Feasibility of the Archercise biofeedback device to strengthen foot musculature.


Journal

Journal of foot and ankle research
ISSN: 1757-1146
Titre abrégé: J Foot Ankle Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101471610

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Jul 2020
Historique:
received: 17 11 2019
accepted: 19 05 2020
entrez: 15 7 2020
pubmed: 15 7 2020
medline: 28 4 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Foot muscle weakness can produce foot deformity, pain and disability. Toe flexor and foot arch exercises focused on intrinsic foot muscle strength and functional control may mitigate the progression of foot deformity and disability. Ensuring correct exercise technique is challenging due to the specificity of muscle activation required to complete some foot exercises. Biofeedback has been used to improve adherence, muscle activity and movement patterns. We investigated the feasibility of using a novel medical device, known as "Archercise", to provide real-time biofeedback of correct arch movement via pressure change in an inflatable bladder, and foot location adherence via sensors embedded in a footplate during four-foot exercises. Thirty adults (63% female, aged 23-68 years) performed four-foot exercises twice on the Archercise sensor footplate alone and then with biofeedback. One-way repeated measures ANOVA with pairwise comparisons were computed to assess the consistency of the exercise protocol between trial 1 and trial 2 (prior to biofeedback), and the effectiveness of the Archercise biofeedback device between trial 2 and trial 3 (with biofeedback). Outcome measures were: Arch movement exercises of arch elevation and lowering speed, controlled arch elevation, controlled arch lowering, endurance of arch elevation; Foot location adherence was determined by percentage of time the great toe, fifth toe and heel contacted footplate sensors during testing and were analysed with paired sample t-tests. Participant survey comments on the use of Archercise with biofeedback were reported thematically. Seventeen (89%) arch movement and foot location variables were collected consistently with Archercise during the foot exercises. Archercise with biofeedback improved foot location adherence for all exercises (p = 0.003-0.008), coefficient of determination for controlled arch elevation (p < 0.0001) and endurance area ratio (p = 0.001). Twenty-nine (97%) participants reported Archercise with biofeedback, helped correct exercise performance. Archercise is a feasible biofeedback device to assist healthy participants without foot pathologies perform foot doming exercises. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): 12616001559404. Registered 11 November 2016, http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/ACTRN12616001559404p.aspx.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Foot muscle weakness can produce foot deformity, pain and disability. Toe flexor and foot arch exercises focused on intrinsic foot muscle strength and functional control may mitigate the progression of foot deformity and disability. Ensuring correct exercise technique is challenging due to the specificity of muscle activation required to complete some foot exercises. Biofeedback has been used to improve adherence, muscle activity and movement patterns. We investigated the feasibility of using a novel medical device, known as "Archercise", to provide real-time biofeedback of correct arch movement via pressure change in an inflatable bladder, and foot location adherence via sensors embedded in a footplate during four-foot exercises.
METHODS METHODS
Thirty adults (63% female, aged 23-68 years) performed four-foot exercises twice on the Archercise sensor footplate alone and then with biofeedback. One-way repeated measures ANOVA with pairwise comparisons were computed to assess the consistency of the exercise protocol between trial 1 and trial 2 (prior to biofeedback), and the effectiveness of the Archercise biofeedback device between trial 2 and trial 3 (with biofeedback). Outcome measures were: Arch movement exercises of arch elevation and lowering speed, controlled arch elevation, controlled arch lowering, endurance of arch elevation; Foot location adherence was determined by percentage of time the great toe, fifth toe and heel contacted footplate sensors during testing and were analysed with paired sample t-tests. Participant survey comments on the use of Archercise with biofeedback were reported thematically.
RESULTS RESULTS
Seventeen (89%) arch movement and foot location variables were collected consistently with Archercise during the foot exercises. Archercise with biofeedback improved foot location adherence for all exercises (p = 0.003-0.008), coefficient of determination for controlled arch elevation (p < 0.0001) and endurance area ratio (p = 0.001). Twenty-nine (97%) participants reported Archercise with biofeedback, helped correct exercise performance.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Archercise is a feasible biofeedback device to assist healthy participants without foot pathologies perform foot doming exercises.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): 12616001559404. Registered 11 November 2016, http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/ACTRN12616001559404p.aspx.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32660591
doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-00394-z
pii: 10.1186/s13047-020-00394-z
pmc: PMC7359285
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

43

Références

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005 Dec;60(12):1546-52
pubmed: 16424286
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Jul 01;15:72
pubmed: 26126532
J Foot Ankle Res. 2011 Mar 14;4:10
pubmed: 21401957
Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Jan;36(1):37-45
pubmed: 25237175
J Foot Ankle Res. 2014 Nov 28;7(1):51
pubmed: 25493100
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Jan;29(1):
pubmed: 27440584
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63(11):1592-8
pubmed: 22034121
Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2014 Mar;210(3):642-54
pubmed: 24387247
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Jan;92(1):68-75
pubmed: 21187207
Man Ther. 2013 Oct;18(5):425-30
pubmed: 23632367
J Physiother. 2011;57(3):145-55
pubmed: 21843829
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Mar;49(5):290
pubmed: 24659509
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Physiotherapy. 2017 Mar;103(1):13-20
pubmed: 27986277
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008 Jun;18(3):420-5
pubmed: 17208458
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 Jan;21(1):89-98
pubmed: 16182419
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001 Sep;85(5):491-5
pubmed: 11606020
J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Aug;28(8):2241-4
pubmed: 27630405
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Aug 27;13(1):78
pubmed: 27568011
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Jul;59:130-41
pubmed: 24831923
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(2):163-8
pubmed: 23640317
Phys Ther. 2010 Aug;90(8):1123-34
pubmed: 20558567
Foot Ankle Int. 2007 May;28(5):617-20
pubmed: 17559771
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Nov;191(2):197-208
pubmed: 18670769
Sports Med. 2017 May;47(5):917-941
pubmed: 27647157
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Apr;91(4):1123S-1127S
pubmed: 20164314
Gait Posture. 2015 Jun;42(1):42-8
pubmed: 25819716
Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Jul;26(7):540-4
pubmed: 16045845
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Jan;67(1):80-8
pubmed: 24905860
J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 May;26(5):717-9
pubmed: 24926138
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Sep;31(9):2599-2608
pubmed: 28486337
J Sports Sci. 2013;31(4):424-33
pubmed: 23106289
BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 27;4(6):e005044
pubmed: 24972606
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012 Jan;27(1):46-51
pubmed: 21864955
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2011;24(4):225-31
pubmed: 22142711
J Neurophysiol. 2013 Aug;110(4):891-8
pubmed: 23678020
Qual Manag Health Care. 2008 Oct-Dec;17(4):280-91
pubmed: 19020398
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Jun;70(6):902-907
pubmed: 28834406
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010 Dec 09;7:58
pubmed: 21143921
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012 Jun;27(5):500-5
pubmed: 22166747
Gerontology. 2015;61(6):567-74
pubmed: 25721132
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 Jul;18(7):923-6
pubmed: 20417286
J Rheumatol. 2008 Feb;35(2):216-23
pubmed: 18085742
Behav Brain Res. 2001 Sep 14;123(2):133-41
pubmed: 11399326
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 May;82(5):345-9
pubmed: 12704272
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Feb 24;11:82
pubmed: 28286474
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013 Jun 18;10:60
pubmed: 23777436
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Jan 28;14:45
pubmed: 23356426
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009 Dec;24(10):787-91
pubmed: 19751956
J Med Syst. 2015 Nov;39(11):135
pubmed: 26319272

Auteurs

Penelope J Latey (PJ)

The University of Sydney, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Lidcombe, New South Wales, 2141, Australia. penny.latey@sydney.edu.au.

John Eisenhuth (J)

The University of Sydney, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Lidcombe, New South Wales, 2141, Australia.

Marnee J McKay (MJ)

The University of Sydney, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Lidcombe, New South Wales, 2141, Australia.

Claire E Hiller (CE)

The University of Sydney, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Lidcombe, New South Wales, 2141, Australia.

Premala Sureshkumar (P)

The University of Sydney, Concord Clinical School, Concord, New South Wales, 2139, Australia.

Elizabeth J Nightingale (EJ)

The University of Sydney, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Lidcombe, New South Wales, 2141, Australia.

Joshua Burns (J)

The University of Sydney, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Lidcombe, New South Wales, 2141, Australia.
Children's Hospital at Westmead, New South Wales, 2145, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH