Thigh-Muscle and Patient-Reported Function Early After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical Cutoffs Unique to Graft Type and Age.
Adolescent
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
/ surgery
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
/ rehabilitation
Cross-Sectional Studies
Exercise Therapy
Female
Hamstring Muscles
/ physiopathology
Humans
Knee Joint
/ physiology
Male
Muscle Strength
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Quadriceps Muscle
/ physiopathology
Recovery of Function
Thigh
Treatment Outcome
IKDC
hamstrings strength
patient-reported outcomes
quadriceps strength
Journal
Journal of athletic training
ISSN: 1938-162X
Titre abrégé: J Athl Train
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9301647
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2020
01 Aug 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
21
7
2020
medline:
20
1
2021
entrez:
21
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patient-reported function is an important outcome in anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation. Identifying which metrics of thigh-muscle function are indicators of normal patient-reported function can help guide treatment. To identify which metrics of thigh-muscle function discriminate between patients who meet and patients who fail to meet age- and sex-matched normative values for patient-reported knee function in the first 9 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and establish cutoffs for these metrics by covariate subgroups. Cross-sectional retrospective study. Laboratory. A total of 256 patients (129 females, 128 males; age = 17.1 ± 3.0 years, height = 1.7 ± 0.1 m, mass = 74.1 ± 17.9 kg, months since surgery = 6.4 ± 1.4), 3 to 9 months after primary unilateral ACLR. We stratified the sample into dichotomous groups by the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (IKDCMET, IKDCNOT MET) using sex- and age-matched normative values. We measured quadriceps and hamstrings isokinetic (60°/s) torque and power bilaterally. Normalized quadriceps and hamstrings peak torque (Nm/kg) and power (W/kg), limb symmetry indices (LSI, %), and hamstrings : quadriceps ratios were calculated. Logistic regression indicated which of these metrics could predict IKDC classification while controlling for age, graft type, and sex. Receiver operating characteristic curves established cutoffs for explanatory variables for both total cohort and covariate subgroups. Odds ratios (OR) determined the utility of each cutoff to discriminate IKDC status. Quadriceps torque LSI (≥69.4%, OR = 3.6), hamstrings torque (≥1.11 Nm/kg, OR = 2.1), and quadriceps power LSI (≥71.4%, OR = 2.0) discriminated between IKDC classification in the total cohort. Quadriceps torque LSI discriminated between IKDC classification in the patellar-tendon graft (≥61.6%, OR = 5.3), hamstrings-tendon graft (≥71.8%, OR = 10.5), and age <18 years (≥74.3%, OR = 5.2) subgroups. Hamstrings torque discriminated between IKDC classifications in the age <18 years (≥1.10 Nm/kg, OR = 2.6) subgroup. Quadriceps torque LSI, hamstrings torque, and quadriceps power LSI were the most useful metrics for predicting normal patient-reported knee function early after ACLR. Further, cutoff values that best predicted normal patient-reported function differed by graft type and age.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32688373
pii: 440722
doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-370-19
pmc: PMC7462175
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
826-833Informations de copyright
© by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):782-3
pubmed: 22375968
Phys Ther Sport. 2019 Jul;38:36-43
pubmed: 31042614
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Jan;34(1):128-35
pubmed: 16219941
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):97-105
pubmed: 27590173
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Oct;40(10):2348-56
pubmed: 22926749
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Apr;43(4):848-56
pubmed: 25583757
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):2242-9
pubmed: 26183172
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Aug;50(15):946-51
pubmed: 27215935
J Sport Rehabil. 2018 Jun 25;:1-9
pubmed: 28714825
J Sport Rehabil. 2018 May 1;27(3):201-212
pubmed: 28290752
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Dec;26(12):3636-3644
pubmed: 29574548
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Mar;49(5):335-42
pubmed: 23881894
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Sep;42(9):750-9
pubmed: 22813542
Am J Sports Med. 2011 May;39(5):933-9
pubmed: 21068443
Arthroscopy. 2011 Dec;27(12):1697-705
pubmed: 22137326
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Mar;27(3):921-930
pubmed: 30327821
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 08;11(1):e0146234
pubmed: 26745808
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Mar;40(3):595-605
pubmed: 22184280
Cancer. 1950 Jan;3(1):32-5
pubmed: 15405679
J Sport Rehabil. 2015 Feb;24(1):36-46
pubmed: 25203517
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Sep;53(18):1154-1161
pubmed: 30712009
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Feb;17(2):162-9
pubmed: 18982311
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1993;67(6):499-506
pubmed: 8149928
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 May;29(5):716-724
pubmed: 30672626
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(4):857-862
pubmed: 30753794
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):578-583
pubmed: 30649903
J Athl Train. 2018 Oct;53(10):965-975
pubmed: 30288991
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Sep;48(9):1671-7
pubmed: 27054675
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):527-534
pubmed: 27864185
Muscle Nerve. 2018 Jan 18;:
pubmed: 29346717
N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 23;363(26):2477-81
pubmed: 21142528