mutation process is blind to changes in the environment and therefore tends to limit adaptation. Here we investigate how globally beneficial mutations (GBMs) affect divergent local adaptation and reproductive isolation. When phenotypic divergence is finite, we show that the presence of GBMs limits local adaptation, generating a persistent genetic load at the loci that contribute to the trait under divergent selection and reducing genome-wide divergence. Furthermore, we show that while GBMs cannot prohibit the process of continuous differentiation, they induce a substantial delay in the genome-wide shutdown of gene flow. This article is part of the theme issue 'Towards the completion of speciation: the evolution of reproductive isolation beyond the first barriers'.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32654652
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0531
pmc: PMC7423272
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5018474']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20190531Références
Evolution. 2013 Sep;67(9):2577-91
pubmed: 24033168
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Dec 19;372(1736):
pubmed: 29109219
Mol Biol Evol. 2019 Mar 1;36(3):632-637
pubmed: 30517680
Genetics. 1997 Feb;145(2):493-504
pubmed: 9071602
Mol Ecol. 2008 Jan;17(1):30-44
pubmed: 18034800
Evolution. 2011 Jul;65(7):1897-911
pubmed: 21729046
Evolution. 2020 Jan;74(1):4-14
pubmed: 31721186
Evolution. 1998 Aug;52(4):935-949
pubmed: 28565213
Genet Res. 1966 Dec;8(3):269-94
pubmed: 5980116
Evolution. 2016 Jul;70(7):1450-64
pubmed: 27252049
PLoS Genet. 2020 Jun 18;16(6):e1008867
pubmed: 32555579
J Math Biol. 2015 Jun;70(7):1523-80
pubmed: 24992884
Science. 2019 Nov 1;366(6465):594-599
pubmed: 31672890
Evolution. 2011 Sep;65(9):2421-34
pubmed: 21884046
Heredity (Edinb). 2017 Jan;118(1):96-109
pubmed: 27901509
Heredity (Edinb). 1986 Dec;57 ( Pt 3):357-76
pubmed: 3804765
Science. 2003 Apr 11;300(5617):321-4
pubmed: 12690198
Mol Ecol. 2014 Jul;23(13):3133-57
pubmed: 24845075
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 13;114(24):E4762-E4771
pubmed: 28559322
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Nov 1;14(11):e1006581
pubmed: 30383757
Trends Genet. 2016 Jul;32(7):408-418
pubmed: 27185237
Genome Res. 2009 Jul;19(7):1195-201
pubmed: 19439516
Bioessays. 2000 Dec;22(12):1075-84
pubmed: 11084623
Nat Rev Genet. 2015 Jun;16(6):359-71
pubmed: 25963373
Evolution. 2016 Jul;70(7):1609-21
pubmed: 27196373
Genetics. 2016 Feb;202(2):775-86
pubmed: 26715666
Mol Biol Evol. 1998 May;15(5):538-43
pubmed: 9580982
Evolution. 1981 Jan;35(1):124-138
pubmed: 28563447
Genetics. 2011 Dec;189(4):1427-37
pubmed: 21954160
Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 Jul;10(7):294-9
pubmed: 21237047
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 3;114(27):7061-7066
pubmed: 28634295
Evolution. 1983 May;37(3):454-471
pubmed: 28563316