How can you tell your nursing student has chosen the wrong vocation? An integrative literature review.


Journal

Nurse education today
ISSN: 1532-2793
Titre abrégé: Nurse Educ Today
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 8511379

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Historique:
received: 12 12 2019
revised: 18 05 2020
accepted: 30 06 2020
pubmed: 14 7 2020
medline: 23 3 2021
entrez: 14 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To synthesise existing evidence that identifies characteristics, behaviours or predictors of the struggling nursing student early on in their studies and the risk that this poses to vocational dissonance. An integrative literature review. A search of the online databases CINAHL Plus, Medline and PsychINFO was conducted. Using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, a systematic search across online databases was conducted for papers published between the years 2000 and 2018. Data were extracted using a standard proforma and evaluated for quality. Data were then categorised and compared until themes emerged that reflected the aim of this review. From a total of 3024 studies, 14 papers were included in the review. Overall, this review indicates that it is challenging to identify the struggling nursing student early on in their education. Thematic analysis of the included studies identified three key themes: 1) defining the undefinable, 2) red flag characteristics of the struggling student; and 3) the power imbalance of student and educator. There is limited evidence to define and describe the characteristics of the struggling nursing student. Future research should focus on describing and defining characteristics that are early markers of struggle and vocational dissonance.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32659537
pii: S0260-6917(19)31848-9
doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104528
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

104528

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest No conflict of interest has been declared by the authors.

Auteurs

Tallulah Browne (T)

Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, The University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland 1023, Private Bag 92019, New Zealand. Electronic address: tbro092@aucklanduni.ac.nz.

Julia Slark (J)

Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, The University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland 1023, Private Bag 92019, New Zealand. Electronic address: j.slark@auckland.ac.nz.

Kim Ward (K)

Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, The University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland 1023, Private Bag 92019, New Zealand. Electronic address: k.ward@auckland.ac.nz.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH