Association of BRAF V600E/K Mutation Status and Prior BRAF/MEK Inhibition With Pembrolizumab Outcomes in Advanced Melanoma: Pooled Analysis of 3 Clinical Trials.
Aged
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ therapeutic use
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Male
Melanoma
/ drug therapy
Middle Aged
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Mutation
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
Journal
JAMA oncology
ISSN: 2374-2445
Titre abrégé: JAMA Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101652861
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 08 2020
01 08 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
17
7
2020
medline:
30
1
2021
entrez:
17
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The optimal sequencing of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy for BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma is not well established. To assess the association of BRAF wild-type (WT) or BRAF V600E/K-mutant status and BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) with or without MEK inhibitor (MEKi) therapy with response to pembrolizumab. This study is a post hoc subgroup analysis of pooled data from 3 multinational, multisite studies: KEYNOTE-001 (data cutoff September 1, 2017), KEYNOTE-002 (data cutoff May 30, 2018), and KEYNOTE-006 (data cutoff December 4, 2017). Patients included in this analysis were adults with advanced melanoma and known BRAF V600E/K tumor status who had received pembrolizumab. Patients received pembrolizumab in dosages of 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks. End points were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, and overall survival (OS). Objective response rates, 4-year PFS, and OS rates were compared in the following patient subgroups: BRAF WT vs BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma and BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma with vs without previous treatment with BRAFi with or without MEKi therapy. The overall study population (N = 1558) included 944 men (60.6%) and 614 women (39.4%). The mean (SD) age was 60.0 years (14.0). The ORR was 38.3% (596/1558), 4-year PFS rate was 22.0%, and 4-year OS rate was 36.9%. For patients with BRAF WT (n = 1124) and BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma (n = 434), ORR was 39.8% (n = 447) and 34.3% (n = 149), 4-year PFS rate was 22.9% and 19.8%, and 4-year OS rate was 37.5% and 35.1%, respectively. Patients with BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma who had (n = 271) vs had not (n = 163) previously received BRAFi with or without MEKi therapy had baseline characteristics with worse prognosis; ORR was 28.4% (n = 77) and 44.2% (n = 72), 4-year PFS rate was 15.2% and 27.8%, and 4-year OS rate was 26.9% and 49.3%, respectively. Results of this subgroup analysis support the use of pembrolizumab for treatment of advanced melanoma regardless of BRAF V600E/K mutation status or receipt of prior BRAFi with or without MEKi therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32672795
pii: 2768018
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.2288
pmc: PMC7366279
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
pembrolizumab
DPT0O3T46P
BRAF protein, human
EC 2.7.11.1
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
EC 2.7.11.1
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases
EC 2.7.12.2
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase I
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1256-1264Références
Nat Med. 2019 Jun;25(6):941-946
pubmed: 31171878
Oncoimmunology. 2017 Jan 19;6(3):e1283462
pubmed: 28405510
J Transl Med. 2012 May 28;10:107
pubmed: 22640478
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec;34(34):4102-4109
pubmed: 27863197
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):908-18
pubmed: 26115796
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Jul;1(4):433-40
pubmed: 26181250
JAMA. 2016 Apr 19;315(15):1600-9
pubmed: 27092830
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;86:37-45
pubmed: 28961465
Lancet Oncol. 2018 May;19(5):672-681
pubmed: 29602646
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jul 11;369(2):134-44
pubmed: 23724846
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2016 Jan;8(1):48-56
pubmed: 26753005
J Immunother. 2017 Jan;40(1):31-35
pubmed: 27846054
Lancet. 2017 Oct 21;390(10105):1853-1862
pubmed: 28822576
J Transl Med. 2012 Jul 09;10:85
pubmed: 22554099
Lancet. 2014 Sep 20;384(9948):1109-17
pubmed: 25034862
Cancer Res. 2003 Feb 15;63(4):756-9
pubmed: 12591721
Cell. 2016 Mar 24;165(1):35-44
pubmed: 26997480
Nature. 2002 Jun 27;417(6892):949-54
pubmed: 12068308
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr 1;29(10):1239-46
pubmed: 21343559
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Dec;17(12):1743-1754
pubmed: 27864013
Cell. 2015 Sep 10;162(6):1271-85
pubmed: 26359985
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;36(7):667-673
pubmed: 28991513
Cancer. 2014 Jun 1;120(11):1695-701
pubmed: 24577748
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2521-32
pubmed: 25891173
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 1;23(17):4992-5002
pubmed: 28864727
Mod Pathol. 2015 Dec;28(12):1535-44
pubmed: 26403784
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 20;27(36):6199-206
pubmed: 19917835