Large variability in feeding behavior among crossbred growing cattle.
correlation
dominance
feed efficiency
repeatability
Journal
Journal of animal science
ISSN: 1525-3163
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003002
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jul 2020
01 Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
08
04
2020
accepted:
09
07
2020
pubmed:
14
7
2020
medline:
28
11
2020
entrez:
14
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to define an extensive suite of feeding behavior traits in growing crossbred cattle and to investigate their phenotypic inter-relationships as well as relationships with other performance and efficiency traits. Time-series feeding behavior data, as well as feed intake and liveweight records, were available for 624 growing crossbred cattle, of which 445 were steers and 179 were heifers. Feeding behavior repeatability estimates were calculated using linear mixed models. Additionally, partial Spearman correlations were estimated among 14 feeding behavior traits, as well as between feeding behavior with both performance and feed efficiency traits, using residuals retained from linear mixed models. The marginal contribution of several feeding behavior traits to the variability in metabolizable energy intake (MEI) was also determined. Repeatability estimates of 0.57, 0.36, and 0.48 were calculated for the number of feed events per day, the total time spent feeding per day, and the feeding rate, respectively. Cattle that ate more frequently each day, ate at a faster rate and consumed less energy in each visit to the feed bunk. More efficient cattle fed less often per day and fed for a shorter duration per day; they also had a slower feeding rate and fed for longer in each visit to the feed bunk. Moreover, heavier cattle fed for a longer duration per day had a faster feeding rate, but fed less often per day; heavier animals also fed first in the pen after the fresh feed was offered. The number of feed events per day and feeding time per day together explained an additional 13.4 percentage points of the variability in MEI above that already explained by all of growth rate, liveweight, and backfat depth. The results from the present study suggest that several repeatable time-series-related feeding behavior traits, that are less resource intensive to measure, may have a role as useful predictor traits of important but relatively difficult to record traits, such as feed intake and efficiency.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32658252
pii: 5870661
doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa216
pmc: PMC7455305
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.
Références
Front Vet Sci. 2015 May 28;2:16
pubmed: 26664945
J Anim Sci. 2007 Oct;85(10):2382-90
pubmed: 17591713
J Theor Biol. 2001 Dec 7;213(3):413-25
pubmed: 11735288
J Anim Sci. 2019 Apr 29;97(5):2202-2219
pubmed: 30789654
Anim Behav. 1999 Apr;57(4):807-817
pubmed: 10202089
J Anim Sci. 2010 Oct;88(10):3214-25
pubmed: 20525931
J Anim Sci. 2011 Nov;89(11):3401-9
pubmed: 21642495
J Dairy Sci. 2003 Mar;86(3):1036-44
pubmed: 12703641
J Anim Sci. 2011 Apr;89(4):1180-92
pubmed: 21415425
J Anim Sci. 2019 Nov 4;97(11):4405-4417
pubmed: 31593986
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Apr;96(4):2654-2656
pubmed: 23462165
Br Poult Sci. 1989 Sep;30(3):533-44
pubmed: 2819497
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Nov;102(11):10056-10072
pubmed: 31495621
J Anim Sci. 2014 Aug;92(8):3580-90
pubmed: 24948647
J Anim Sci. 2009 Apr;87(14 Suppl):E64-71
pubmed: 19028857
J Anim Sci. 2012 Jan;90(1):109-15
pubmed: 21890504
Animal. 2018 Dec;12(12):2639-2648
pubmed: 29606168
J Anim Sci. 2019 Mar 1;97(3):1171-1184
pubmed: 30597005
J Anim Sci. 2009 Apr;87(4):1528-39
pubmed: 18997083
J Anim Sci. 1993 Oct;71(10):2815-25
pubmed: 8226385