Patients presenting for hospital-based screening for the coronavirus disease 2019: Risk of disease, and healthcare access preferences.
Ambulatory Care Facilities
/ statistics & numerical data
Australia
COVID-19
Coronavirus Infections
/ diagnosis
Cross-Sectional Studies
Emergency Service, Hospital
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
Health Services Accessibility
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Incidence
Male
Mass Screening
/ organization & administration
Pandemics
/ prevention & control
Patient Preference
Pneumonia, Viral
/ diagnosis
Public Health
Risk Assessment
Tertiary Care Centers
coronavirus disease 2019
epidemic
outbreak
pandemic
severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Journal
Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA
ISSN: 1742-6723
Titre abrégé: Emerg Med Australas
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101199824
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
received:
03
05
2020
revised:
08
06
2020
accepted:
09
06
2020
pubmed:
17
7
2020
medline:
8
10
2020
entrez:
17
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Early during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Australian EDs experienced an unprecedented surge in patients seeking screening. Understanding what proportion of these patients require testing and who can be safely screened in community-based models of care is critical for workforce and infrastructure planning across the healthcare system, as well as public messaging campaigns. In this cross-sectional survey, we screened patients presenting to a COVID-19 screening clinic in a tertiary ED. We assessed the proportion of patients who met testing criteria; self-reported symptom severity; reasons why they came to the ED for screening and views on community-based care. We include findings from 1846 patients. Most patients (55.3%) did not meet contemporaneous criteria for testing and most (57.6%) had mild or no (13.4%) symptoms. The main reason for coming to the ED was being referred by a telephone health service (31.3%) and 136 (7.4%) said they tried to contact their general practitioner but could not get an appointment. Only 47 (2.6%) said they thought the disease was too specialised for their general practitioner to manage. While capacity building in acute care facilities is an important part of pandemic planning, it is also important that patients not needing hospital level of care can be assessed and treated elsewhere. We have identified a significant proportion of people at this early stage in the pandemic who have sought healthcare at hospital but who might have been assisted in the community had services been available and public health messaging structured to guide them there.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32671974
doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13589
pmc: PMC7405479
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
809-813Subventions
Organisme : National Health and Medical Research Council
ID : GN1136222
Pays : International
Organisme : Open Philanthropies
Pays : International
Organisme : Victorian Operating Fund
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
© 2020 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine.
Références
JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239-1242
pubmed: 32091533
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708-1720
pubmed: 32109013
Med J Aust. 2020 Jun;212(10):447-450.e1
pubmed: 32415678