Non-elective paraesophageal hernia repair: surgical approaches and short-term outcomes.
Emergent
Laparoscopic
NSQIP
Non-elective
Paraesophageal hernia
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2021
07 2021
Historique:
received:
05
05
2020
accepted:
01
07
2020
pubmed:
17
7
2020
medline:
30
9
2021
entrez:
17
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The majority of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repairs are performed electively. We aimed to investigate the frequency of non-elective laparoscopic (MIS) PEH repair and compare 30-day outcomes to elective MIS repairs and non-elective open repairs. We hypothesized that an increasing percentage of non-elective PEH repairs would be performed laparoscopically and that this population would have improved outcomes compared to non-elective open PEH counterparts. The 2011-2016 NSQIP PUFs were used to identify patients who underwent PEH repair. Case status was classified as open vs. MIS and elective versus non-elective. Preoperative patient characteristics, operative details, discharge destination, and 30-day postoperative complication rates were compared. Logistic regression was used to examine the impact of case status on 30-day mortality. We identified 20,010 patients who underwent PEH. There were an increasing number of MIS PEH repairs in NSQIP between 2011 and 2016. Non-elective repairs were performed in 2,173 patients and 73.4% of these were completed laparoscopically. Elective MIS patients were younger, had a higher BMI, and were more likely to be functionally independent (p < 0.01) than their non-elective counterparts. Non-elective MIS patients had a higher wound class and ASA class compared to their elective counterparts. Compared to elective MIS cases, non-elective MIS PEH repair was associated with increased odds of mortality, even after controlling for patient characteristics (OR = 1.76, p = 0.02). There was no statistically significant difference in mortality for non-elective MIS vs. non-elective open PEH repair. There is an increase in non-elective PEH repairs recorded in NSQIP over time studied. The population undergoing non-elective MIS PEH repairs is different from their elective MIS counterparts and experience a higher postoperative mortality rate. While the observed increased utilization of MIS techniques in non-elective PEH repairs likely provides benefits for the patient, there remain differences in outcomes for these patients compared to elective PEH repairs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The majority of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repairs are performed electively. We aimed to investigate the frequency of non-elective laparoscopic (MIS) PEH repair and compare 30-day outcomes to elective MIS repairs and non-elective open repairs. We hypothesized that an increasing percentage of non-elective PEH repairs would be performed laparoscopically and that this population would have improved outcomes compared to non-elective open PEH counterparts.
METHODS
The 2011-2016 NSQIP PUFs were used to identify patients who underwent PEH repair. Case status was classified as open vs. MIS and elective versus non-elective. Preoperative patient characteristics, operative details, discharge destination, and 30-day postoperative complication rates were compared. Logistic regression was used to examine the impact of case status on 30-day mortality.
RESULTS
We identified 20,010 patients who underwent PEH. There were an increasing number of MIS PEH repairs in NSQIP between 2011 and 2016. Non-elective repairs were performed in 2,173 patients and 73.4% of these were completed laparoscopically. Elective MIS patients were younger, had a higher BMI, and were more likely to be functionally independent (p < 0.01) than their non-elective counterparts. Non-elective MIS patients had a higher wound class and ASA class compared to their elective counterparts. Compared to elective MIS cases, non-elective MIS PEH repair was associated with increased odds of mortality, even after controlling for patient characteristics (OR = 1.76, p = 0.02). There was no statistically significant difference in mortality for non-elective MIS vs. non-elective open PEH repair. There is an increase in non-elective PEH repairs recorded in NSQIP over time studied.
CONCLUSIONS
The population undergoing non-elective MIS PEH repairs is different from their elective MIS counterparts and experience a higher postoperative mortality rate. While the observed increased utilization of MIS techniques in non-elective PEH repairs likely provides benefits for the patient, there remain differences in outcomes for these patients compared to elective PEH repairs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32671522
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07782-3
pii: 10.1007/s00464-020-07782-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3405-3411Références
Mungo B, Molena D, Stem M, Feinberg RL, Lidor AO (2014) Thirty-day outcomes of paraesophageal hernia repair using the NSQIP database: should laparoscopy be the standard of care? J Am Coll Surg 219:229–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAMCOLLSURG.2014.02.030
doi: 10.1016/J.JAMCOLLSURG.2014.02.030
pubmed: 24891211
Quinn MA, Geraghty AJ, Robertson AGN, Paterson-Brown S, Lamb PJ, Group the EO-GS (2019) Long-term outcomes following surgical repair of giant paraoesophageal hiatus hernia. Surg Endosc 33:1846–1853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6463-y
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6463-y
pubmed: 30406385
Teague WJ, Ackroyd R, Watson DI, Devitt PG (2000) Changing patterns in the management of gastric volvulus over 14 years. Br J Surg 87:358–361. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01385.x
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01385.x
pubmed: 10718808
Malangoni MA, Biester TW, Jones AT, Klingensmith ME, Lewis FR (2013) Operative experience of surgery residents: trends and challenges. J Surg Educ 70:783–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSURG.2013.09.015
doi: 10.1016/J.JSURG.2013.09.015
pubmed: 24209656
Dominguez EP, Barrat C, Shaffer L, Gruner R, Whisler D, Taylor P (2013) Minimally invasive surgery adoption into an established surgical practice: impact of a fellowship-trained colleague. Surg Endosc 27:1267–1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2594-8
doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2594-8
pubmed: 23232996
Park A, Kavic SM, Lee TH, Heniford BT (2007) Minimally invasive surgery: the evolution of fellowship. Surgery 142:505–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SURG.2007.07.009
doi: 10.1016/J.SURG.2007.07.009
pubmed: 17950342
Ross SW, Oommen B, Kim M, Walters AL, Green JM, Heniford BT, Augenstein VA (2014) A little slower, but just as good: postgraduate year resident versus attending outcomes in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 28:3092–3100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3586-7
doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3586-7
pubmed: 24902819
Ross SW, Oommen B, Huntington C, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Kercher KW, Augenstein VA, Heniford BT (2015) National outcomes for open ventral hernia repair techniques in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Am Surg 81:778–785
doi: 10.1177/000313481508100815
Ross SW, Oommen B, Wormer BA, Walters AL, Matthews BD, Heniford BT, Augenstein VA (2015) National outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy: operative complications and risk factors for adverse events. Surg Endosc 29:3097–3105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-4054-0
doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4054-0
pubmed: 25588362
Ross SW, Seshadri R, Walters AL, Augenstein VA, Heniford BT, Iannitti DA, Martinie JB, Vrochides D, Swan RZ (2016) Mortality in hepatectomy: model for end-stage liver disease as a predictor of death using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Surgery 159:777–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.08.021
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.08.021
pubmed: 26474653
American College of Surgeons (2016) ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP). https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/acs-nsqip . Accessed 28 Apr 2020
Neuwirth MG, Bartlett EK, Newton AD, Fraker DL, Kelz RR, Roses RE, Karakousis GC (2016) Morbidity and mortality after total splenectomy for lymphoid neoplasms. J Surg Res 205:155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.031
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.031
pubmed: 27621013
Schieman C, Grondin SC (2009) Paraesophageal hernia: clinical presentation, evaluation, and management controversies. Thorac Surg Clin 19:473–484
doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2009.08.006
Richards MK, McAteer JP, Drake FT, Goldin AB, Khandelwal S, Gow KW (2015) A national review of the frequency of minimally invasive surgery among general surgery residents: assessment of ACGME case logs during 2 decades of general surgery resident training. JAMA Surg 150:169–172. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1791
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1791
pubmed: 25548997
Dallemagne B, Kohnen L, Perretta S, Weerts J, Markiewicz S, Jehaes C (2011) Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia: long-term follow-up reveals good clinical outcome despite high radiological recurrence rate. Ann Surg 253:291–296. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ff44c0
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ff44c0
pubmed: 21217518
Okrainec A, Ferri LE, Feldman LS, Fried GM (2011) Defining the learning curve in laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a CUSUM analysis. Surg Endosc 25:1083–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1321-6
doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1321-6
pubmed: 20835725
Udyavar R, Cornwell EE, Havens JM, Hashmi ZG, Scott JW, Sturgeon D, Uribe-Leitz T, Lipsitz SR, Salim A, Haider AH (2018) Surgeon-driven variability in emergency general surgery outcomes: does it matter who is on call? Surgery 164:1109–1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.07.008
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.07.008
pubmed: 30174142
Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Bisgaard T (2013) Outcomes after emergency versus elective ventral hernia repair: a prospective nationwide study. World J Surg 37:2273–2279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2123-5
doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2123-5
pubmed: 23756775
Askari A, Malietzis G, Nachiappan S, Antoniou A, Jenkins J, Kennedy R, Faiz O (2015) Defining characteristics of patients with colorectal cancer requiring emergency surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 30:1329–1336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2313-8
doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2313-8
pubmed: 26169634