Communication Technology Use by Caregivers of Adolescents With Mental Health Issues: Systematic Review.
IMBP
adolescent
caregiver
communication technology
mental health issues
parental skills
self-efficacy, knowledge
systematic review
Journal
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
ISSN: 2291-5222
Titre abrégé: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101624439
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 08 2020
19 08 2020
Historique:
received:
18
12
2018
accepted:
14
05
2020
revised:
11
12
2019
pubmed:
15
7
2020
medline:
18
3
2021
entrez:
15
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Caregivers of adolescents with mental health issues experience challenges that may result in the caregivers having a variety of unmet needs. There is a growing need to support these caregivers. Effective support to strengthen positive caregiving behavior in caregivers may address their challenges. Communication technologies offer novel opportunities to assist these caregivers and may contribute to strengthening caregiver behavior. However, little is known about the use of communication technologies among caregivers of adolescents with mental health issues. The study aimed to answer the question: "What is the best evidence available to strengthen positive behavior of caregivers of adolescents with mental health issues using communication technology." A systematic review of articles published between January 2007 and August 2018 was conducted. Searches included articles of multiple study designs from EBSCO Host and Scopus platforms with prespecified eligibility criteria. Methodological quality was evaluated using the applicable Critical Appraisal Skills Programme and Joanna Briggs Institute assessment tools. The search yielded 1746 articles. Altogether, 5 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review for data synthesis. Data analysis and synthesis identified three thematic conclusions reflecting the types of communication technologies used, caregivers as the target population, and strengthening of positive behavior through determinants of the Integrated Model of Behavior Prediction. The review reported the usefulness of communication technology by caregivers. Caregivers also demonstrated improvement in self-efficacy, knowledge, parent-child communication, and parental skills reflecting positive behavior. Although the use of communication technology is expanding as a supportive intervention to address caregivers' needs, the evidence for usefulness among caregivers of adolescents with mental health issues is still scarce. More research and information related to preferred methods of communication delivery among caregivers of adolescents is still needed.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Caregivers of adolescents with mental health issues experience challenges that may result in the caregivers having a variety of unmet needs. There is a growing need to support these caregivers. Effective support to strengthen positive caregiving behavior in caregivers may address their challenges. Communication technologies offer novel opportunities to assist these caregivers and may contribute to strengthening caregiver behavior. However, little is known about the use of communication technologies among caregivers of adolescents with mental health issues.
OBJECTIVE
The study aimed to answer the question: "What is the best evidence available to strengthen positive behavior of caregivers of adolescents with mental health issues using communication technology."
METHODS
A systematic review of articles published between January 2007 and August 2018 was conducted. Searches included articles of multiple study designs from EBSCO Host and Scopus platforms with prespecified eligibility criteria. Methodological quality was evaluated using the applicable Critical Appraisal Skills Programme and Joanna Briggs Institute assessment tools.
RESULTS
The search yielded 1746 articles. Altogether, 5 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review for data synthesis. Data analysis and synthesis identified three thematic conclusions reflecting the types of communication technologies used, caregivers as the target population, and strengthening of positive behavior through determinants of the Integrated Model of Behavior Prediction.
CONCLUSIONS
The review reported the usefulness of communication technology by caregivers. Caregivers also demonstrated improvement in self-efficacy, knowledge, parent-child communication, and parental skills reflecting positive behavior. Although the use of communication technology is expanding as a supportive intervention to address caregivers' needs, the evidence for usefulness among caregivers of adolescents with mental health issues is still scarce. More research and information related to preferred methods of communication delivery among caregivers of adolescents is still needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32663143
pii: v8i8e13179
doi: 10.2196/13179
pmc: PMC7468639
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e13179Informations de copyright
©Ronelle Jansen, Marianne Reid. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 19.08.2020.
Références
JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1052-60
pubmed: 24618967
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 22;15:33
pubmed: 25609559
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 28;19(7):e263
pubmed: 28754652
Health Commun. 2018 Jun;33(6):710-715
pubmed: 28402141
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2014;57(6-7):525-30
pubmed: 25105462
Asian J Psychiatr. 2016 Oct;23:71-77
pubmed: 27969083
J Adv Nurs. 2013 Jun;69(6):1428-37
pubmed: 22924808
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Oct;118:33-42
pubmed: 25089962
Lancet. 2018 Oct 27;392(10157):1553-1598
pubmed: 30314863
Health Commun. 2018 Sep;33(9):1078-1087
pubmed: 28622006
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Nov 16;17(1):265
pubmed: 29145806
J Adolesc Health. 2016 Jul;59(1):50-60
pubmed: 27235375
Am J Community Psychol. 2015 Jun;55(3-4):336-46
pubmed: 25623784
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 22;18(12):e333
pubmed: 28007689
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Aug 10;4(3):e97
pubmed: 27511612
J Health Commun. 2014;19(7):775-94
pubmed: 24559492
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Feb 14;15(2):
pubmed: 29443933
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jan 13;16(1):e9
pubmed: 24418967
J Paediatr Child Health. 2014 May;50(5):362-7
pubmed: 24612007
Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2014 Jul 10;5:127-42
pubmed: 25177156
J Pediatr Psychol. 2009 Jun;34(5):488-94
pubmed: 18845585
Gerontologist. 2016 Dec;56(6):1102-1113
pubmed: 26035875
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2014 Jan 1;2(1):455-481
pubmed: 25750795
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2016 Feb;61:253-260
pubmed: 27141147
Fam Syst Health. 2018 Jun;36(2):182-197
pubmed: 29902035
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2016 Oct;23(8):489-501
pubmed: 27500792
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Sep 20;2:57
pubmed: 27965873
J Glob Health. 2016 Jun;6(1):010401
pubmed: 26649177
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 03;18(3):e57
pubmed: 26940750
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2018 Feb;32(1):152-163
pubmed: 29413065
Public Health. 2017 Mar;144:125-133
pubmed: 28274374
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Sep-Oct;66:218-36
pubmed: 27372903
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jan 09;6(1):e7
pubmed: 29317380
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;4(6):486-500
pubmed: 28433615
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2017 Apr-Jun;4(2):136-139
pubmed: 28503646
BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 2;18(1):244
pubmed: 29499663
Prev Sci. 2019 Jan;20(1):56-67
pubmed: 29644545
J Fam Psychol. 2010 Oct;24(5):522-31
pubmed: 20954762
Comput Inform Nurs. 2015 Jan;33(1):10-20; quiz E1
pubmed: 25393833
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2017 Aug;26(4):395-402
pubmed: 26786507
J Fam Issues. 2016 Jun;37(9):1179-1202
pubmed: 27453615
J Ment Health. 2017 Apr;26(2):95-97
pubmed: 28355950
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 May;97:70-78
pubmed: 29242095
Mhealth. 2018 Apr 17;4:9
pubmed: 29780812
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Jan 21;2(1):e2
pubmed: 25098314
Pediatrics. 2014 May;133(5):884-97
pubmed: 24777220
Health Expect. 2015 Aug;18(4):452-74
pubmed: 23311692
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Jul 02;13:67
pubmed: 22748078
JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Aug 17;3(3):e38
pubmed: 27535468
Fam Soc. 2013;94(2):105-113
pubmed: 27293367
Health Expect. 2001 Sep;4(3):144-50
pubmed: 11493320
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Sep 29;13(3):e75
pubmed: 21960017
Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;206(4):268-74
pubmed: 25833867
Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1413916
pubmed: 29320947
J Pediatr Health Care. 2017 May - Jun;31(3):350-361
pubmed: 28012799
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017 Aug 1;11:45
pubmed: 28775764
Am Fam Physician. 2011 Jun 1;83(11):1309-17
pubmed: 21661713
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Apr 20;5(4):e47
pubmed: 28428165
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 26;20(4):e148
pubmed: 29699964
Front Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 21;8:178
pubmed: 28983262
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Jan 30;13:17
pubmed: 23363566
Cell. 2007 Apr 20;129(2):345-57
pubmed: 17448993
Lancet. 2016 Apr 16;387(10028):1672-85
pubmed: 26454360
JMIR Hum Factors. 2015 Jul 09;2(2):e12
pubmed: 27025279
Behav Ther. 2012 Jun;43(2):257-70
pubmed: 22440064
Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:483-505
pubmed: 25581147
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jun 18;6(6):e128
pubmed: 29914860
Early Child Res Q. 2015 4th Quarter;33:21-32
pubmed: 27773964
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 May 15;5(5):e66
pubmed: 28506955
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2017 Jun;20(2):185-200
pubmed: 27787701
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Apr;5(4):357-369
pubmed: 29580610
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2015 Feb;12(1):31-40
pubmed: 25588505
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Mar 6;3(2):e000543
pubmed: 29527356
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Mar 04;14(3):
pubmed: 28273862
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 05;20(1):e5
pubmed: 29305339
Asian J Psychiatr. 2011 Sep;4(3):165-71
pubmed: 23051112
Addict Behav. 2014 Apr;39(4):757-60
pubmed: 24447886
Gerontologist. 2015 Apr;55(2):309-19
pubmed: 26035608
Technol Disabil. 2018 Feb 5;29(1-2):1-14
pubmed: 29527109
Eur J Ageing. 2015;12(2):163-173
pubmed: 26346568
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Mar 25;16:80
pubmed: 27016185
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2014 Jun;11(3):168-76
pubmed: 24842341
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2017 Jan 01;14(Winter):1b
pubmed: 28566991
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2015 Apr;19(2):154-61
pubmed: 25667125
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2016 Jul-Aug;50(4):675-682
pubmed: 27680055