Multimodal validation of focal enhancement in intracranial aneurysms as a surrogate marker for aneurysm instability.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aneurysm, Ruptured
/ diagnostic imaging
Angiography, Digital Subtraction
Biomarkers
/ blood
Contrast Media
Female
Hemodynamics
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
/ methods
Inflammation
/ diagnostic imaging
Intracranial Aneurysm
/ diagnostic imaging
Iopamidol
/ analogs & derivatives
Magnetic Resonance Angiography
/ methods
Male
Middle Aged
Risk Factors
Hemodynamics
Histology
Intracranial aneurysm
Magnetic resonance imaging
Morphology
Subarachnoid hemorrhage
Journal
Neuroradiology
ISSN: 1432-1920
Titre abrégé: Neuroradiology
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 1302751
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
01
05
2020
accepted:
13
07
2020
pubmed:
19
7
2020
medline:
7
7
2021
entrez:
19
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Circumferential enhancement on MR vessel wall imaging has been proposed as a biomarker of a higher risk of rupture in intracranial aneurysms. Focal enhancement is frequently encountered in unruptured aneurysms, but its implication for risk stratification and patient management remains unclear. This study investigates the association of focal wall enhancement with hemodynamic and morphological risk factors and histologic markers of wall inflammation and degeneration. Patients with an unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysm who underwent 3D rotational angiography and 3T MR vessel wall imaging showing focal wall enhancement were included. Hemodynamic parameters were calculated based on flow simulations and compared between enhanced regions and the entire aneurysm surface. Morphological parameters were semiautomatically extracted and quantitatively associated with wall enhancement. Histological analysis included detection of vasa vasorum, CD34, and myeloperoxidase staining in a subset of patients. Twenty-two aneurysms were analyzed. Enhanced regions were significantly associated with lower AWSS, lower maxOSI, and increased LSA. In multivariate analysis, higher ellipticity index was an independent predictor of wall enhancement. Histologic signs of inflammation and degeneration and higher PHASES score were significantly associated with focal enhancement. Focal wall enhancement is colocalized with hemodynamic factors that have been related to a higher rupture risk. It is correlated with morphological factors linked to rupture risk, higher PHASES score, and histologic markers of wall destabilization. The results support the hypothesis that focal enhancement could serve as a surrogate marker for aneurysm instability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32681192
doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02498-6
pii: 10.1007/s00234-020-02498-6
pmc: PMC7666674
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Contrast Media
0
iomeprol
17E17JBP8L
Iopamidol
JR13W81H44
Types de publication
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1627-1635Subventions
Organisme : Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
ID : 13GW0095A
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : SA 3461/2-1, BE 6230/2-1
Organisme : European Regional Development Fund
ID : ZS/2016/04/78123
Références
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Nov;39(11):2082-2087
pubmed: 30262645
Stroke. 2004 Oct;35(10):2287-93
pubmed: 15322297
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Jul 1;47(1):E5
pubmed: 31261128
Interv Neuroradiol. 2019 Jun;25(3):310-314
pubmed: 30764685
Lancet Neurol. 2009 Jul;8(7):635-42
pubmed: 19501022
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Mar;40(3):510-516
pubmed: 30733253
Neurosurgery. 2013 Mar;72(3):492-6; discussion 496
pubmed: 23151622
Neuroradiology. 2016 Oct;58(10):979-985
pubmed: 27438805
Radiology. 2018 Oct;289(1):181-187
pubmed: 29969070
Neurosurgery. 2008 Aug;63(2):185-96; discussion 196-7
pubmed: 18797347
J Neurosurg. 2020 Jan 10;:1-11
pubmed: 31923894
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2006;9(Pt 2):726-33
pubmed: 17354837
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 Nov;13(11):1781-1793
pubmed: 30159832
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Jul;35(7):1254-62
pubmed: 23598838
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Mar;10(3):290-296
pubmed: 28465404
Stroke. 2011 Jan;42(1):144-52
pubmed: 21106956
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Jul 1;47(1):E18
pubmed: 31261122
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;34(2):121-9
pubmed: 22965244
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 Jan;13(1):83-93
pubmed: 28733907
Nat Rev Neurol. 2016 Dec;12(12):699-713
pubmed: 27808265
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Dec;40(12):2102-2110
pubmed: 31780462
Neurosurgery. 2019 Jun 1;84(6):E385-E391
pubmed: 30011026
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Jan;8(1):104-10
pubmed: 25488922
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Sep;39(9):1617-1621
pubmed: 30026386
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Jul 1;47(1):E19
pubmed: 31261123
Lancet. 2003 Jul 12;362(9378):103-10
pubmed: 12867109
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Jul;40(7):1106-1111
pubmed: 31147351
World Neurosurg. 2015 Jan;83(1):80-6
pubmed: 23403347
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Jun;10(6):566-570
pubmed: 28918385
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Oct;39(10):1860-1866
pubmed: 30166431
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Aug;8(8):808-12
pubmed: 26253110
Br J Radiol. 2019 Apr;92(1096):20180950
pubmed: 30653339
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Jun;39(6):1065-1067
pubmed: 29599170
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Jan;32(1):145-51
pubmed: 21127144
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Nov;38(11):2105-2110
pubmed: 28912279
J Biomech Eng. 2014 Apr;136(4):
pubmed: 24292415
Neuroradiology. 2019 Mar;61(3):275-284
pubmed: 30456458
J Neurosurg. 2019 Mar 15;:1-7
pubmed: 30875692
Diagn Mol Pathol. 2013 Sep;22(3):127-37
pubmed: 23846438
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 06;10(7):e0132494
pubmed: 26147995
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;127:e578-e584
pubmed: 30928597
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2018 Dec;9(4):565-581
pubmed: 30191538
World Neurosurg. 2020 May;137:e138-e143
pubmed: 32004740
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Feb;11(2):153-158
pubmed: 30341160
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Feb;39(2):337-343
pubmed: 29269407