VBM sensitivity to localization and extent of mouse brain lesions: A simulation approach.
Atrophy simulation
Image preprocessing
Magnetic resonance imaging
Mouse brain
Voxel-based morphometry validation
Journal
Computer methods and programs in biomedicine
ISSN: 1872-7565
Titre abrégé: Comput Methods Programs Biomed
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8506513
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
07
01
2020
accepted:
24
06
2020
pubmed:
16
7
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
16
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) is a popular neuroimaging technique, used to detect and quantify morphological differences in brain tissues between groups. Widely used in human studies, VBM approaches have tremendous potential for neuroimaging studies in animal models. A significant challenge for applying VBM to small animal studies is the poor understanding of how the design of preprocessing pipelines impacts quantitative results. This is important because the large differences in size, resolution, and imaging parameters implies that human imaging preprocessing pipelines cannot be uncritically applied to small animal studies. In this work, we assessed and validated the performance of different VBM pipelines for the study of the mouse brain. We applied two pipelines -namely DARTEL VBM and Optimized VBM- by varying spatial normalization used during preprocessing. Using an automatic method, we simulated varying levels of volumetric gray matter (GM) loss and sizes of tissue atrophy on specific areas of the mouse brain. We evaluated the performance of each pipeline by comparing location and extent of the differences detected by them with the simulated ones. Finally, we applied both pipelines on magnetic resonance (MR) images of the brain derived from an experimental model of growth restriction on mice. Our results demonstrated that some subtle atrophies were detected by the Optimized workflow but not by the DARTEL VBM workflow. Detection of less subtle atrophies was similar for the two workflows, but DARTEL VBM performed better at estimating their size and anatomical location. Both VBM pipelines had difficulties at finding atrophies with a very small level of volumetric loss and, in general, they underestimated the magnitudes of difference between groups. These results also varied across brain regions, with better performance on brain cortex than other regions such as the cerebellum. The analysis and quantification of VBM pipelines on different areas of the mouse brain allows a better understanding of the advantages and limitations of their results. We performed a controlled and quantitative analysis of the method providing robust evidence to interpret changes in real contexts.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) is a popular neuroimaging technique, used to detect and quantify morphological differences in brain tissues between groups. Widely used in human studies, VBM approaches have tremendous potential for neuroimaging studies in animal models. A significant challenge for applying VBM to small animal studies is the poor understanding of how the design of preprocessing pipelines impacts quantitative results. This is important because the large differences in size, resolution, and imaging parameters implies that human imaging preprocessing pipelines cannot be uncritically applied to small animal studies. In this work, we assessed and validated the performance of different VBM pipelines for the study of the mouse brain.
METHODS
METHODS
We applied two pipelines -namely DARTEL VBM and Optimized VBM- by varying spatial normalization used during preprocessing. Using an automatic method, we simulated varying levels of volumetric gray matter (GM) loss and sizes of tissue atrophy on specific areas of the mouse brain. We evaluated the performance of each pipeline by comparing location and extent of the differences detected by them with the simulated ones. Finally, we applied both pipelines on magnetic resonance (MR) images of the brain derived from an experimental model of growth restriction on mice.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Our results demonstrated that some subtle atrophies were detected by the Optimized workflow but not by the DARTEL VBM workflow. Detection of less subtle atrophies was similar for the two workflows, but DARTEL VBM performed better at estimating their size and anatomical location. Both VBM pipelines had difficulties at finding atrophies with a very small level of volumetric loss and, in general, they underestimated the magnitudes of difference between groups. These results also varied across brain regions, with better performance on brain cortex than other regions such as the cerebellum.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The analysis and quantification of VBM pipelines on different areas of the mouse brain allows a better understanding of the advantages and limitations of their results. We performed a controlled and quantitative analysis of the method providing robust evidence to interpret changes in real contexts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32668384
pii: S0169-2607(20)31469-3
doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105636
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
105636Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest in this work.