Effectiveness of Stroke Early Supported Discharge: Analysis From a National Stroke Registry.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Clinical Decision-Making
Decision Support Techniques
Disability Evaluation
England
Female
Functional Status
Humans
Length of Stay
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Discharge
Patient Outcome Assessment
Predictive Value of Tests
Program Evaluation
Registries
Stroke
/ diagnosis
Stroke Rehabilitation
Time Factors
England
consensus
hospitals
registries
survivors
Journal
Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes
ISSN: 1941-7705
Titre abrégé: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101489148
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
18
7
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
18
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Implementation of stroke early supported discharge (ESD) services has been recommended in many countries' clinical guidelines, based on clinical trial evidence. This is the first observational study to investigate the effectiveness of ESD service models operating in real-world conditions, at scale. Using historical prospective data from the United Kingdom Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (January 1, 2016-December 31, 2016), measures of ESD effectiveness were "days to ESD" (number of days from hospital discharge to first ESD contact; n=6222), "rehabilitation intensity" (total number of treatment days/total days with ESD; n=5891), and stroke survivor outcome (modified Rankin scale at ESD discharge; n=6222). ESD service models (derived from Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme postacute organizational audit data) were categorized with a 17-item score, reflecting adoption of ESD consensus core components (evidence-based criteria). Multilevel modeling analysis was undertaken as patients were clustered within ESD teams across the Midlands, East, and North of England (n=31). A variety of ESD service models had been adopted, as reflected by variability in the ESD consensus score. Controlling for patient characteristics and Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme hospital score, a 1-unit increase in ESD consensus score was significantly associated with a more responsive ESD service (reduced odds of patient being seen after ≥1 day of 29% [95% CI, 1%-49%] and increased treatment intensity by 2% [95% CI, 0.3%-4%]). There was no association with stroke survivor outcome measured by the modified Rankin Scale. This study has shown that adopting defined core components of ESD is associated with providing a more responsive and intensive ESD service. This shows that adherence to evidence-based criteria is likely to result in a more effective ESD service as defined by process measures. Registration: URL: http://www.isrctn.com/; Unique identifier: ISRCTN15568163.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Implementation of stroke early supported discharge (ESD) services has been recommended in many countries' clinical guidelines, based on clinical trial evidence. This is the first observational study to investigate the effectiveness of ESD service models operating in real-world conditions, at scale.
METHODS AND RESULTS
Using historical prospective data from the United Kingdom Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (January 1, 2016-December 31, 2016), measures of ESD effectiveness were "days to ESD" (number of days from hospital discharge to first ESD contact; n=6222), "rehabilitation intensity" (total number of treatment days/total days with ESD; n=5891), and stroke survivor outcome (modified Rankin scale at ESD discharge; n=6222). ESD service models (derived from Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme postacute organizational audit data) were categorized with a 17-item score, reflecting adoption of ESD consensus core components (evidence-based criteria). Multilevel modeling analysis was undertaken as patients were clustered within ESD teams across the Midlands, East, and North of England (n=31). A variety of ESD service models had been adopted, as reflected by variability in the ESD consensus score. Controlling for patient characteristics and Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme hospital score, a 1-unit increase in ESD consensus score was significantly associated with a more responsive ESD service (reduced odds of patient being seen after ≥1 day of 29% [95% CI, 1%-49%] and increased treatment intensity by 2% [95% CI, 0.3%-4%]). There was no association with stroke survivor outcome measured by the modified Rankin Scale.
CONCLUSIONS
This study has shown that adopting defined core components of ESD is associated with providing a more responsive and intensive ESD service. This shows that adherence to evidence-based criteria is likely to result in a more effective ESD service as defined by process measures. Registration: URL: http://www.isrctn.com/; Unique identifier: ISRCTN15568163.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32674640
doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006395
pmc: PMC7439934
doi:
Banques de données
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN15568163']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e006395Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 16/01/17
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
BMJ. 2014 Aug 05;349:g4757
pubmed: 25098169
J Neurol Sci. 2016 Apr 15;363:16-20
pubmed: 27000213
Stroke. 2015 Apr;46(4):1065-70
pubmed: 25677597
J Neurol Sci. 2019 Feb 15;397:63-74
pubmed: 30594105
Stroke. 2019 Jul;50(7):e187-e210
pubmed: 31104615
Int J Stroke. 2016 Jun;11(4):459-84
pubmed: 27079654
Clin Rehabil. 2013 Aug;27(8):750-7
pubmed: 23455948
Clin Rehabil. 2016 Mar;30(3):268-76
pubmed: 25828093
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 13;7:CD000443
pubmed: 28703869
Clin Rehabil. 2014 Apr;28(4):370-7
pubmed: 24006226
Clin Rehabil. 2012 Sep;26(9):771-86
pubmed: 22257504
Clin Rehabil. 2018 Aug;32(8):997-1006
pubmed: 29932011
Clin Rehabil. 2014 Dec;28(12):1237-47
pubmed: 25389172
Stroke. 2011 May;42(5):1392-7
pubmed: 21441151
Lancet. 2011 May 14;377(9778):1693-702
pubmed: 21571152
Implement Sci. 2019 Jun 13;14(1):61
pubmed: 31196123
Health Soc Care Community. 2009 Feb;17(1):45-53
pubmed: 18564193
J Interprof Care. 2015;29(4):331-9
pubmed: 25158116
Int J Stroke. 2016 Jan;11(1):28-40
pubmed: 26763018